China Cranks Up Its Car Export Machine. Thank You, America. Merci, France

Bertel Schmitt
by Bertel Schmitt

Quite ironically, foreign carmakers, namely GM and now French PSA, help China kick-start its ailing export machine.

Everybody had been hysterical about cheap Chinese cars that would soon flood the market, but it didn’t happen. Quite the opposite is happening: Joint venture brands, led by General Motors, are grabbing a larger and larger share of the Chinese market. And foreigners are gearing up to get China a chunk of the world market.

Car exports from China still suck. According to data released by the CAAM, China exported only 625,200 vehicles from January through September, and of those, only 346,700 were passenger vehicles. In the same time, China imported 728,700 cars, and most of them of the higher priced variety. This irritates the Chinese government to no end, but there is not much they can or want to do. At the Chengdu confab, officials officially admitted that the domestic Chinese car industry is not ready yet for the global market.

We have been saying it for a while: The only way to increase exports from China is to export joint venture cars made in China.

The company that had been leading this push oddly is General Motors, the company which still has shareholders in Washington and at the UAW for which Chinese exports are a – well – red flag. Early this year , GM started to export its made-in-China Sail. Only to South America, but soon also to Africa, Middle East and Eastern Europe. When we wrote about this, we said this would start a trend amongst of their joint ventures, and it sure did.

Reuters reports that joint venture with France’s PSA and China’s Changan has big export plans. According to the report, the JV “plans to sell premium cars in China, the world’s biggest auto market, and in some overseas markets.” Not cheap cars. Premium cars.

The JV will set up a research and development center to develop its own brand, as well as the Peugeot and Changan brands. And it plans to export all.

“It is the first joint venture to be allowed to set up an overseas production base and operate the export of multiple brands,” the company said in a statement.

The JV will most likely start with the Citroen DS line, debuted at the 2011 Shanghai auto show.

Swallowing the national pride and using foreigners as export vehicles makes sense for China. The same strategy contributed a lot to the Indian industry which turns into an export powerhouse, as we speak.

Bertel Schmitt
Bertel Schmitt

Bertel Schmitt comes back to journalism after taking a 35 year break in advertising and marketing. He ran and owned advertising agencies in Duesseldorf, Germany, and New York City. Volkswagen A.G. was Bertel's most important corporate account. Schmitt's advertising and marketing career touched many corners of the industry with a special focus on automotive products and services. Since 2004, he lives in Japan and China with his wife <a href="http://www.tomokoandbertel.com"> Tomoko </a>. Bertel Schmitt is a founding board member of the <a href="http://www.offshoresuperseries.com"> Offshore Super Series </a>, an American offshore powerboat racing organization. He is co-owner of the racing team Typhoon.

More by Bertel Schmitt

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 8 comments
  • Nuvista Nuvista on Nov 20, 2011
    We have been saying it for a while: The only way to increase exports from China is to export joint venture cars made in China. Not the only way, but a prudent first step to ensure that the cars are up to international safety and quality standards by leveraging the expertise of foreign automakers. The Chinese companies will eventually get their act together like the Japanese and Korean automakers. The other drivers are that the foreign companies want to take advantage of lower manufacturing costs in China and reduce currency exchange risks.
  • Jeffzekas Jeffzekas on Nov 21, 2011

    First the Chinese will do joint deals... then, once they have mastered our technology, they will nationalize foreign assets, sell below cost, and then, after wiping out competitors, control the industry. China will have industrial jobs, and the US will have nothing but minimum wage service industry work. Winning!

  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Off-road fluff on vehicles that should not be off road needs to die.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Saw this posted on social media; “Just bought a 2023 Tundra with the 14" screen. Let my son borrow it for the afternoon, he connected his phone to listen to his iTunes.The next day my insurance company raised my rates and added my son to my policy. The email said that a private company showed that my son drove the vehicle. He already had his own vehicle that he was insuring.My insurance company demanded he give all his insurance info and some private info for proof. He declined for privacy reasons and my insurance cancelled my policy.These new vehicles with their tech are on condition that we give up our privacy to enter their world. It's not worth it people.”
Next