Brazil: VW And GM Squander Brand Equity

Marcelo de Vasconcellos
by Marcelo de Vasconcellos

Wolfsburg must be fuming. Among all the good news coming in from all corners of the earth, there’s a market that insists on being the proverbial thorn in their side. That’d be my little ole Brazil, which is, en passant, the world’s fourth largest. And it’s a market where Volkswagen has been nearly forever. Well-known Brazilian automotive journalist Fernando Calmon, writing for the just-auto website, reports a major shakeup in automotive brand values in Brazil (can you feel the ground shaking a little?). Mr. Calmon, citing the Brand Finance consultancy, reports that the most valuable car brand in Brazil is…

Fiat.

Yes those little Italian rascals have taken over from VW and GM. The study refers to 2009 and Fiat took first place among car makers by default. It retained the 10th place (among all brands present in the Brazilian market, not just cars), it earned in 2008. GM, however, which had ranked 8th in 2008, dropped to 13th in 2009. The big shocker though was perennial leader VeeDub. Its fall was even worse than Chevy’s. Just two years ago it was 4th. Last year it was just 12th. Brand equity of all car makers depreciated faster than a new car driving off the dealer’s lot. Only Fiat held its value.

Among the reasons for VW’s fall from grace is the trouble facing its mission critical Gol. Market leader for the past 23 years, it was totally re-skinned, re-engineered and re-launched last year. As a result, improved sales, the chance to overtake Fiat and again be on top, but then…disaster! 4 recalls in little more than a year really took its toll on the little car. Red card for the Gol. These troubles no doubt helped pave the way for Fiat’s mission critical Uno. The Gol is now in the fight of its life for first place. Among other cars in VW’s lineup, most are underperforming. Just the Fox is conquering sales. The recently launched Amarok may well be a flop. Mr. Calmon also notes that VW is having difficulties with its dealer network. Complaints and unhappy customers abound.

According to the Mr. Calmon’s report, GM’s woes are of a different nature. First off are worried Brazilian consumers concerned over headquarter’s bankruptcy and subsequent nationalization. That can take the luster off many a brand. Also cited are persistent complaints over perceived drop in quality. Call it a perception gap, but Brazilian consumers are calling it like they see it. When GM do Brasil’s products came from Opel, Brazilians were proud to drive the bowtie’s offerings. Now that they are all being substituted by a more easterly source of engineering, color Brazilians unimpressed. So negatively impressed that it has precipitated the General’s downfall. Chevy has announced measures to correct this though that remains to be seen. Not to mention to be felt by the Brazilian consumer.

The Brand Consultancy study rings true. It reflects what’s going on in our market. A unique, a little offbeat market that is, nonetheless, one of the world’s most important. Not only in terms of size, but also in potential for growth. Makers should be wary and judiciously study what’s going on here. An important part of their future is here. This market is slowly, but surely maturing. It is also becoming less and less tolerant of mistakes and blunders.

Marcelo de Vasconcellos
Marcelo de Vasconcellos

More by Marcelo de Vasconcellos

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 7 comments
  • Merc190 I would say Civic Si all the way if it still revved to 8300 rpm with no turbo. But nowadays I would pick the Corolla because I think they have a more clear idea on their respective models identity and mission. I also believe Toyota has a higher standard for quality.
  • Dave Holzman I think we're mixing up a few things here. I won't swear to it, but I'd be damned surprised if they were putting fire retardant in the seats of any cars from the '50s, or even the '60s. I can't quite conjure up the new car smell of the '57 Chevy my parents bought on October 17th of that year... but I could do so--vividly--until the last five years or so. I loved that scent, and when I smelled it, I could see the snow on Hollis Street in Cambridge Mass, as one or the other parent got ready to drive me to nursery school, and I could remember staring up at the sky on Christmas Eve, 1957, wondering if I might see Santa Claus flying overhead in his sleigh. No, I don't think the fire retardant on the foam in the seats of 21st (and maybe late 20th) century cars has anything to do with new car smell. (That doesn't mean new car small lacked toxicity--it probably had some.)
  • ToolGuy Is this a website or a podcast with homework? You want me to answer the QOTD before I listen to the podcast? Last time I worked on one of our vehicles (2010 RAV4 2.5L L4) was this past week -- replaced the right front passenger window regulator (only problem turned out to be two loose screws, but went ahead and installed the new part), replaced a bulb in the dash, finally ordered new upper dash finishers (non-OEM) because I cracked one of them ~2 years ago.Looked at the mileage (157K) and scratched my head and proactively ordered plugs, coils, PCV valve, air filter and a spare oil filter, plus a new oil filter housing (for the weirdo cartridge-type filter). Those might go in tomorrow. Is this interesting to you? It ain't that interesting to me. 😉The more intriguing part to me, is I have noticed some 'blowby' (but is it) when the oil filler cap is removed which I don't think was there before. But of course I'm old and forgetful. Is it worth doing a compression test? Leakdown test? Perhaps if a guy were already replacing the plugs...
  • Crown No surprise there. The toxic chemical stew of outgassing.
  • Spamvw Seeing the gear indicator made me wonder when PRNDL was mandated.Anyone?Anyone?1971
Next