Review: Toyota Supra Single Turbo

Jack Baruth
by Jack Baruth

Forget Kowalski’s white Challenger, forget Steve McQueen’s Porsche 917K, forget Burt Reynolds’ Trans Am. There’s one movie car that really matters to the twentysomething car enthusiast, and I’m driving a nearly perfect example at full boost up a winding road. After less than ten minutes, my passenger is tired of me rapid-firing quotes at her: “I owe you a ten-second car.” “This will dominate all.” “There’s all kinds of family, Brian, and that’s a choice you’re going to have to make.” Each time I floor the accelerator, there’s almost enough time to spit out another one of Dominic Toretto’s outstanding phrases (“I’M IN YOUR FACE!”) before the boost spools. When it does . . . watch out.

The Toyota Supra started life as a long-nose variant of the four-cylinder Celica, but by the fourth and final generation it had become a platform relative to Toyota’s rear-wheel-drive home-market midsizers and the Lexus SC. The “MkIV” Supra arrived in the United States just in time for the collapse of the Japanese performance market, and although it was probably a better car than the competing RX-7 and 300ZX Twin Turbo, it never sold in significant numbers. A ten-thousand-dollar price cut in the final year of North American sales did virtually nothing to revive the car’s fortunes, so the big Supra became a home-market delicacy for its final four years.

As fate would have it, the Supra was discontinued in this country just before the swelling import performance scene made it a hot commodity. Buyers lucky enough to purchase lightly-used examples before the “Supra craze” hit were often able to put over a hundred thousand miles on them and resell the cars at a profit. An entire community developed around the car, with modified versions reaching the fabled thousand-horsepower mark. The selection of a Supra as the “hero car” of The Fast and the Furious simply put the icing on the cake.

Simply showing up at any street-racer gathering in a modified Supra is enough to guarantee superstar status, but as I boot the big Toyota up the side of Bear Mountain, the sixty-seven-millimeter single turbo whistling like a tornado heard from a distance, there’s nobody to admire us but the occasional terrified squirrel. PRI, the owners of this particular example, claim six hundred and fifty horsepower at the crank, and the swelling rush with which the black Supra flings itself down each straight lends credence to the claim.

Even with Tein dampers and TRD swaybars, it rides fairly well, with some big, lolling body motions on corner entry and a little squiggle as the boost hits on exit. I’m breaking my personal rule and using heavy left-foot braking to keep the boost up. It’s an old trick, attributed to Mark Donohue, but it keeps the turbo spinning in the midcorner. Unfortunately, it puts heat in the aftermarket brakes, which are already soggy from the effort of hauling this big wagon down from the kind of straight-line speed it’s possible to accomplish with twice the stock level of power. Fortunately, before the pedal can sink all the way to the floor we’re off Bear Mountain and onto some nice straight freeways.

Supras are drawn to freeway racing as swallows are drawn to Capistrano, but we don’t have any of the natural predators or prey which inhabit that universe. No Hayabusas, no Z06 Corvettes, no Procharged Trans Ams, no silver-and-blue R34 Skylines. So I rolled up next to a grey Camry, beeped my horn three times, then left the elderly driver of said fellow Toyota utterly confused as I blasted away to triple digits. At go-to-jail speeds, the Supra is eerily composed, and there’s a hilarious contrast between the utterly prosaic Corolla-esque interior and the Millennium Falcon warp of the oncoming road.

Oh, that interior. Toyota’s crusade to make every car they sell miserable inside did not stop at the gates of Supra City, you see. PRI’s done their best to rehab the Supra’s cockpit, installing new carpet and upgraded seats, but the crappy plastics and uninspired design are pure 1990s Toyota. Sit in this car and then climb into the sexy, inviting interior of a 1993 RX-7, and you’ll understand why dealers had trouble moving the metal. It just doesn’t feel very special.

And that, in the end, is the fundamental problem with the Supra. It’s a big, bland car that just happens to go very fast. PRI’s variant goes faster—much faster—so if you’re looking that that ten-second Supra experience, this is the way to get it. From the big intercooler to the monster rear wing, PRI’s Supra is Fast and Furious. If you’re a fan of that genre, this is a car not to be missed. If you aren’t, but still want that Millennium Falcon hyperspace experience, I suggest a snake on a plain. If you get my drift.

[ Performance Rental International provided the vehicle reviewed, insurance and a tank of gas.]

Jack Baruth
Jack Baruth

More by Jack Baruth

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 39 comments
  • Dolorean23 Dolorean23 on Jul 14, 2009
    I drove the top three Japanese sports coupe of that day — Toyota Supra Turbo, Nissan 300Z and Mitsubishi 3000 VR4. The Toyota struck me as a capable car, but without a spirit or soul. The Mits was OK, but the 4WD made it too heavy with too much technology. The Nissan was the best of the lot. I just wished Nissan sold the 2+2 Turbo in the US as they did in other markets. Amen brother. However, my '86 300ZX 2+2 wasn't a turbo but according to the manual and the Nissan dealership, one could've have purchased the 3.0L single turbo. In fact, when my engine blew up at 285K, I was quoted $3500 to replace it with a turbo V6. Question then. Are cars only cool (from a Movie perspective) from the Baby boomer era fast forwarding to Gen Y? Skipping an entire generation in between? The only examples I could think of was John Candy's turbo charged LeBaron Convertible in P,T,and A and Michael Douglas' Mustang GT Convertible in Basic Instinct.
  • Mr. Gray Mr. Gray on Nov 16, 2009

    Oh, the beautiful Supra... it's a reminder that Toyota now only appeals to church-going soccer moms and their gay boyfriends. Remember also the AE86, the Celica, and the MR2? Toyota, you used to be cool. What happened? Okay, I know what happened, but it's still depressing...

  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh A prelude is a bad idea. There is already Acura with all the weird sport trims. This will not make back it's R&D money.
  • Analoggrotto I don't see a red car here, how blazing stupid are you people?
  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
Next