Rent, Lease, Sell or Keep: 2002 Saturn L200

by Steven Lang

Published: January 20th, 2011

rent lease sell or keep 2002 saturn l200

What killed Saturn? Blandness. An unending sea of uninspiring designs and sibling ripoff’s destroyed what could have been GM’s most successful project of the last 30 years. Of course they’re not alone in the branding malaise. Ford had Mercury. Chrysler had Plymouth. A lot of folks here would argue that Toyota’s Scion is becoming a living testament to compromises that yield a death defining brand. Throw in Acura’s (lack of) reputation, Infiniti and Kia during their low points, and even the winners can sometimes be losers. Which means that with no cache, a Theft Recovery title, and 93k on the odometer, I bought it cheap. $1600. Therefore I can…

Rent: I can probably rent this car for quite a long time. A semi-efficient Ecotec 4-cylinder engine combined with a powertrain and interior that is available in multitude at the pull-a-part’s means that it wouldn’t take that much to keep it running. But then you also have cheap interior parts that simply can not stand abuse. Saturns are one leap ahead of VW’s and Kia’sfrom the same era. But that’s not saying much. With this one I would look at renting it for $140 a week.

Lease/Finance: $700 down and $60 a week for 18 months. I can see that happening with this vehicle since I already have an L300 with the same terms. The L300 had a 3.0L V6 that was also found in the Cadillac Catera. For those of you who don’t know, the Catera’s engine is so feared at the auctions that only a Chrysler with a 2.7L is more repugnant. I spent money to bring the 3.0L:up to date on maintenance and now, it works. But most folks only look at these vehicles as a get-around car. The four cylinder model is far better.

Sell: $3500 in tax season is a good possibility. I may settle at the $3000 mark for a quick profit. This type of vehicle is just not among my favorites. Should it be? I think it may be too close to that borderline where marginal vehicles can yield lower than optimal returns. Perhaps I’ll just wait and see if it sells or leases first?

Keep: Why? Yes I would have minimal depreciation for the next 10 years and the gas cost wouldn’t be as bad as most other cars. My wife hasn’t a care in the world about the car she drives. She realizes that her footwear is going to have a bigger impact on her life. So it wouldn’t be impossible to keep this appliance in the garage and just simply drive it. God knows it would be more worthwhile to own than the Bravada. We have two Hondas at the moment, a late model Civic and the 1st gen Insight. I like them a whole lot better than this midsized mushroom. But eventually I sell them all.

#SellLeaseRentOrKill

Steven Lang

More by Steven Lang

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 31 comments

George B on Jan 20, 2011

Sell for a quick profit. The Saturn L series was canceled due to poor sales so junkyard parts are going to be difficult to get.

Like Reply
Alfred p. sloan on Jan 21, 2011

Puke on it and call it art, but what ever you do don't drive it.

Like Reply

Recent Comments

Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Thankfully I don't have to deal with GDI issues in my Frontier. These cleaners should do well for me if I win.
Theflyersfan Serious answer time...Honda used to stand for excellence in auto engineering. Their first main claim to fame was the CVCC (we don't need a catalytic converter!) engine and it sent from there. Their suspensions, their VTEC engines, slick manual transmissions, even a stowing minivan seat, all theirs. But I think they've been coasting a bit lately. Yes, the Civic Type-R has a powerful small engine, but the Honda of old would have found a way to get more revs out of it and make it feel like an i-VTEC engine of old instead of any old turbo engine that can be found in a multitude of performance small cars. Their 1.5L turbo-4...well...have they ever figured out the oil dilution problems? Very un-Honda-like. Paint issues that still linger. Cheaper feeling interior trim. All things that fly in the face of what Honda once was. The only thing that they seem to have kept have been the sales staff that treat you with utter contempt for daring to walk into their inner sanctum and wanting a deal on something that isn't a bare-bones CR-V. So Honda, beat the rest of your Japanese and Korean rivals, and plug-in hybridize everything. If you want a relatively (in an engineering way) easy way to get ahead of the curve, raise the CAFE score, and have a major point to advertise, and be able to sell to those who can't plug in easily, sell them on something that will get, for example, 35% better mileage, plug in when you get a chance, and drives like a Honda. Bring back some of the engineering skills that Honda once stood for. And then start introducing a portfolio of EVs once people are more comfortable with the idea of plugging in. People seeing that they can easily use an EV for their daily errands with the gas engine never starting will eventually sell them on a future EV because that range anxiety will be lessened. The all EV leap is still a bridge too far, especially as recent sales numbers have shown. Baby steps. That's how you win people over.
Theflyersfan If this saves (or delays) an expensive carbon brushing off of the valves down the road, I'll take a case. I understand that can be a very expensive bit of scheduled maintenance.
Zipper69 A Mini should have 2 doors and 4 cylinders and tires the size of dinner plates.All else is puffery.
Theflyersfan Just in time for the weekend!!! Usual suspects A: All EVs are evil golf carts, spewing nothing but virtue signaling about saving the earth, all the while hacking the limbs off of small kids in Africa, money losing pits of despair that no buyer would ever need and anyone that buys one is a raging moron with no brains and the automakers who make them want to go bankrupt.(Source: all of the comments on every EV article here posted over the years)Usual suspects B: All EVs are powered by unicorns and lollypops with no pollution, drive like dreams, all drivers don't mind stopping for hours on end, eating trays of fast food at every rest stop waiting for charges, save the world by using no gas and batteries are friendly to everyone, bugs included. Everyone should torch their ICE cars now and buy a Tesla or Bolt post haste.(Source: all of the comments on every EV article here posted over the years)Or those in the middle: Maybe one of these days, when the charging infrastructure is better, or there are more options that don't cost as much, one will be considered as part of a rational decision based on driving needs, purchasing costs environmental impact, total cost of ownership, and ease of charging.(Source: many on this site who don't jump on TTAC the split second an EV article appears and lives to trash everyone who is a fan of EVs.)