Ask the Best and Brightest: International House Of Penske Lineup?

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

Roger Penske has got to be a busy guy these days. His purchase of Saturn is a characteristically audacious move that is simultaneously compelling and terrifying. Penske’s Saturn dealers will sell current GM products until they reach the end of their lifetimes. “Concurrent with that, we’ll go around the world to see what products could be brought into this country,” Penske tells Edmunds Inside Line. The “World Market” approach seems to do away with much of the industry’s basic understanding of branding, but Penske insists that aerodynamics, fuel efficiency, safety and styling will continue to be the defining characteristics for new Saturn products.

“We’ll be focused and targeted on models that serve the existing Saturn customer base and in the price ranges that already have surfaced with the existing owner base,” says the Midas of motorsport. Performance vehicles, it seems, are off the radar. “We need to be focused on the core volume before we become a specialty house. We need to generate volume,” says Penske. And though Renault/Samsung products are tipped as likely initial candidates for the International House Of Penske, let’s not assume any foregone conclusions for the sake of this exercise. Just give us your lineup of international vehicles (must be from brands with no US presence) for the new Saturn. Check out the gallery below for a few random suggestions.






Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 39 comments
  • MadHungarian MadHungarian on Jun 10, 2009

    There actually is a model for this kind of branding that has worked very well for decades. It's called Kenmore and Craftsman. Don't laugh. Obviously, Sears doesn't make washers, refrigerators, vacuums, lawn mowers and so on. They select menufacturers to source the product from, and often make some modifications to the appearance or controls, or add or subtract a feature or two, besides just swapping nameplates. And for all of Sears' overall ups and downs, they have done a damn good job of maintaining the Kenmore and Craftsman brand equity. This could be very interesting to see play out, as Penske/Saturn could give us access to many cars whose manufacturers would not be able or willing to make the investment to set up a North American dealer network. Of course, Penske will need to be able to provide the parts and warranty support. The first time a customer in Montana has to park his Dacia truck for a month waiting for some part to arrive from Bucharest, it's game over. I am also curious if Penske's long term plans include some manufacturing. What if he bought a plant -- plenty of 'em around -- and used it to bring back some of the cars that are most sorely missed? For example, buy the tooling for, oh, say, a Roadmaster wagon, update it a bit, and buy the engines and transmissions from GM (umm, excuse me, Governmentski Motors, or VEB Automobilwerk GM, or whatever it will be called now).

  • Menno Menno on Jun 11, 2009

    I sat down last evening with this in mind, so bear with me. Object one: be realistic (in other words, choose cars which can be sold in the US in a realistic timeframe considering how long it really will take to "federalize" them). Object two: make the car line up something which would appeal to the current Saturn buyer (obviously, don't alienate the people still willing to shop the brand) Object three: plan ahead with the realization that better MPG is demanded of future cars, whether by government fiat (sorry for the pun) or from market forces, it's going to happen; likewise, electric cars I even chose "names" which I thought sounded pretty cool. Feel free to choose your own names. Potential Saturn 2010 cars as of Oct. 2009 (and contract mfr.) Valor (New) sedan (Suzuki SX4, FWD), 2.0/4 (J) Aura sedan (new GM), 2.4/4, 3.6/V6 (US) Vue SUV (new GM), 2.4/4, 3.5/V6 (Mex) Outlook SUV (new GM), 3.6/V6 (US) Potential Saturn 2010 cars as of spring 2010 (and contract mfr.) Valor sedan (Suzuki SX4), 2.0/4 (J) Villa (New) sedan (Mitsubishi Galant), 2.4/4, 3.8/V6 (US) (in other words, replace the Aura as soon as GM refuses to build them) Vue SUV (new GM), 2.4/4, 3.5/V6 (M) Victor (New) SUV (Suzuki XL-7 based) 3.6/V6 (Canada) Potential Saturn 2011 cars (and contract mfr) Via (New) hatch (Dacia/Renault Sandro), 1.6 (BR) Valor sedan (Suzuki SX$), 2.04 (J) Vulcan (New) sedan (Renault-Samsung SM5), 2.0 (ROK) Villa sedan (Mitsubishi Galant), 3,8/V6 (US) Vista (New) SUV (Renault-Samsung QM5), 2.0/4 (ROK) Victor SUV (Suzuki XL-7 based), 3.6/V6 (Can) EV-2 (New) sedan (Renault), electric (F) Potential Saturn 2012 cars (and contract mfr) *possibly assembled in the US from kits? Via hatch (Dacia/Renault Sandro), 1.6 (BR) Valor (NEW) sedan (Renault-Samsung SM3)1.6/4 (ROK) Vulcan sedan (Renault-Samsung SM5) 2.0/4 (ROK)* Vista SUV (Renault-Samsung QM5) 2.0/4 (ROK)* Vanguard (new) sedan (Renault-Samsung SM7) 3.5/V6 (ROK) EV-2 sedan (Renault) Electric (Mexico?) Obviously, a tie-in on the main D-class (Camcord) sized Vulcan line would be to get with Paramount and hire in the new young Spock to do ads.... Don't forget that Dacia, Renault and Nissan are all tied together; that already certified Nissan engines could be used in any vehicles in which they would fit and could be engineered to go into; that Renault-Samsung are thought to be the top quality manufacturer by the South Koreans, apparently; and that there is a free-trade auto pact between South Korea and the US (or at least there was meant to be one). Also don't forget that Renault is preeminent in electric car development, crash safety and have come a long long way since the days of the "Renault Appliance" sold by AMC dealers. Wonder if any old AMC executives, seeing Renault's success in the rest of the world, are sorry they sold out to Crapster in 1987?

  • Jeff Overall I prefer the 59 GM cars to the 58s because of less chrome but I have a new appreciation of the 58 Cadillac Eldorados after reading this series. I use to not like the 58 Eldorados but I now don't mind them. Overall I prefer the 55-57s GMs over most of the 58-60s GMs. For the most part I like the 61 GMs. Chryslers I like the 57 and 58s. Fords I liked the 55 thru 57s but the 58s and 59s not as much with the exception of Mercury which I for the most part like all those. As the 60s progressed the tail fins started to go away and the amount of chrome was reduced. More understated.
  • Theflyersfan Nissan could have the best auto lineup of any carmaker (they don't), but until they improve one major issue, the best cars out there won't matter. That is the dealership experience. Year after year in multiple customer service surveys from groups like JD Power and CR, Nissan frequency scrapes the bottom. Personally, I really like the never seen new Z, but after having several truly awful Nissan dealer experiences, my shadow will never darken a Nissan showroom. I'm painting with broad strokes here, but maybe it is so ingrained in their culture to try to take advantage of people who might not be savvy enough in the buying experience that they by default treat everyone like idiots and saps. All of this has to be frustrating to Nissan HQ as they are improving their lineup but their dealers drag them down.
  • SPPPP I am actually a pretty big Alfa fan ... and that is why I hate this car.
  • SCE to AUX They're spending billions on this venture, so I hope so.Investing during a lull in the EV market seems like a smart move - "buy low, sell high" and all that.Key for Honda will be achieving high efficiency in its EVs, something not everybody can do.
  • ChristianWimmer It might be overpriced for most, but probably not for the affluent city-dwellers who these are targeted at - we have tons of them in Munich where I live so I “get it”. I just think these look so terribly cheap and weird from a design POV.
Next