Piston Slap: Who Will Iridium Me of This Troublesome Spark Plug?

Sajeev Mehta
by Sajeev Mehta

TTAC Commentator don1967 writes,

What’s the deal with these platinum/iridium-tipped spark plugs? Is there any reason to go through the (sometimes very high) cost of dismantling half of your engine to replace them every 100,000 miles if the car is running fine? Also, what do you think about periodically loosening and retightening them to prevent seizing . . . does that ever actually happen?

Sajeev replies:

For your first question, I smell a Seinfeld reference coming on. But I won’t go there. Instead, know that platinum plugs usually go 100k miles, which combined with metal timing chains, made for great marketing propaganda (circa 1996) when Detroit wanted to trump those pesky CamCords that needed new plugs and timing belts well before the magic 100-grand mark. Great idea, but it didn’t work.

And here’s what little I know about Iridium plugs: they give stronger spark during leaner air/fuel ratios and generally respond well to serious engine modifications. They don’t last as long as platinum plugs, so I don’t recommend them to your average motorist.

Don, when it comes to changing plugs, I am a big fan of RTFM. Not because I take twisted pleasure in ripping off intake manifolds (and wiper motor assemblies, vacuum lines, sensors, etc) to reach the back plugs on a transverse-oriented V6, but because old spark plugs can’t perform like new. I’ve changed several (neglected) cars with platinum plugs with over 100k and they felt faster, idled smoother, and got 1-2mpg better economy. And if I really cared to find out, I suspect the re-tuned motors spit out far less emissions for Mother Nature to deal with.

Last question: I’ve never considered this loosey-tightey regiment you mention. I use a dab of anti-seize on the plug’s threads before installation. Removal (when the engine is cold) is no problem afterward.

Bonus! A Piston Slap Nugget of Wisdom:

What’s true for grocery shopping also applies to cars. If (like me) you perform tune-ups in your own garage, take note: don’t buy the little ketchup packets of anti-seize at the parts counter. Instead of spending $1.00 on almost nothing, get a bottle of the real thing for an extra $6. And be set for life. How great is that?

Sajeev Mehta
Sajeev Mehta

More by Sajeev Mehta

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 23 comments
  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Off-road fluff on vehicles that should not be off road needs to die.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Saw this posted on social media; “Just bought a 2023 Tundra with the 14" screen. Let my son borrow it for the afternoon, he connected his phone to listen to his iTunes.The next day my insurance company raised my rates and added my son to my policy. The email said that a private company showed that my son drove the vehicle. He already had his own vehicle that he was insuring.My insurance company demanded he give all his insurance info and some private info for proof. He declined for privacy reasons and my insurance cancelled my policy.These new vehicles with their tech are on condition that we give up our privacy to enter their world. It's not worth it people.”
Next