Reuters: Lutz To Help Chinese Buy Fisker On The Cheap

Bertel Schmitt
by Bertel Schmitt

When former TTAC Editor-in-Chief and now Editor emeritus Edward “Op-Ed” Niedermeyer wrote an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal and warned that GM’s center of gravity shifts more and more to China, GM’s retired multi-role fighter Bob Lutz reamed Ed via Fortune. Now, Bob Lutz himself appears to be an accessory in a deal that transfers U.S. government-financed technology to China for pennies on the dollar. Says Deepa Seetharaman, in-house alternative drivetrain expert at the Reuters Detroit office, in her in-depth article:

“VL Automotive and China’s Wanxiang Group are looking to gain control of Fisker through a prepackaged bankruptcy. This comes alongside a separate push by investors in Europe and Hong Kong, including billionaire Richard Li, to buy out the U.S. Department of Energy’s position in Fisker.”

Here are the players:

Fisker hasn’t made a car since last July, and hasn’t built many before. Fisker hired bankruptcy advisers after firing most of its workforce.

The U.S. Government awarded Fisker a US$529 million green-energy loan in 2010, of which Fisker collected nearly US$192 million until 2011. Then, he government froze the loan.

VL Automotive is a venture between Bob Lutz and his partner, industrialist Gilbert Villarreal, hence the VL. At the Detroit auto show this year, VL Automotive showcased a car called the VL Destino, “which combines the shell of a Fisker with the guts of a Chevrolet Corvette ZR1,” says Reuters. The car is said to cost around $180,000.

Wanxiang is China’s largest automotive components manufacturing company. Wanxiang successfully bid for Fisker’s battery supplier, A123 Systems after the company went bankrupt.. This week, a judge approved the bankruptcy plan for A123.

The government loan is in the way of selling Fisker. “Prospective buyers have been unwilling to assume the obligations spelled out in the loans,” sources told Reuters.

According to Reuters, a deal is being negotiated in which a Hong Kong finance group would buy out the government’s loan, most likely at a steep discount. Then the assets could be sold to Wanxiang and VL. Especially independent Chinese automakers need to export to fill their idle capacities. To be able to compete, they need foreign technology.

Bertel Schmitt
Bertel Schmitt

Bertel Schmitt comes back to journalism after taking a 35 year break in advertising and marketing. He ran and owned advertising agencies in Duesseldorf, Germany, and New York City. Volkswagen A.G. was Bertel's most important corporate account. Schmitt's advertising and marketing career touched many corners of the industry with a special focus on automotive products and services. Since 2004, he lives in Japan and China with his wife <a href="http://www.tomokoandbertel.com"> Tomoko </a>. Bertel Schmitt is a founding board member of the <a href="http://www.offshoresuperseries.com"> Offshore Super Series </a>, an American offshore powerboat racing organization. He is co-owner of the racing team Typhoon.

More by Bertel Schmitt

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 27 comments
  • Steveg35 Steveg35 on May 22, 2013

    Lutz is a blowhard. Crashed his aircraft by forgetting to put the gear down. His buddy Eaton sold out Chrysler to M-B for a big payday. Car Guy? Hardly. He oversaw crap like the Liberty and the Solstice. Ask an Exide employee about his tenure there. They called him no guts Lutz. Love his photo in the R+T column: a big cigar-smoking phony.

    • E46M3_333 E46M3_333 on May 22, 2013

      I agree. This guy is heralded as some sort of automotive genius. From what I see, he couldn't hold a middle manager job where I work. In Detroit, he's the tallest dwarf.

  • Jimbob457 Jimbob457 on May 22, 2013

    The Chinese may be trying to buy Fisker 'on the cheap', as the headline says. This is technically accurate. You could just as well have said: "As a failed attempt at EV, Fisker's corpse is so derelict that the only visible buyer is China, and they are not willing to pay very much despite the fact they (Bank of China and its owner the Chinese Communist Party) have cache of money worth trillions of US dollars. One cannot expect every attempt at innovation to succeed. This unusual US willingness to risk failure at every level in pursuit of success is the envy of the rest of the world. So my opinion is we should sell the Fiskers off for what we can get, and try to keep the commitment of government money limited, as much as possible, to paying for basic research.

  • MaintenanceCosts I wish more vehicles in our market would be at or under 70" wide. Narrowness makes everything easier in the city.
  • El scotto They should be supping with a very, very long spoon.
  • El scotto [list=1][*]Please make an EV that's not butt-ugly. Not Jaguar gorgeous but Buick handsome will do.[/*][*] For all the golf cart dudes: A Tesla S in Plaid mode will be the fastest ride you'll ever take.[/*][*]We have actual EV owners posting on here. Just calmly stated facts and real world experience. This always seems to bring out those who would argue math.[/*][/list=1]For some people an EV will never do, too far out in the country, taking trips where an EV will need recharged, etc. If you own a home and can charge overnight an EV makes perfect sense. You're refueling while you're sleeping.My condo association is allowing owners to install chargers. You have to pay all of the owners of the parking spaces the new electric service will cross. Suggested fee is 100$ and the one getting a charger pays all the legal and filing fees. I held out for a bottle of 30 year old single malt.Perhaps high end apartments will feature reserved parking spaces with chargers in the future. Until then non home owners are relying on public charge and one of my neighbors is in IT and he charges at work. It's call a perk.I don't see company owned delivery vehicles that are EV's. The USPS and the smiley boxes should be the 1st to do this. Nor are any of our mega car dealerships doing this and but of course advertising this fact.I think a great many of the EV haters haven't came to the self-actualization that no one really cares what you drive. I can respect and appreciate what you drive but if I was pushed to answer, no I really don't care what you drive. Before everyone goes into umbrage over my last sentence, I still like cars. Especially yours.I have heated tiles in my bathroom and my kitchen. The two places you're most likely to be barefoot. An EV may fall into to the one less thing to mess with for many people.Macallan for those who were wondering.
  • EBFlex The way things look in the next 5-10 years no. There are no breakthroughs in battery technology coming, the charging infrastructure is essentially nonexistent, and the price of entry is still way too high.As soon as an EV can meet the bar set by ICE in range, refueling times, and price it will take off.
  • Jalop1991 Way to bury the lead. "Toyota to offer two EVs in the states"!
Next