Piston Slap: Going Commander, Losing Your Shirt

Sajeev Mehta
by Sajeev Mehta

Michal writes:

Normally I can find answers for my friends, however this one has me baffled and Google is no help, maybe Piston Slap can help.

My friend is selling/getting rid of a 2006 Jeep Commander, 4.7L, towing package and ~43k miles. Normally a fairly easy thing to price, however the thing has a buyback note on the title, because of some issue or another, he says it was something to do with a starter, but given that info was probably from a dealer, I take it with a huge grain of salt.

Using the normal ‘quoting’ sources (Edmunds/KBB/etc) a clean title car is in the 14k price range. However this has that buyback/lemon not on it, and I have not found any guidelines as to how to price it. (just advice as to how to avoid getting one) He was given a CarMax quote of 8k. But that’s not enough to cover the note. I told him to be honest & put it up on Craiglist & eBay to see what happens, anything over 8k is extra money in the pocket. But after doing some research that really didn’t pan out, I’m not so sure the 8k was a bad offer.

Sajeev Answers:

Though I believe CarMax has a place in our society, I don’t enjoy their modus operandi: low ball offers when there’s blood in the water. And I suspect that, if the owner is upside down on the note and the note in my inbox uses words like “dump,” “getting rid of” and “buyback.”

Then again, can’t blame CarMax for avoiding risky transactions, unless their offer came at gunpoint. I say this with a modicum of confidence thanks to my friendship with Mr. Steven Lang, my partner in crime with the “New or Used” series. I took a peek at the MMR values for comparable Jeep Commanders. And the actual auction prices in the lowest condition ranges from a high/med/low of $9700/8000/6225. Odds are a buyback vehicle, no matter what the condition, is gonna be a low-grade turd at auction. And don’t even think about selling this vehicle whenever gas prices spike.

So your advice to your friend is reasonable: put it on Craigslist, be honest, and sell it for more than 8 large. But what’s the wiser move?

Tough love, homie: pay off the damn thing, no matter how much they may hate it. Now’s the time to reduce debt, buy something else when Commanders are so old that a buyback concern fails to stand the test of time. Think fully depreciated, a la 1990s Ford Explorer: who’s gonna ask for a CarFax on a vehicle that’s only worth something when the government comes up with Cash for Clunkers incentives? This, even if your friend begs to differ, is the only win-win situation.

Send your queries to mehta@ttac.com

Sajeev Mehta
Sajeev Mehta

More by Sajeev Mehta

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 38 comments
  • John Horner John Horner on Aug 30, 2010

    Was the buy-back nature of this vehicle disclosed to the current owner when they bought it? A mark like that on the title undermines the value of the vehicle and, in most states at least, has to be disclosed to the buyer. Ah, I now read all the comments. I should do that before posting. The friend is lucky the dealer was willing to help sweep that problem back under the rug. Of course, said dealer is going to turn around and sell the Commanded at a $2k-$4k profit and once again will disclose the title problem at the very last moment!

  • Godflesh Godflesh on Aug 31, 2010

    Re: the question of how to determine potential value, my past two credit unions would issue loans for prior salvage branded vehicles for 80% of the unbranded vehicle. I dabble in prior salvage cars, it is always a fun ride. Never(ever ever!) pay good money for them, no one else will.

  • Tassos Good job, Senile, Corrupt Idiot-in-Chief.And when Inflation doubles again under your failed watch, LIE again that it was .. 9% when you took office, while THE REAL inflation then was less than 2%!Disgusting imbecile....
  • Wjtinfwb Glad to see Toyota hanging in there with sedans. It's a bit clunky looking but no worse than a new BMW 7-series at 1/3 the price. More power would be nice but Toyota is married to the Hybrid/4-cylinder configuration. As this package gets refined I expect it will be come the norm.
  • Wolfwagen The last couple of foreign vehicle manufacturers that tried breaking into the U.S. Mainstream Vehicle Market had a very hard time and 1. Couldn't get past the EPA regulation side (Mahindra) or 2. had a substandard product (Vinfast).
  • Midori Mayari I live in a South American country where that is already the case; Chinese brands essentially own the EV market here, and other companies seem unable to crack it even when they offer deep enough discounts that their offerings become cheaper than the Chinese ones (as Renault found when it discounted its cheapest EV to be about 15% cheaper than the BYD Seagull/Dolphin Mini and it still sold almost nothing).What's more, the arrival of the Chinese EVs seem to have turbocharged the EV transition; we went from less than 1% monthly EV market share to about 5% in the span of a year, and it's still growing. And if — as predicted — Chinese EV makers lower their production costs to be lower than those of regular ICE cars in the next few years, they could undercut equivalent ICE car prices with EVs and take most of the car market by storm. After all, a pretty sizeable number of car owners here have a garage where they could charge, and with local fuel and electricity prices charging at home reduces fuel costs by over 80% compared with an ICE car.
  • FreedMike So...Tesla does no marketing except to justify Elon Musk's pay. Mmmmmkay...
Next