Piston Slap: De-fusing The Fusion's TSB Dilemma

by Sajeev Mehta

Published: June 9th, 2010

piston slap de fusing the fusion s tsb dilemma

Jim writes:

I had a transmission problem with my Fusion. Dealer tells me lots and lots of people are having the problem, and parts are backordered. It appears 2010 Fusions being sold today have defective transmissions. Ford has a TSB on the issue to dealers. People claim transmission leaves them stranded on freeway. Search Fusion Transmission Problems on Google and you will see. I think someone in the media needs to do a story on this.

Sajeev Answers:

Kinda like farting in church, commentary on vehicle recalls (or TSBs) is tough scenario for automotive journalists. Not because of the parasitic relationship between journalists and manufacturers, since there’s never been a Shelby GT500 press car in my driveway. Ever. So what’s my problem?

Reporting on a TSB requires a journalist to stick their neck out, making less-than-educated guesses on the problem and its subsequent outcomes. Which means I could be wrong. Or misleading. I don’t have access to the facts: automatic transmissions have so many variables that it’s almost impossible to find the truth. And the truth often changes between vehicles because of road conditions, driving habits, and ongoing production changes during assembly. Which sucks, but nobody’s perfect: just ask owners of 2000-ish model Honda Accords (V6) and Toyota Camrys (V6, 6-speed auto) who faced the same challenges as their brothers/sisters in Fusions and Milans.

I’ll stop covering my ass now, and try to answer this concern: parts will always be backordered because today’s lean production strategies take forever to crank out a replacement part. Inventory is a dirty word, people. And the manufacturer can sometimes (always?) underestimate the scope of the problem, making the wait time even worse. Odds are a decent fix is in the works. And most owners will remain happy, because they will not keep their car longer than 100,000 miles. After that, who knows just how bad the current transmission problem shortens the unit’s lifespan. And when the odometer travels that far, these TSBs will be but a distant memory everywhere: including the Internet.

Send your queries to mehta@ttac.com

#Advice #Ford #Fusion #PistonaSlap #Transmission

Sajeev Mehta

More by Sajeev Mehta

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 42 comments

Mountainman on Jun 09, 2010

I had an 06 Fusion 4cyl 5-spd that I got with 6,000 miles. Clutch burned out at 30,000. I figured it was beaten on, so I replaced it. Then, the clutch went out again at 48,000. My wife and I both drove manuals all our life, so we knew it wasn't us. Fought with Ford over this, to no avail. Got the clutch fixed again, drove it off the lot right to a Subaru dealer. Our Impreza is riding nicely now. Last American car I will ever own.

Like Reply
Ajla on Jun 09, 2010
Just underpowered, and since the Charger is a much less powerful car than the Camaro SS, it didn’t develop the same problems. I don't think it is a power issue. The Challenger SRT8 makes similar power to the Camaro SS. Plus, IIRC, the CTS-V and GT500 use the TR6060 and both those cars make more power than the SS. ___ My pulled out of the air guess is that the Camaro line just got a bad order of transmissions.

Like Reply

Recent Comments

Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh A prelude is a bad idea. There is already Acura with all the weird sport trims. This will not make back it's R&D money.
Analoggrotto I don't see a red car here, how blazing stupid are you people?
Redapple2 Love the wheels
Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.