International Crisis Reaches Brazil. Government Action Knocks Prices Down.

Marcelo de Vasconcellos
by Marcelo de Vasconcellos

Brazil has historically been a difficult place to do business. The government keeps foreigners out as best as it can, and that extends to vehicle importers as well. In the car business, you are welcome to market your wares as long as you build locally. Imported cars have always been expensive, and the costs are set to rise, as the government has taken new measures that affect both local makers and importers. Read this very closely before you ask for import restrictions into your country.

On Monday, May 21, Finance Minister Guido Mantega announced a series of measures. A 14 percent drop in car sales, a record high 5.7 percent delinquency rate on car payments and an average of more than 40 days to move the metal were some of the justifications for the intervention. I wouldn’t call you a cynic if you believed that this action was taken mainly because the automotive industry is famous for its lobbying prowess and politics. Local elections are right around the corner, and the government finds itself in the middle of a debilitating scandal involving public contracts. A McCarthy-style Investigative Commission has been set up in Congress, and the circus act is on full swing in Brasilia. Most analysts agree that this commission will most likely get results about as valuable as McCarthy’s.

With some close races to be had, especially in the all-important city of São Paulo, which to the glee of our politicians holds the third largest purse in the country, it wouldn’t be too far-fetched to imagine the automotive industry threatening mass firings and a government cowed into spreading some cheer, divert attention from its troubles and avoid unemployment and loss of votes.

Measures included in the government’s pacote de bondades, as the Brazilian media likes to call such things, involve cutting taxes. The Minister mentioned that the government will pass up 2.1 billion reais in uncollected taxes. Cars will now incur less IPI (Tax on Industrialized Products,) measured according to displacement, vehicle class, its fuel requirements and country of origin. As a peace offering to OEMs that import, rather than build locally, imports will also benefit from lower taxes – as long as they have a displacement of 2000 cc or less (see tables below). Supposedly that’s for ecological and economic reasons.

A cut in the IOF (Tax on Financial Operations) was approved to stimulate consumers to take more credit and pay longer plans. This way, more costumers will be in a condition to get themselves into further trouble, I mean, take on more debt. Previously, consumers paid an IOF of 2.5 percent a year. This has been cut to 1.5 percent. Imagine that instead of taking the interest of your alleged home equity loan off your taxes, you would have to pay additional interest to Uncle Sam. Inconceivable? Welcome to Brazil.

Banks will also have to make fewer compulsory deposits. This will free up about 18 billion reais for the banks to apply in long-term financial operations. According to the Central Bank, this figure represents 10 percent of all the credit available in the car segment.

Cars produced locally or in Mercosur or MexicoCategory/DisplacementFuelNew IPI TaxPrevious IPI TaxUp to 1.0LAny0%7%Between 1.1 and 2.0LEthanol and flex fuel5.50%11%Between 1.1 and 2.0LGasoline6.50%13%Above 2.0LAny25%25%Commercial VehiclesAny1%4%Cars Imported from countries other than Mexico and MercosurCategory/DisplacementFuelNew IPI TaxPrevious IPI TaxUp to 1.0LAny30%37%Between 1.1 and 2.0LEthanol and flex fuel35.50%41%Between 1.1 and 2.0LGasoline36.50%43%Above 2.0LAny55%55%Commercial VehiclesAny31%34%

In Minister Mantega’s explanation, he warned that the IPI reduction would be valid only until August 31. At that point, he seemed like any small time dealer shouting, “Buy now!” on TV. The IOF tax and reduction on compulsory deposits are good for an undetermined amount of time. He stressed that makers had agreed to sacrifice for the good of the country and agreed to reduce list prices anywhere from 1.5 to 2.5 percent depending on model. Buyers of imported cars above 2 liters are out of luck. They keep paying a dizzying 55 percent tax on their cars.

As analysts have pointed out, delinquency on car loan payments has almost doubled from a year ago. That means many consumers are already strapped for cash and heavily in debt. The Minister stressed that the government expected its measures to trigger a reduction of around 10 percent in prices for cars in the 1.0L category. For the higher displacement cars expectations hovered around a 6 to 8 percent drop. Also, the lowered IOF and easier credit would naturally lower interest rates, extend the number of installments and reduce the necessary outlay demanded by each installment.

Marcelo de Vasconcellos
Marcelo de Vasconcellos

More by Marcelo de Vasconcellos

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 16 comments
  • TonyJZX TonyJZX on May 30, 2012

    i think this sort of article is a great thing because it highlights just what economic conditions exist around the world i know most places are anti-car... even the English speaking west such as the North Americas have some odd anti-car legislations and I hear some places in the EU have a 5,000 euro yearly tax on cars over 5.0 liters... it would be nice to see just how bad it is around the world i know singapore pretty much sucks and of course everyone knows of the 2.5 euro per liter petrol costs in some places

    • MrWhopee MrWhopee on May 30, 2012

      Singapore has to be anti-car, because of circumstances. It's a really small country with relatively prosperous citizens. If cars are priced like they were in the US everyone would own cars and drive everywhere. The city/country would be inundated with cars, and they can't go anywhere. Thus the high tax, road pricing, and such to keep car population manageable. Plus they have excellent public transportation!

  • Carbiz Carbiz on May 31, 2012

    ... and yet Brazil has a very healthy industrial capacity. GM, Ford, VW... they all seem quite happy to build vehicles there. Perhaps Sao Paulo would not be the industrial heartland it became without these disincentives? Maybe a generation ago, Brazilieros were happy to accept jobs and compete with Europe and the United States on the wage front, but now they have a burgeoning middle class - and who wants to compete with Thailand or Korea for wages? Why would Brazliieros have a problem with a Camaro costing R160,000? If you want one bad enough, buy it. Otherwise, buy a Chevrolet or VW built in Brazil. Maybe Brasilia is happy to sign all the trade deals with China it can, but they are not so stupid as to hand over all their jobs, too.

  • W Conrad I'm not afraid of them, but they aren't needed for everyone or everywhere. Long haul and highway driving sure, but in the city, nope.
  • Jalop1991 In a manner similar to PHEV being the correct answer, I declare RPVs to be the correct answer here.We're doing it with certain aircraft; why not with cars on the ground, using hardware and tools like Telsa's "FSD" or GM's "SuperCruise" as the base?Take the local Uber driver out of the car, and put him in a professional centralized environment from where he drives me around. The system and the individual car can have awareness as well as gates, but he's responsible for the driving.Put the tech into my car, and let me buy it as needed. I need someone else to drive me home; hit the button and voila, I've hired a driver for the moment. I don't want to drive 11 hours to my vacation spot; hire the remote pilot for that. When I get there, I have my car and he's still at his normal location, piloting cars for other people.The system would allow for driver rest period, like what's required for truckers, so I might end up with multiple people driving me to the coast. I don't care. And they don't have to be physically with me, therefore they can be way cheaper.Charge taxi-type per-mile rates. For long drives, offer per-trip rates. Offer subscriptions, including miles/hours. Whatever.(And for grins, dress the remote pilots all as Johnnie.)Start this out with big rigs. Take the trucker away from the long haul driving, and let him be there for emergencies and the short haul parts of the trip.And in a manner similar to PHEVs being discredited, I fully expect to be razzed for this brilliant idea (not unlike how Alan Kay wasn't recognized until many many years later for his Dynabook vision).
  • B-BodyBuick84 Not afraid of AV's as I highly doubt they will ever be %100 viable for our roads. Stop-and-go downtown city or rush hour highway traffic? I can see that, but otherwise there's simply too many variables. Bad weather conditions, faded road lines or markings, reflective surfaces with glare, etc. There's also the issue of cultural norms. About a decade ago there was actually an online test called 'The Morality Machine' one could do online where you were in control of an AV and choose what action to take when a crash was inevitable. I think something like 2.5 million people across the world participated? For example, do you hit and most likely kill the elderly couple strolling across the crosswalk or crash the vehicle into a cement barrier and almost certainly cause the death of the vehicle occupants? What if it's a parent and child? In N. America 98% of people choose to hit the elderly couple and save themselves while in Asia, the exact opposite happened where 98% choose to hit the parent and child. Why? Cultural differences. Asia puts a lot of emphasis on respecting their elderly while N. America has a culture of 'save/ protect the children'. Are these AV's going to respect that culture? Is a VW Jetta or Buick Envision AV going to have different programming depending on whether it's sold in Canada or Taiwan? how's that going to effect legislation and legal battles when a crash inevitibly does happen? These are the true barriers to mass AV adoption, and in the 10 years since that test came out, there has been zero answers or progress on this matter. So no, I'm not afraid of AV's simply because with the exception of a few specific situations, most avenues are going to prove to be a dead-end for automakers.
  • Mike Bradley Autonomous cars were developed in Silicon Valley. For new products there, the standard business plan is to put a barely-functioning product on the market right away and wait for the early-adopter customers to find the flaws. That's exactly what's happened. Detroit's plan is pretty much the opposite, but Detroit isn't developing this product. That's why dealers, for instance, haven't been trained in the cars.
  • Dartman https://apnews.com/article/artificial-intelligence-fighter-jets-air-force-6a1100c96a73ca9b7f41cbd6a2753fdaAutonomous/Ai is here now. The question is implementation and acceptance.
Next