By on November 22, 2009

Giftig.

Despite already having some of the highest incentives in the game right now, Chrysler is joining GM in putting more cash on the hood to clear out year-end inventory. Automotive News [sub] reports that Chrysler will be adding $1,000 to $1,500 in incentives per vehicle, on top of October’s $3,219 per vehicle average (as calculated by Edmunds). According to the same Edmunds analysis, the average industry incentive is $2,468 per vehicle. This continued reliance on incentives contradicts a number of Sergio Marchionne’s statements at the presentation of Chrysler’s five year product and business plan, in which he argued that Chrysler could not rely on incentives to push volume. Marchionne claims to believe the incentive-based volume chasing is “insane,” but his commitment to a sustainable business plan is about to be tested. For Chrysler’s five year plan to succeed, its sales need to turn around fast, making 2009 the trough year indicated on this graph. But with no new product (and by new product, we mean refreshed product) due out until the fourth quarter of next year, such a turnaround seems impossible without huge incentives. And yet Chrysler also showed graphs projecting a direct relationship between volume and profit, meaning there is little to no wiggle room for profit-sapping incentives. Rock, hard place, I’d like you to meet Chrysler Group.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

9 Comments on “Chrysler Bumps Incentives. Again. Still....”


  • avatar

    I can’t speak for the whole country, but here: in NYC, the most expensive city in America, I see lots of new Chryslers and Dodge’s on the road. Every single day.

  • avatar
    segfault

    I’d be interested in a Sebring if they had a $10,000 incentive on them.

  • avatar
    stuki

                The whole MSRP and incentives charade when it comes to auto pricing is silly. Cars are bought to be used a given number of years, and the only cost that matters are the total cost of ownership over those years. To set MSRP, auto makers should consult ALG or something for estimated absolute residual, and offer to sell at X% depreciation over i years and j miles. Anything else is simply futzing around with ultimately meaningless numbers.
     
                But I guess they feel whatever it is they’re doing, works better than the alternatives. To me, it simply looks like continued attempts at suckering suckers, which I believe will ultimately prove to be a losing business.

  • avatar
    raast

    Residual (read trade-in or sale) value gets affected by this.
    It’s great if you buy and drive into the ground, but for those that do not…

  • avatar
    Boff

    I’m not sure I see a contradiction with Sergio’s 5-year plan…who doesn’t jack up incentives to clear out inventory? This inventory would largely have been put in place pre-FIAT anyways.

    We won’t truy know if Chrysler has kicked its addiction to incentives for some years…

  • avatar

    The problem with Chrysler (and GM) is that they have relied on these crazy incentives for so long that even their most loyal customers will not buy without them. Everyone knows that if you wait a month or two you can catch the next end of the month, red tag, fire sale event.

    • 0 avatar
      superbadd75

      Exactly. And don’t even mention employee pricing and 0% financing. Everyone in the industry kind of screwed the pooch after 9/11 by throwing out crazy incentives to reboot the market. It hasn’t been the same since then. Even Honda began offering cash incentives after that, when the most they had ever done before was special finance rates.


Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Subscribe without commenting

Recent Comments

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Staff

  • Contributing Writers

  • Jack Baruth, United States
  • Brendan McAleer, Canada
  • Marcelo De Vasconcellos, Brazil
  • Vojta Dobes, Czech Republic
  • Matthias Gasnier, Australia
  • W. Christian 'Mental' Ward, Abu Dhabi
  • Mark Stevenson, Canada
  • Cameron Aubernon, United States
  • J Emerson, United States