Chinese Interests Kill Opel-Peugeot Deal, Endanger Opel's Already Shaky Future

Bertel Schmitt
by Bertel Schmitt

GM is backing out of plans to share the Opel Insignia platform with its partner PSA, says Der Spiegel. It was planned that PSA will build a mid-sized Peugeot and Citroen with next gen Insignia underpinnings. The cars would have been made at Opel’s Rüsselsheim factory. Together with the Opel model, the cars would have filled the available capacity. Scratch that plan. It wasn’t killed because it was a bad idea. It was killed because Buick and especially GM China complained, says the magazine.

With the deal sacrificed to Buick sensitivities, the Rüsselsheim plant is left with way too much capacity, Opel executives told Der Spiegel. The managers also question where the sense of any cooperation with PSA may be.

An Opel spokesman, contacted by Reuters, did not want to comment on model plans, but played down expectations that a final deal would include shared manufacturing.

“It would be premature to assume that anything had been agreed upon before and has now been reversed,” the spokesman said, adding that discussions were continuing with an emphasis on cooperation in purchasing, logistics and product development.

If the story is true, then the deal most likely has been torpedoed from China alone. Neither Citroen nor Peugeot sell in the U.S. and won’t compete with Buick here. In China, PSA has a joint venture with Dongfeng, and a new one with Changan. Both central government-owned companies are bitter rivals of Shanghai-owned GM joint venture partner SAIC. Eventually, those mid-sized Peugeots and Citroens would be be made in China.

The way it looks, Opel’s future may have become the victim of internecine Chinese politics, which gain way too much influence on GM. Volkswagen handles its Chinese joint venture partners much better. There would have been loud laughter in Wolfsburg if China would have tried to influence European model politics.

Bertel Schmitt
Bertel Schmitt

Bertel Schmitt comes back to journalism after taking a 35 year break in advertising and marketing. He ran and owned advertising agencies in Duesseldorf, Germany, and New York City. Volkswagen A.G. was Bertel's most important corporate account. Schmitt's advertising and marketing career touched many corners of the industry with a special focus on automotive products and services. Since 2004, he lives in Japan and China with his wife <a href="http://www.tomokoandbertel.com"> Tomoko </a>. Bertel Schmitt is a founding board member of the <a href="http://www.offshoresuperseries.com"> Offshore Super Series </a>, an American offshore powerboat racing organization. He is co-owner of the racing team Typhoon.

More by Bertel Schmitt

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 9 comments
  • Analoca Analoca on Sep 05, 2012

    Statement While we will not comment on all the details because of the speculative nature of the story "GM hampers alliance between Opel and PSA" published on Spiegel Online, we want to clarify some general facts. In contrast to what Spiegel Online claims, this is not an alliance between Opel and PSA, but a global alliance between GM and PSA. And one of the main reasons why GM entered the alliance with PSA was to create synergies in and for Europe and therefore support the Opel/Vauxhall business. Not the opposite. From the start, the alliance has been focused on three pillars : logistics, purchasing and product development. After an agreement on logistics was reached earlier this year, we are now working on a purchasing agreement and we are studying a number of engineering projects. From those under study, we will select those that make most sense and that are ultimately resulting in the best possible cars for our customers. No decisions have been made, so any claim about alleged previous or new plans, are entirely wrong. Manufacturing projects are not part of the existing Alliance agreement so we have nothing to say about manufacturing.

  • Philadlj Philadlj on Sep 05, 2012

    Just curious: what does Wolfsburg have that GM doesn't that would allow them to "laugh off" interference by their Chinese joint ventures? Also, forgive my ignorance, but if the central government wanted to get rid of "bitter rival" SAIC, couldn't they, considering all Chinese businesses essentially exist at the pleasure of the ruling communist party?

  • Tim Myers Can you tell me why in the world Mazda uses the ugliest colors on the MX5? I have a 2017 in Red and besides Black or White, the other colors are horrible for a sports car. I constantly hear this complaint. I wish someone would tell whoever makes theses decisions that they need a more sports car colors available. They’d probably sell a lot more of them. Just saying.
  • Dartman EBFlex will soon be able to buy his preferred brand!
  • Mebgardner I owned 4 different Z cars beginning with a 1970 model. I could already row'em before buying the first one. They were light, fast, well powered, RWD, good suspenders, and I loved working on them myself when needed. Affordable and great styling, too. On the flip side, parts were expensive and mostly only available in a dealers parts dept. I could live with those same attributes today, but those days are gone long gone. Safety Regulations and Import Regulations, while good things, will not allow for these car attributes at the price point I bought them at.I think I will go shop a GT-R.
  • Lou_BC Honda plans on investing 15 billion CAD. It appears that the Ontario government and Federal government will provide tax breaks and infrastructure upgrades to the tune of 5 billion CAD. This will cover all manufacturing including a battery plant. Honda feels they'll save 20% on production costs having it all localized and in house.As @ Analoggrotto pointed out, another brilliant TTAC press release.
  • 28-Cars-Later "Its cautious approach, which, along with Toyota’s, was criticized for being too slow, is now proving prescient"A little off topic, but where are these critics today and why aren't they being shamed? Why are their lunkheaded comments being memory holed? 'Who&nbsp;controls the past&nbsp;controls the future. Who controls the present&nbsp;controls the past.' -Orwell, 1984
Next