GM "Postpones" Decision on Selling Opel to the Russians

Robert Farago
by Robert Farago

In other words, it ain’t gonna happen. If GM was going to sell Opel to the Canadian-fronted Russian consortium, they would have done it. Remember, the German elections are coming. The sale would have pleased the Russians, Germans and Canadians, but since they aren’t going to do it before September 27, it’s a clear indication that GM’s either going to sell Opel to Belgian-based private equity boys RHJ International or . . . raise some cash, pay off the Germans’ €1.5 billion “bridge loan,” put some more money in the brand’s empty coffers and keep Opel as the US outpost of a nationalized American automaker that provides a host of unloved automobile platforms to moribund GM badge engineers. Automotive News [sub] doesn’t quite make that analysis, but it’s close enough for government work. At least they see the downside . . .

Sources familiar with the negotiations have said that GM is considering raising $4 billion to keep control of Opel.

GM could contribute more than 1 billion euros of its own money to retain Opel, while governments in the U.K., Spain and Poland that are home to major manufacturing operations would finance another 1 billion.

GM could also raise money by selling or mortgaging the automaker’s assets in China, one source said. GM is no longer barred from using funding from the U.S. government to support its international operations, but taking this route could trigger a domestic political storm in the United States.

Ya think? Not to mention how Chancellor Merkel will feel if/when she’s reelected after GM failed to help her out by flogging Opel to the Ruskies. Could Merkel call the loan and throw Opel into bankruptcy, so that the Russians could pick up Opel for pennies on the dollar? She could. One way or another, payback’s a bitch.

Robert Farago
Robert Farago

More by Robert Farago

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 9 comments
  • PeteMoran PeteMoran on Sep 08, 2009

    The real reason GM is fighting all the way? All the valuable small car tech is vested within Opel, and anyone who grabs Opel will be an immediate small car competitor for GM in every market.

  • Npbheights Npbheights on Sep 08, 2009

    GM should have gotten serious about selling Opals in the US instead of blowing billions creating Saturn. They might have gotten a lot of people into a GM product without them really knowing it. It could have been marketed as an upsacale European import like an Audi or BMW, and it might have caught on a little better w/o all of the investment that Saturn took, although it would have taken a separate sales channel like Saturn, not an afterthought at a Buick dealership like in the '70's Would have negated any reason to buy SAAB too.

  • AZFelix What could possibly go wrong with putting your life in the robotic hands of precision crafted and expertly programmed machinery?
  • Orange260z I'm facing the "tire aging out" issue as well - the Conti ECS on my 911 have 2017 date codes but have lots (likely >70%) tread remaining. The tires have spent quite little time in the sun, as the car has become a garage queen and has likely had ~10K kms put on in the last 5 years. I did notice that they were getting harder last year, as the car pushes more in corners and the back end breaks loose under heavy acceleration. I'll have to do a careful inspection for cracks when I get the car out for the summer in the coming weeks.
  • VoGhost Interesting comments. Back in reality, AV is already here, and the experience to date has been that AV is far safer than most drivers. But I guess your "news" didn't tell you that, for some reason.
  • Doc423 Come try to take it, Pal. Environmental Whacko.
  • 28-Cars-Later Mazda despite attractive styling has resale issues - 'Yota is always the answer.
Next