CAW, Auto Makers, Kick Off Talks

Derek Kreindler
by Derek Kreindler

The Canadian Auto Workers and the Big Three have kicked off labor talks, with the CAW taking a hard line against concessions – a position that some say, could lead to a lack of future in investment in Canadian auto manufacturing.

While the CAW wants guaranteed wage and cost of living increases, the automakers want the CAW to accept a deal similar to what the UAW agreed on; no wage or living cost increases, but workers will be involved in a profit-sharing agreement.

One of TTAC’s Big Three sources, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, said that unions are reluctant to accept the profit-sharing agreement because they are concerned that their efforts at building a high quality car could be bungled by a poor decision made by the marketing team, and the product could fail. In that situation, profit-sharing wouldn’t be much of a help.

The CAW made a number of concessions to automakers during the 2008-2009 negotiations, which occured in the thick of the bailout. The union is hoping to gain some ground over what was lost in previous negotiations, and is demanding that auto makers stop asking for concessions from the workers.

Unfortunately, the CAW is in an especially poor bargaining position; a strong Canadian dollar, high labor costs and a willingness by automakers to close Canadian plants doesn’t give CAW President Ken Lewenza much leverage in terms of negotiating a deal with the auto makers. And botched negotiations could have drastic consequences for the future of Canada’s auto manufacturing sector.

University of Windsor professor Tony Faria, an auto industry expert, told CBC News

“I think if the CAW pushes too hard, we’re going to see no new investment in Ontario from the Detroit 3, if they can work out a deal that is more satisfactory to both sides then I think there’s a chance we can get investment here and retain, and maybe grow some jobs.”

Derek Kreindler
Derek Kreindler

More by Derek Kreindler

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 19 comments
  • Johnny Canada Johnny Canada on Aug 17, 2012

    I'm sure most CAW members have already forgotten Ken Lewenza's impressive negotiating skills at the London Ontario Caterpillar (Electro-Motive) facility. Even with 99% of the Canadian media acting like spin-doctors for the Union position, Cat pulled out and moved it all to Indiana.

    • Lorenzo Lorenzo on Aug 18, 2012

      That should be a reminder to Mr. Lewenza that he needs to factor in the fact that there's a low wage country with nine times Canada's population on Canada's southern border. Looking south, he should be even more concerned, watching a communications union call a two-day demonstration strike, only to see the strikers holding up signs blaming the union leadership for costing them two days' pay.

  • Freddy M Freddy M on Aug 20, 2012

    So the CAW doesn't want to accept Profit Sharing which is a better distribution of the company's earnings, and more responsible given the state of the economy, yet they want guaranteed increases (which many private sector workers don't have) which can only drain the company's coffers particularly if the company isn't doing well... ... yes that's very sustainable.

  • Zipper69 A Mini should have 2 doors and 4 cylinders and tires the size of dinner plates.All else is puffery.
  • Theflyersfan Just in time for the weekend!!! Usual suspects A: All EVs are evil golf carts, spewing nothing but virtue signaling about saving the earth, all the while hacking the limbs off of small kids in Africa, money losing pits of despair that no buyer would ever need and anyone that buys one is a raging moron with no brains and the automakers who make them want to go bankrupt.(Source: all of the comments on every EV article here posted over the years)Usual suspects B: All EVs are powered by unicorns and lollypops with no pollution, drive like dreams, all drivers don't mind stopping for hours on end, eating trays of fast food at every rest stop waiting for charges, save the world by using no gas and batteries are friendly to everyone, bugs included. Everyone should torch their ICE cars now and buy a Tesla or Bolt post haste.(Source: all of the comments on every EV article here posted over the years)Or those in the middle: Maybe one of these days, when the charging infrastructure is better, or there are more options that don't cost as much, one will be considered as part of a rational decision based on driving needs, purchasing costs environmental impact, total cost of ownership, and ease of charging.(Source: many on this site who don't jump on TTAC the split second an EV article appears and lives to trash everyone who is a fan of EVs.)
  • The Oracle Some commenters have since passed away when this series got started.
  • The Oracle Honda is generally conservative yet persistent, this will work in one form or fashion.
  • Theflyersfan I love this car. I want this car. No digital crap, takes skill to drive, beat it up, keep on going.However, I just looked up the cost of transmission replacement:$16,999 before labor. That's the price for an OEM Mitsubishi SST. Wow. It's obvious from reading everything the seller has done, he has put a lot of time, energy, and love into this car, but it's understandable that $17,000 before labor, tax, and fees is a bridge too far. And no one wants to see this car end up in a junkyard. The last excellent Mitsubishi before telling Subaru that they give up. And the rear facing car seat in the back - it's not every day you see that in an Evo! Get the kid to daycare in record time! Comments are reading that the price is best offer. It's been a while since Tim put something up that had me really thinking about it, even something over 1,000 miles away. But I've loved the Evo for a long time... And if you're going to scratch out the front plate image, you might want to do the rear one as well!
Next