Vellum Venom: 2012 BMW 328i Sedan

Sajeev Mehta
by Sajeev Mehta

You want a challenge? Try sitting in a design studio when tasked with redesigning an automotive icon. I especially enjoyed these tasks, because you could to honor a brand and maybe even go retro on your vellum. If I was still in that game, I’d go heavy on the E36. That was my favorite of the 3-series, because it had a proper BMW look, without being tiny and cheap looking like the E30. And while this isn’t a retro 3-series by any stretch, the toning down of Chris Bangle’s flame surfacing continues. And that’s a good thing.

I love Texas, except for our need for a front license plate. And while the new 3 is far from the worst offender (the second-gen Chrysler Concorde takes that), this particular license plate is absolutely vulgar. Luckily, the rest of the package looks surprisingly aggressive, yet restrained. It looks like the Ultimate Driving Machine, and the headlight shot at the beginning really proves the point: note how the kidney grilles are pulled back like a dog beginning to growl at you! That is a nice touch, and the nose has a proper sports sedan flavor to it.

An important word to use when trying to sound smart about design: swage line. You see them starting from the hood bulge, fender tops and the middle/bottom of the fenders. The new 3 has a ton of them, and they do work here. Usually.

Swage lines are really, really good at hiding the visual bulk of today’s stupid-tall vehicles. Here are three of them in action. Note how the bottom one blends into the door handles at first, ending into a crease at the tail lights. It is a neat touch that even the last-gen Ford Focus (US-spec) used to keep from looking as hideous as the Chrysler Sebring. Not a big problem for Bavaria’s finest.

Yep, that’s the Hofmeister Kink in full effect…son! I always loved this element in BMWs, but the trimming on this C-pillar looks a little mundane in person. Maybe that’s because other wanna-be BMW sedans on the market have that kinky-ness, and the 3 series is bigger and visually heavier. My other gripe is the door cut line, the sharp-straightness isn’t nearly as elegant as the curves elsewhere. Bend that line around the wheel well, and make the rear door look more like the leg and hips of a lovely lady!

I like the use of negative area around the trunk and rear bumper, especially how the decklid almost looks like it has an integral spoiler. The rear door cut-line looks a bit more curvaceous from this angle, and another swage line from the C-pillar reaches out to the (lightly) Bangled butt. Notice the other line that blends the tall (lower) elements of the rear bumper with the round (upper) elements above the bumper. And more lines at the bottom of the bumper, near the exhaust.

If this car was a skirt-wearing woman walking in a summer breeze, she’d be wearing something made by an extremely hyper seamstress. Chill out already with the seams!

The busy-ness continues. The new 3 is quite tall, just like all modern sedans. Which bothers me, but the extra width (and elongated tail lights) keeps this whip from having a Buffalo Butt. Also note how these tires (225mm wide) look pretty skinny. Who here remembers when 225mm tires looked absolutely wicked-thick on cars from the 1980s? I’m looking at you, BMW 635i.

Things are getting a little lumpy and bumpy when you get close. Could be worse, this could be the last-gen Camry.

Technology is great, except when it isn’t. The BMW shark fin is rather ludicrous. How I long for the days when antennas fit between the two panes of glass in a windshield!

More lumps and bumps, to hide that CUV-look. Those swage lines do a fair job of hiding the new 3’s height, but this is getting silly! Even body builders don’t flex their pecs this much! My kingdom for shorter (height) sports sedans!

Can you imagine this car with less ripples? Perhaps one day the E36 design aesthetic will come back into vogue in BMW’s design studio, and maybe we’ll have platforms that sit low enough to take advantage of it.

Sajeev Mehta
Sajeev Mehta

More by Sajeev Mehta

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 49 comments
  • Robc123 Robc123 on Mar 30, 2012

    hideous. I see why the 3 is the new 5 and the 1 the new 3.

  • Yes_but_maybe Yes_but_maybe on Mar 30, 2012

    I've pointed out before that the front plate requirement would be a lot easier if the front plate were just a really high quality bumper sticker instead (and it can be more bumper sticker size, as opposed to license plate sized.)

  • Dr.Nick What about Infiniti? Some of those cars might be interesting, whereas not much at Nissan interest me other than the Z which is probably big bucks.
  • Dave Holzman My '08 Civic (stick, 159k on the clock) is my favorite car that I've ever owned. If I had to choose between the current Civic and Corolla, I'd test drive 'em (with stick), and see how they felt. But I'd be approaching this choice partial to the Civic. I would not want any sort of automatic transmission, or the turbo engine.
  • Merc190 I would say Civic Si all the way if it still revved to 8300 rpm with no turbo. But nowadays I would pick the Corolla because I think they have a more clear idea on their respective models identity and mission. I also believe Toyota has a higher standard for quality.
  • Dave Holzman I think we're mixing up a few things here. I won't swear to it, but I'd be damned surprised if they were putting fire retardant in the seats of any cars from the '50s, or even the '60s. I can't quite conjure up the new car smell of the '57 Chevy my parents bought on October 17th of that year... but I could do so--vividly--until the last five years or so. I loved that scent, and when I smelled it, I could see the snow on Hollis Street in Cambridge Mass, as one or the other parent got ready to drive me to nursery school, and I could remember staring up at the sky on Christmas Eve, 1957, wondering if I might see Santa Claus flying overhead in his sleigh. No, I don't think the fire retardant on the foam in the seats of 21st (and maybe late 20th) century cars has anything to do with new car smell. (That doesn't mean new car small lacked toxicity--it probably had some.)
  • ToolGuy Is this a website or a podcast with homework? You want me to answer the QOTD before I listen to the podcast? Last time I worked on one of our vehicles (2010 RAV4 2.5L L4) was this past week -- replaced the right front passenger window regulator (only problem turned out to be two loose screws, but went ahead and installed the new part), replaced a bulb in the dash, finally ordered new upper dash finishers (non-OEM) because I cracked one of them ~2 years ago.Looked at the mileage (157K) and scratched my head and proactively ordered plugs, coils, PCV valve, air filter and a spare oil filter, plus a new oil filter housing (for the weirdo cartridge-type filter). Those might go in tomorrow. Is this interesting to you? It ain't that interesting to me. 😉The more intriguing part to me, is I have noticed some 'blowby' (but is it) when the oil filler cap is removed which I don't think was there before. But of course I'm old and forgetful. Is it worth doing a compression test? Leakdown test? Perhaps if a guy were already replacing the plugs...
Next