By on June 20, 2009

On Friday evening, a wild rumor whirred via the wires. It started at Germany’s usually well informed Manager Magazin, then spread to Reuters and Bloomberg: Daimler may be taking a stake in its Stuttgart neighbor, Porsche. Through Porsche, Daimler would own a part of Volkswagen.

According to Manager Magazin, Daimler’s Zetsche and Porsche’s Wiedeking have had negotiations since May. Not surprising as in May it had become very apparent that Porsche was unable to finalize the Volkswagen takeover. In May, Ferdinand Piech, part owner of Porsche and Chairman of Volkswagen, made loud noises about VW taking over Porsche instead and sending Wiedeking to Siberia. Or more warmer places. Like Hell. The matter turned into a billion Euro soap opera. Wiedeking talked to anybody who may have money, the Sheikh of Qatar, and why not Daimler, they live next door.

This Friday was a special day for Porsche. They announced their ten-month report of their 2008/2009 fiscal. Cars down, derivatives up. On Friday, 640K call options on the VW stock came due, along with 638K put options. Porsche is rumored to be behind most of the unusually high volume. It could be a highly risky short straddle engineered by Porsche CFO Härter, Manager Magazin thinks that the puts could also be insurance bought by the banks who sold the calls to Porsche. Porsche doesn’t have the money to exercise the calls. If the calls expire, the banks (market makers in Germany) could sell the underlying VW shares, shares drop, a big no good for the 51 percent owner, Porsche. Porsche is NSFWd. Manager Magazin thinks the banks gave Porsche a stay of execution—so to speak—and told Porsche to come up with the money elsewhere. The banks have Porsche by the short and curlies. A little payback for last year’s short squeeze, that cost banks and funds billions, and claimed at least one life.

Enter Daimler. Daimler could take the derivatives off Porsche’s hands, exercise them, and voila, own 25 percent of Volkswagen. Daimler could also buy a chunk of Porsche shares outright. Manager Magazin says Wiedeking asked the Porsche/Piech families last week for permission to sell Porsche shares to external investors. The families said no, but will re-visit the matter next week.

Daimler recently got money from Qatar’s neighbor Abu Dhabi. A 9.1 percent stake was sold to Abu Dhabi’s state-controlled International Petroleum Investment Company (IPIC) for almost €2 billion ($2.78 bn). That puts a €22 billion valuation on Daimler. Car companies come cheap these days.

In the denial dept., Reuters reports that “a spokesman for Daimler called the report ‘pure speculation’ and a Porsche spokesman said he had no knowledge of talks with Daimler. A Volkswagen spokesman did not want to comment on the report.”

“We absolutely don’t comment on speculation,” Hartmut Schick, a Daimler executive, told Bloomberg. Schick would neither confirm nor deny the report.

At least Daimler got it right. Pure speculation it has always been. Daimler is not doing so well either. Benzes are a tough sell. S&P just downgraded Daimler from A to BBB+.

Anyway, “an industry source told Reuters that the report should be taken seriously.” Didn’t someone say that the industry has to consolidate? Sell Opel to Russia (or if all fails, to China), create a Volksporschedaimler (owned by Austrians and Saudis), and if BMW doesn’t come on board, NSFW ’em. Sounds boring and benign compared to what else is happening in the car world. Anyway, Porsche and Daimler go a long ways back. About 100 years.

Austro Daimler revisited? Picture courtesy flickr.com.

8 Comments on “Wild Ass Rumor of the Day, or Not: Daimler to Buy Porsche to Buy VW...”


  • avatar
    Gunnar

    Naah, Daimler can’t be that foolish. After all, they only just got rid of Chrysler, their worst mistake ever!

  • avatar
    Lee

    Ah Daimler, always on the look out for an auto company to suck the life out of.

  • avatar
    jpcavanaugh

    They could re-badge the Sprinter as a new VW bus!

  • avatar
    tom

    AFAIK, the VW Crafter is already a rebadged Sprinter…

  • avatar
    stuki

    Now where would that leave the Panamera and the Phaeton?

  • avatar
    John Horner

    How about this for a new law: Outlaw all of these crazy derivatives. If you want to invest in a company, but the stock. If you want to short a company, short the stock.

    Trading stock options isn’t investing, it’s gambling! An awful lot of people do not know the difference between investing and gambling.

    Furthermore, industrial companies should not be empowered to gamble with the shareholder’s money and the employees livelihoods.

  • avatar
    stuki

    John Horner,

    Currency hedges are derivatives as well. They’re almost a requirement for industrial companies in our long, international supply line world.

    And stock options as compensation are almost a necessity for cash starved startups.

    Employees can, if they really care that much, refuse to work for any company that trades in options.

  • avatar
    TonyJZX

    what happened to that wild BMW/Daimler tie up?

    since they had so many ‘synergies’ – both heavy in RWD platforms… BMW were even interested in getting into commercial vehicles


Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

You can also login using Facebook Connect. Connect with Facebook

Subscribe without commenting

Recent Comments

  • Re: Chevrolet Cruze Station Wagon Revealed

    redav - turbobrick, I think you’ve nailed it. If car companies were given an incentive to sell hatches/wagons instead of CUVs, and customers were given more...
  • Re: Chevrolet Cruze Station Wagon Revealed

    redav - JCraig, apparently 1 in 20 is sufficiently high rate for Ford to sell a Ti Focus with a manual, and nearly all of those are going to be custom ordered. They...
  • Re: Review: 2012 Jeep Wrangler Rubicon

    Alex L. Dykes - If you like the half doors, they are still an option, plastic zipper windows and all. I’ll take automatic climate control in my next Wrangler...
  • Re: Honda Civic Continues Its Unstoppable Death March Towards Canadian Sales Dominance

    wsn - A 10 year old Honda Civic may have its problems, but a 10 year old Chevy Cavalier would have even more problems (if...
  • Re: Review: 2012 Jeep Wrangler Rubicon

    threeer - I’m still having issues accepting a Wrangler with power windows and such…gimme two doors (that have the half-door and zip out windows) and call it...
  • Re: U.S. Car Plants Redline

    Pch101 - “even with modern lean production systems it’s important to have good people on the line.” Not really. The people need to be average, but not stellar. If a...
  • Re: U.S. Car Plants Redline

    gslippy - Mikey is right. Just look up Deming’s “red bead experiment”. A well-engineered car requires very little hand-fitting or craftsmanship. Your cell phone...
  • Re: Review: 2011 Ford F-350 Super Duty

    patman - So, would it be wrong to rent one of these trucks and return it with a SOHC 4.6L underhood in place of the Boss? I hope Ford does let this motor shine a bit....
  • Re: Review: 2011 Ford F-350 Super Duty

    Duncan - TTAC gave us a review of a car carrier transport ship – a rental truck review doesn’t seem like such a stretch. I like Sajeev’s enthusiasm for...
  • Re: House Science Committee Approves Bill Blocking E15

    redav - Number6, I understand why the EPA has its nose in energy policy. I am more bothered by corn growers dictating energy policy and lobbying to get...

 



Auto Insurance GPS Navigation
Car Loans Auto Parts
Car Warranty Wheels
Automotive Tires Car Care

Staff