BMW 740Ld To Debut In Chicago, Along With Some Sort Of Plea For Dealers To Not Call It The "LD"

Jack Baruth
by Jack Baruth

Let’s say you have $83,425 sitting around and you want to make the most economical choice possible besides, say, a Tesla, or a brace of Prius Plug-Ins augmented by suitcases of cash. Let’s also say that you’re the type of literal-minded decent human being who never once looked at the back of the mighty 750il and said, “Heh. Seventy-five oil. Heh.”

Well then, my good man, BMW has your car.



The new 740Ld is basically a 740Li, only with BMW’s 3.0-liter “TwinPower” turbo diesel straight-six. We’re expecting 255 hp and a robust 413 lb-ft of torque, likely making the “LD” a bit more sprightly in normal urban driving than the boosted gasoline six in the “Li”.

The vast majority of Siebeners in this country probably go out the door on $899/month leases and this diesel variant isn’t likely to change that pattern. One wonders just how cheerfully the typical demographic for this automobile will adjust to standing in filthy puddles of stagnant diesel fuel at truck stops during cross-country trips. Yes, wealthy people used to swallow the indignities of compression ignition in the 300TD era, but that was because Mercedes-Benz basically forced them to do so — and some percentage of them chose instead to risk the wrath of the Federal government to bring in horrifyingly underpowered W123 “230E” sedans. When significant numbers of people are willing to take a chance on their paid-in-cash Benzos being seized at the docks and thrown into the Atlantic Ocean, just to avoid the miseries of diesel fuel, that’s a pretty solid indicator that the quality-of-life issues associated with Rudolf’s Juice are significant.

In a future where the United States adopts a punitive CO2-emissions-based taxation policy for privately-owned automobiles, perhaps in President Hillary’s second term, this 740Ld will be a guaranteed winner. Until then, it will be a curiosity, driven by people who want to make a point.

Jack Baruth
Jack Baruth

More by Jack Baruth

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 90 comments
  • Kyree Kyree on Jan 27, 2014

    I would much rather BMW come up with some sort of consistent nomenclature that accurately reflects a car's engine size, instead of appeasing people who want the numbers to get larger even as the engines get smaller...which are the same people that wouldn't like the "Ld" end suffix, even though it's consistent with BMW's current messed-up nomenclature. I don't see a problem with 740Ld as it stands.

  • AustinOski AustinOski on Jan 27, 2014

    That ad brings back some sweet memories. My dad had a 3.0s that looked just like it. With a manual gearbox, of course. He later had a 3.0si (and others), but the 3.0s looked better with the smaller bumpers (and it wasn't burgundy, like the si. I can still remember the smell of the leather...

  • CEastwood I have a friend who drives an early aughts Forrester who refuses to get rid of it no matter all it's problems . I believe it's the head gasket eater edition . He takes great pains regularly putting in some additive that is supposed prevent head gasket problems only to be told by his mechanic on the latest timing belt change that the heads are staring to seep . Mechanics must love making money off those cars and their flawed engine design . Below is another satisfied customer of what has to be one of the least reliable Japanese cars .https://www.theautopian.com/i-regret-buying-a-new-subaru/
  • Wjtinfwb 157k is not insignificant, even for a Honda. A lot would depend on the maintenance records and the environment the car was operated in. Up to date maintenance and updated wear items like brakes, shocks, belts, etc. done recently? Where did those 157k miles accumulate? West Texas on open, smooth roads that are relatively easy on the chassis or Michigan, with bomb crater potholes, snow and salt that take their toll on the underpinnings. That Honda 4 will run forever with decent maintenance but the underneath bits deteriorate on a Honda just like they do on a Chevy.
  • Namesakeone Yes, for two reasons: The idea of a robot making decisions based on algorithms does not seem to be in anyone's best interest, and the thought of trucking companies salivating over using a computer to replace the salary of a human driver means a lot more people in the unemployment lines.
  • Bd2 Powertrain reliability of Boxer engines is always questionable. I'll never understand why Subaru held onto them for so long. Smartstream is a solid engine platform as is the Veracruz 3.8L V6.
  • SPPPP I suppose I am afraid of autonomous cars in a certain sense. I prefer to drive myself when I go places. If I ride as a passenger in another driver's car, I can see if that person looks alert and fit for purpose. If that person seems likely to crash, I can intervene, and attempt to bring them back to attention. If there is no human driver, there will probably be no warning signs of an impending crash.But this is less significant than the over-arching fear of humans using autonomous driving as a tool to disempower and devalue other humans. As each generation "can't be trusted" with more and more things, we seem to be turning more passive and infantile. I fear that it will weaken our society and make it more prone to exploitation from within, and/or conquest from the outside.
Next