At The Intersection Between Humanity And The Future, Robots Will Be In Control

Jack Baruth
by Jack Baruth

The notion of the crossroads as a sacred place is older than Robert Johnson, older than the blues, older than the automobile or the Romans who laid the first large-scale transportation network. The crossroads contains possibilities, changes, choices. It is where the gods live and the demons dwell. Soon, that may be almost literally true.

A recent Virginia Tech study suggests that the best way for driverless vehicles to handle intersections may be to hand over their decision trees to an “intersection controller” 200 meters or so before they actually reach said intersection. The “intersection controller” will possess local intelligence and will adjust the speed and behavior of incoming vehicles.

… the intersection controller governs the vehicles within 200 meters from the intersection. The vehicles report their physical characteristics, such as power, mass, speed, location, and acceleration.

“The aim of giving complete authority to the controller is to overcome any selfish behavior by an autonomous vehicle and benefit all vehicles in the intersection zone… The controller determines the optimum speed and acceleration at each time step for every vehicle within the intersection zone by processing the input data through a real-time simulator/tool.”

The system will begin testing at a Virginia Tech roundabout in the near future.

Speaking as someone who occasionally designs complex systems in his day job, I can’t decide if the potential for mayhem is made greater by allowing all the driverless cars to make their own wacky decisions or by turning over control to a system which could easily be compromised. If you have ten thousand cars going through an intersection every day, the chances are high that one of them will misbehave, but the others should be able to compensate. A malicious “intersection controller”, on the other hand, could just stack up dead bodies like cordwood until its registers overflowed.

It’s also a certainty that people will figure out how to game the intersection controller for their own benefit. One way would be to program your car to report brake failure 200 meters out. The intersection controller will cheerfully stop all other traffic for safety’s sake and you can just glide through like royalty. Some kid with a laptop can also sit under the intersection controller and generate phantom traffic. If all the traffic is encrypted, it can be recorded and replayed to cause havoc. Alternately, one could impersonate an intersection controller, pull a solid man-in-the-middle attack, and make pretty metal sculptures.

There’s something very touching about the way advocates of increased central control assume that everyone will just happily go along with whatever scheme they’ve dreamed up this week, whether it’s intersection controllers, mandatory smog inspections, or 85-mph speedometers to limit highway exuberance. There are more things in heaven and earth than are dreamt of their philosophy. The crossroads are a place of chaos as well as divinity. Ask Robert Johnson.


Jack Baruth
Jack Baruth

More by Jack Baruth

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 47 comments
  • Sportyaccordy Sportyaccordy on Dec 11, 2012

    As goofy as the govt is, I really doubt the systems will be so unsecure that "some kid with a laptop" would be able to hack into them and wreak havoc By this logic why hasn't this "kid with a laptop" hacked into any other autonomic transportation system? Post reeks of right wing paranoia

  • Landcrusher Landcrusher on Dec 11, 2012

    Interesting comment Sporty. What specifically makes the "kid with a laptop" qualify as "right wing paranoia" rather than regular paranoia?

  • Peter Buying an EV from Toyota is like buying a Bible from Donald Trump. Don’t be surprised if some very important parts are left out.
  • Sheila I have a 2016 Kia Sorento that just threw a rod out of the engine case. Filed a claim for new engine and was denied…..due to a loop hole that was included in the Class Action Engine Settlement so Hyundai and Kia would be able to deny a large percentage of cars with prematurely failed engines. It’s called the KSDS Improvement Campaign. Ever hear of such a thing? It’s not even a Recall, although they know these engines are very dangerous. As unknowing consumers load themselves and kids in them everyday. Are their any new Class Action Lawsuits that anyone knows of?
  • Alan Well, it will take 30 years to fix Nissan up after the Renault Alliance reduced Nissan to a paltry mess.I think Nissan will eventually improve.
  • Alan This will be overpriced for what it offers.I think the "Western" auto manufacturers rip off the consumer with the Thai and Chinese made vehicles.A Chinese made Model 3 in Australia is over $70k AUD(for 1995 $45k USD) which is far more expensive than a similar Chinesium EV of equal or better quality and loaded with goodies.Chinese pickups are $20k to $30k cheaper than Thai built pickups from Ford and the Japanese brands. Who's ripping who off?
  • Alan Years ago Jack Baruth held a "competition" for a piece from the B&B on the oddest pickup story (or something like that). I think 5 people were awarded the prizes.I never received mine, something about being in Australia. If TTAC is global how do you offer prizes to those overseas or are we omitted on the sly from competing?In the end I lost significant respect for Baruth.
Next