Fiat Completes Acquisition of Chrysler, Marchionne Open to Other Partners

TTAC Staff
by TTAC Staff

Fiat announced that it has completed the acquisition of all remaining shares in Chrysler Group that it did not own. The United Auto Workers’ retiree healthcare trust, known as a voluntary employee beneficiary association or VEBA, received $3.65 billion in cash for its 41.46% stake in the Auburn Hills based automaker, $1.9 billion of which came from Chrysler and $1.75 billion from Fiat. The total deal is worth $4.35 billion, with Chrysler committed to pay the trust the remaining $700 million in four annual equal payments, the first of which was made when the deal was consummated.

The closing of the deal took place after a year and a half of negotiations, lawsuits and the threat of an initial public offering of Chrysler stock, but Sergio Marchionne has finally realized his ambition to combine Fiat and Chrysler. That gives Fiat access to Chrysler’s profits, needed to shore up the Italian automaker which is overexposed to the weak European market. Fiat projects spending as much as 9 billion euros ($12 billion) on investments in its Italian factories revamping its aging product lineup.

Fiat chairman John Elkann told reporters at the Detroit auto show last week that Marchionne, 61, will remain CEO through at least 2016 to manage what will now be the world’s 7th largest car company. The two companies sold about 4.4 million vehicles combined last year.

Fiat’s board of directors will meet at the end of January work out the details of the merger, including how the joint corporation will be organized, where the headquarters will be, and on which stock exchange the company will list its main stock listing, Elkann said. He also said that the merged company’s name will include both Fiat and Chrysler. At the Detroit show last week Marchionne said that the U.S. has a “large claim” as the location of the future headquarters, and that he prefers the New York Stock Exchange as the primary listing for the group. Marchionne also said that once the merger is complete, he would be open to additional partnerships with other automakers, such as PSA Peugeot Citroen and Suzuki though there is less urgency now that the merged company has “the credentials to be at the table” with top global automakers.

TTAC Staff
TTAC Staff

More by TTAC Staff

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 24 comments
  • 95_SC 95_SC on Jan 22, 2014

    So Fiat purchased Chrysler using a bunch of Chrysler's money. Sort of like the ultimate cash on the hood incentive I guess.

    • Lorenzo Lorenzo on Jan 22, 2014

      That's pretty much how takeovers work on Wall Street. The buyer borrows money to buy a target, and the target has to pay it off. Lots of well-run companies that kept low debt loads were laid low by their buyers' debt, but their former owners walked away with a bundle.

  • Sitting@home Sitting@home on Jan 22, 2014

    "The United Auto Workers’ retiree healthcare trust, known as a voluntary employee beneficiary association or VEBA, received $3.65 billion in cash for its 41.46% stake in the Auburn Hills" I thought the whole reorganization thing was set up so that the UAW had an ownership incentive to improve the performance of the company. With a big pile of cash now sitting in the bank and no foot on the controls of the company, I expect another UAW executive golf retreat and unrealistic demands for wage and benefit increases to be coming soon.

    • Pch101 Pch101 on Jan 22, 2014

      The VEBA was a creditor in the bankruptcy. There wasn't enough money to pay the VEBA for its claims against the old Chrysler. As a compromise, the VEBA took shares in the new Chrysler. Those shares could have turned out to be worthless if the turnaround effort failed. As it stands, the VEBA is not coming out of this whole. The VEBA took a haircut.

  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Thankfully I don't have to deal with GDI issues in my Frontier. These cleaners should do well for me if I win.
  • Theflyersfan Serious answer time...Honda used to stand for excellence in auto engineering. Their first main claim to fame was the CVCC (we don't need a catalytic converter!) engine and it sent from there. Their suspensions, their VTEC engines, slick manual transmissions, even a stowing minivan seat, all theirs. But I think they've been coasting a bit lately. Yes, the Civic Type-R has a powerful small engine, but the Honda of old would have found a way to get more revs out of it and make it feel like an i-VTEC engine of old instead of any old turbo engine that can be found in a multitude of performance small cars. Their 1.5L turbo-4...well...have they ever figured out the oil dilution problems? Very un-Honda-like. Paint issues that still linger. Cheaper feeling interior trim. All things that fly in the face of what Honda once was. The only thing that they seem to have kept have been the sales staff that treat you with utter contempt for daring to walk into their inner sanctum and wanting a deal on something that isn't a bare-bones CR-V. So Honda, beat the rest of your Japanese and Korean rivals, and plug-in hybridize everything. If you want a relatively (in an engineering way) easy way to get ahead of the curve, raise the CAFE score, and have a major point to advertise, and be able to sell to those who can't plug in easily, sell them on something that will get, for example, 35% better mileage, plug in when you get a chance, and drives like a Honda. Bring back some of the engineering skills that Honda once stood for. And then start introducing a portfolio of EVs once people are more comfortable with the idea of plugging in. People seeing that they can easily use an EV for their daily errands with the gas engine never starting will eventually sell them on a future EV because that range anxiety will be lessened. The all EV leap is still a bridge too far, especially as recent sales numbers have shown. Baby steps. That's how you win people over.
  • Theflyersfan If this saves (or delays) an expensive carbon brushing off of the valves down the road, I'll take a case. I understand that can be a very expensive bit of scheduled maintenance.
  • Zipper69 A Mini should have 2 doors and 4 cylinders and tires the size of dinner plates.All else is puffery.
  • Theflyersfan Just in time for the weekend!!! Usual suspects A: All EVs are evil golf carts, spewing nothing but virtue signaling about saving the earth, all the while hacking the limbs off of small kids in Africa, money losing pits of despair that no buyer would ever need and anyone that buys one is a raging moron with no brains and the automakers who make them want to go bankrupt.(Source: all of the comments on every EV article here posted over the years)Usual suspects B: All EVs are powered by unicorns and lollypops with no pollution, drive like dreams, all drivers don't mind stopping for hours on end, eating trays of fast food at every rest stop waiting for charges, save the world by using no gas and batteries are friendly to everyone, bugs included. Everyone should torch their ICE cars now and buy a Tesla or Bolt post haste.(Source: all of the comments on every EV article here posted over the years)Or those in the middle: Maybe one of these days, when the charging infrastructure is better, or there are more options that don't cost as much, one will be considered as part of a rational decision based on driving needs, purchasing costs environmental impact, total cost of ownership, and ease of charging.(Source: many on this site who don't jump on TTAC the split second an EV article appears and lives to trash everyone who is a fan of EVs.)
Next