Ask the Best and Brightest: What's Up With Hybrids, Anyway?

Robert Farago
by Robert Farago

MB Chris posits the following:

A straight EV at this point isn’t very useful to many people because of the current technology’s limitations. And, for me, hybrids are far too expensive and complicated to consider buying. I’m an ASE certified mechanic (25 years) and work in automotive manufacturing (nobody very important). The big thing that I can’t figure out about hybrids is why have a conventional drivetrain at all? Why not have the car operate similar to a diesel electric locomotive? Drive a large alternator with a combustion engine designed to run most efficiently at [a certain] RPM. Have no idle at all. It’s either on driving the alternator or not running. NVH engineering would only be needed to cope with that one RPM and startup/stop. Put an electric motor to drive each rear wheel. Mount them inboard so unsprung weight will not be increased. Even 4 electric motors or one on each axle if you want AWD. No transmission, driveshaft or differential is needed. That would come close to offsetting the weight of the battery pack.

IC engines are controlled by wire so why not just control the output of electric motors? Seems to me that an engine designed to run most efficiently at one RPM would be far more fuel efficient than the current crop of hybrids. Some redundancy is automatically built in. If one electric motor quits you can still move with the remaining motor to a place of repair. If your IC engine quits you can still move a small distance to a repair center or safe place (depending on the battery state of charge). Same with the alternator failure. Making a system like this and able to be a plug in would be even better. This type system would work for daily commute as well as long trips. Finally, this system should be less expensive without the transmission and differential. Those parts would offset part of the cost of the battery pack. What do you think?

Robert Farago
Robert Farago

More by Robert Farago

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 78 comments
  • MBChris MBChris on Sep 30, 2009

    http://wardsauto.com/ar/gm_fuel_cell_090924/ Well this is the best news I've seen so far on the quest toward fuel cells. Porschespeed, if the current crop of hybrids is the cheapest and the best they can come up with so far, I'll pass. Takes too long to pay back the upfront costs of the hybrid system in fuel savings. Consider me politically incorrect in that I'm interested in the cheapest mode of transporation and not the greenest.

  • PeteMoran PeteMoran on Oct 01, 2009

    @ MBChris, Current hybrids are really nothing more than expensive experiments trying to get a market going in the direction of electric vehicles. Consider me politically incorrect in that I’m interested in the cheapest mode of transporation and not the greenest. These two statements tell me that you asked a question and then were only satisfied with an answer that fit your preconceptions. Well done.

  • Wjtinfwb Ford can produce all the training and instructional videos they want, and issue whatever mandates they can pursuant to state Franchise laws. The dealer principal and staff are the tip of the spear and if they don't give a damn, the training is a waste of time. Where legal, link CSI and feedback scores to allocations and financial incentives (or penalties). I'm very happy with my Ford products (3 at current) as I was with my Jeeps. But the dealer experience is as maddening and off-putting as possible. I refuse now to spend my money at a retailer who treats me and my investment like trash so I now shop for a dealer who does provide professional and courteous service. That led to the Jeep giving way to an Acura, which has not been trouble free but the dealer is at least courteous and responsive. It's the same owner group as the local Ford dealer so it's not the owners DNA, it's how American Honda manages the dealer interface with American Honda's customer. Ford would do well to adopt the same posture. It's their big, blue oval sign that's out front.
  • ToolGuy Nice car."I’m still on the fill-up from prior to Christmas 2023."• This is how you save the planet (and teach the oil companies a lesson) with an ICE.
  • Scrotie about 4 years ago there was a 1992 oldsmobile toronado which was a travtech-avis pilot car that had the prototype nav system and had a big antenna on the back. it sold quick and id never seen another ever again. i think they wanted like 13500 for it which was steep for an early 90s gm car.
  • SunnyGL I helped my friend buy one of these when they came in 2013 (I think). We tried a BMW 535xi, an Audi A6 and then this. He was very swayed by the GS350 and it helped a lot that Lexus knocked about $8k off the MSRP. I guess they wanted to get some out there. He has about 90k on it now and it's been very reliable, but some chump rear-ended it hard when it was only a few years old.From memory, liked the way the Bimmer drove and couldn't fathom why everyone thought Audi interiors were so great at that time - the tester we had was a sea of black.The GS350's mpg is impressive, much better than the '05 G35x I had which could only get about 24mpg highway.
  • Theflyersfan Keep the car. It's reliable, hasn't nickeled and dimed you to death, and it looks like you're a homeowner so something with a back seat and a trunk is really helpful! As I've discovered becoming a homeowner with a car with no back seat and a trunk the size of a large cooler, even simple Target or Ikea runs get complicated if you don't ride up with a friend with a larger car. And I wonder if the old VW has now been left in Price Hill with the keys in the ignition and a "Please take me" sign taped to the windshield? The problems it had weren't going to improve with time.
Next