GM, UAW Reach New Contract, Spring Hill Plant To Re-Open

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

As predicted, the hand-wringing over Sergio Marchionne’s letter to Bob King was not enough to derail the basic motivations for the UAW to reach new deals with the automakers. Last night the union agreed to a tentative agreement with GM, its pattern target for this, the first round of negotiations since the bailout. That agreement must be approved by the union rank-and-file, but if ratified, Reuters reports that it includes

  • The re-opening of the idled Spring Hill, TN plant to build an unspecified “new product”
  • $5,000 signing bonuses (at a cost to GM of $245m)
  • According to the NYT, “significant improvements to health care benefits” are also part of the deal
  • According to AN [sub], the union “successfully fought back efforts to make major changes — and weaken — our retirement plan.”

What’s not yet clear is whether entry-level “Tier Two” workers, who make half what their “Tier One” brothers make, got a raise. Though it’s clear that GM and the UAW worked to avoid major increases to fixed costs by concentrating on jobs and profit-sharing bonus checks, the NYT confirms that the union was asking for some kind of entry-level raise. Given that no outlet is confirming any such Tier Two raise, though, it seems as though the UAW’s culture of seniority-over-solidarity has won out. We’ll report on details as they emerge, which is likely to happen as locals ratify the contract over the next ten days.

And though the UAW still faces battles with a feisty Marchionne and a wary Ford negotiating team, union President Bob King still has an eye on the big picture. Telling Bloomberg that he’s “re-committed” to the goal of organizing non-union transplant factories, he argues

As long as unionized workers are being forced to compete with nonunion workers who in most cases receive lower pay and benefits — many in temporary jobs — there will continue to be a downward pressure on the wages and benefits of all autoworkers.

In a recent conversation with Bloomberg, CAW President Buzz Hargrove essentially argued that the automakers would give up little in this round of negotiations. The key then, was finding things the union wanted that didn’t really cost GM that much. In that light, the re-opening of Spring Hill makes a lot of sense. It’s considered one of GM’s better, more modern plants, and it gives the UAW a bastion in Tennessee, where Nissan and Volkswagen both have new, non-union plants. The problem: unless the union was able to negotiate an entry-level wage hike, new hires at Spring Hill will make less than many of their non-union counterparts [sub] at VW Chattanooga and Nissan Smyrna. At that point, having a UAW plant in the South doesn’t especially help the union’s cause.

Caught between bailed-out automakers that it can’t be too aggressive with and non-union workers who show no signs of wanting or needing representation, this agreement doesn’t change the UAW’s basic predicament. We’ll see what the final details look like when the locals approve the deal, but it might not be too early to say that Detroit’s automakers will have four relatively easy years on this contract.


Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 25 comments
  • Cheezeweggie Cheezeweggie on Sep 18, 2011

    Does the UAW thinks they can antagonize Nissan in Smyrna via nearby Spring Hill and rally the troops to organize ?

  • Mikey Mikey on Sep 18, 2011

    Its the workers at Nissan that have the final say. I can't see where using antagonizing tactics will contribute to a yes vote.

  • FreedMike Frickin' Miami. Closest thing we have to Dubai in this country, for sure.
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh Pay money to be inundated in Adverts for a car that breaks when you sneeze? no
  • Laflamcs My wife got a new 500 Turbo in 2015. Black exterior with an incredible red leather interior and a stick! The glass sunroof was epic and it was just about the whole roof that seemed to roll back. Anyway, that little bugger was an absolute blast to drive. Loved being run hard and shifted fast. Despite its small exterior dimensions, one could pile a lot into it. She remember stocking up at COSTCO one time when a passerby in the parking lot looked at her full cart and asked "Will it all fit?" It did. We had wonderful times with that car and many travels. It was reliable in the years we owned it and had TONS of character lacking in most "sporty" car. Loved the Italian handling, steering, and shift action. We had to trade it in after our daughter came along in 2018 (too small for 3 vacationers). She traded it in for a Jeep Renegade Latitude 6 speed, in which we can still feel a bit of that Italian heritage in the aforementioned driving qualities. IIRC, the engine in this Abarth is the same as in our Renegade. We still talk about that little 500..........
  • Rochester If I could actually afford an Aston Martin, I would absolutely consider living in an Aston themed condo.
  • Redapple2 I ve slept on it. I would take one on a 3 yr lease for $199/mo- ($1000 down total). Evil gm Vampire gave me this deal in 2012.
Next