Daimler Pays $2.3 Billion to Jettison 19.9% of Chrysler

Robert Farago
by Robert Farago

When the historians chronicle Detroit’s decline and fall, Daimler’s rape and pillage of the storied American car brand will merit an entire tome. In short form, the Germans came, they saw, they laughed, they lunched, they left. And when they left, they maintained a 19.9 percent share in the hollowed-out American automaker. Wishful thinking? Tax law? A codicil from Cerberus to allow Chrysler’s new masters to sue the shit out of the Germans if things went badly? In any case, thanks to The Presidential Task Force on Automobiles determination to reconstitute Chrysler as a worker’s co-op, by Friday, Daimler gets to see Chrysler implode from afar. [NB: So much for the “The Big 2.8”.] Bloomberg reports that Daimler will “cede” its remaining its stake in “former U.S. division” (ouch) to Cerberus Capital Management LP. More to the point, the “transaction” will result in a $700 million write down in the second quarter. Oh, and Daimler will “forgive” $1.3 to $1.7 billion worth of “loans” to Chrysler. And “contribute” $600 million to the US automaker’s pension plans over the next three years. Meanwhile, Daimler’s own haus is on fire . . .

Even with cash4clunker mania sweeping its domestic market—and zen ze world!—the German automaker is not doing well in the current economic doldrums. It’s just posted “its first back-to-back quarterly losses in at least 10 years.” (How precise is that?)

The first-quarter net loss was 1.3 billion euros ($1.7 billion), or 1.40 euros a share, Stuttgart, Germany-based Daimler said today in a statement. The loss was wider than the 790 million-euro median estimate of a Bloomberg survey of 13 analysts. Daimler shares fell as much as 8.4 percent.

Oops.

Robert Farago
Robert Farago

More by Robert Farago

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 42 comments
  • Greg Locock Greg Locock on Apr 28, 2009

    "[Side note: why does the MSM constantly predict sales and financial results and then report that the actual result was greater/smaller than predicted as if that's big news? Can't they let the companies manage expectations on their own?]" Because it is news, if you are thinking of buying or selling shares in the company. The predictions of the future financial results are baked into a rational buyer's valuation of the net current value of each share, so if the company does not hit its guidance figures the share price will be affected, in a rational market. So it is news, it just isn't very interesting to most people.

  • Robert Farago Robert Farago on Apr 28, 2009

    Greg Locock Ah. Curiosity satisfied. Text removed.

  • Verbal Rented a Malibu a while back. It was fine, if a bit gutless.I get that Detroit wants to go all-in on high profit margin SUVs and blinged-out MAGA trucks. Everyone has known for decades that they can't compete on price in the affordable sedan space. So now all of Detroit's sedans are gone except for a couple of Cadillac models.But you'd think that just one of the domestic brands could produce a fun, competitive and affordable sedan. Just one? Please? Anyone? Bueller?
  • 3-On-The-Tree I wouldn’t even use Ford as a hearse for fear of being late to my party.
  • SCE to AUX Norway is in Europe, and Tesla is an American automaker - no problems there.I wouldn't use Ford as the bellwether.https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/tesla-extends-lead-norway-evs-take-record-82-market-share-2024-01-02/https://elbil.no/english/norwegian-ev-policy/
  • Steve Biro If the U.S. government wants to talk about banning all connected cars - or at least the collection and sharing of information from said vehicles - I’m all ears. Otherwise, don’t waste my time.
  • Ajla Both parties are in favor of banning Chinese vehicles so I don't see how it won't happen in the next year.
Next