Capsule Review: 2009 Acura RL

Robert Farago
by Robert Farago

When a car salesman tells you an expensive model’s pointless, nine times out of ten, it’s pointless. If he proffers this opinion in the depths of a recession, with new car sales lower than Bernie Madoff’s morals, it’s a dead cert. I’ve experienced this vehicular vertigo twice in the last week. First, when contemplating a zero-mile Honda Civic Mugen Si gathering dust in an otherwise empty former Saturn showroom. Second, whilst sitting in an Acura RL, moments away from an extended test drive. The salesman told me flat out that the Acura TL is a better car than the RL, hinting that anyone who buys an RL is a sap. As I’ve rated the TL as a one-star car, where do you go from there?

Nowhere. And not very fast, either. The main difference between the new top-spec TL and the five-year-old face lifted RL: the über-Acura’s less powerful, even less torquey engine. OK, it’s only a five horsepower deficit (300 HP @ 6300 rpm vs. 305 HP @ 6200 rpm). But luxury brands like Porsche didn’t bank the big bucks by dismissing the importance of insignificant differences in engine power. Other than that, you could be looking at, sitting in and driving the exact same car, crashing over broken pavement, safe in the knowledge that you paid $8k for the privilege of . . . a solid piece of wood embedded in the instrument panel.

Strange to say, this indistinguishableousity is something of a triumph. The RL is made in Saitama, Japan. The TL in Marysville, Ohio, alongside Honda Accords. While the RL feels slightly more upmarket, it’s entirely psychological. Which is stupid to the point of imbecility. While Acura customers await the arrival of a V8 RL (or not, on both counts), Honda should have tuned their instantly demoted flagship for comfort. Put them torques (sorry, couldn’t resist) lower down in the rev range and added huge dollops of mush to the suspension. How much could it cost to detune the damn thing?

More to the point, how much did it cost Acura to debase the RL nameplate by replacing it with a less expensive alternative? Not a lot, one imagines, as the company has already sacrificed the legendary Legend to the gods of German-aping alpha numeric model designations. And priced the RL right off any sane comparison shopper’s vehicle list. And, generally, screwed the pooch. So it’s lose-lose for all concerned—save those who wouldn’t dream of buying an $50k RL. Which is a large and ever-increasing population.

Robert Farago
Robert Farago

More by Robert Farago

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 54 comments
  • Klossfam Klossfam on Feb 06, 2009

    Robert - Some tools at Temple of VTEC didn't appreciate your capsule but I was highly entertained...The RL is possibly the most irrelevant luxo (sort of) sedan on the road today...Keep on doing God's work! My Post at TOV>>>> Re: RL Gets Ripped a New One... 02-05-2009 22:18 klossfam: This sums it up and I totally agree with Mr. Farago from TTAC... http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/capsule-review-2009-acura-rl/ _____________ HondaMotorCo007: What waste of time. The article is truly garbage and it seems as though all those posts at the bottom were written by the same person. _____________ Acuradrian: agree ______________ klossfam: If you don't find TTAC funny, then you have no sense of humor whatsoever...or you are blinded by the reflection off the beak of the nearest 2009 Acura product...TTAC is correct 90% of the time.

  • Jcow4096 Jcow4096 on Feb 06, 2009

    It occurs to me that all of the remarkable cars put out in America as Acuras in the past have truthfully been rebadged Hondas. The NSX, the Integra, the Legend, the TSX: all Hondas with a fancy "A" on the hood. To me, Acura always fought the good fight with one-hand tied behind its back. Only recently has it been given leave to branch out on its own, especially with its new advanced design center. And now Acura is finding out that this premium, luxury thing isn't as easy as it seems. Still, had this been the old Acura, maybe we could have gotten the European Civic hatchback as an Acura RSX? Maybe only I am dreaming this particular dream. To this review: outside of the Acura, exterior sheet metal, Honda has missed with this arrow and it's target "market segment". It normally puzzles me that in a discussion about the modern Acura, everybody brings up how Honda has failed. In this case, I agree. Though I disagree that the 2009 RL is yet another indicator that Honda has lost its way. That Honda's corporate culture nicely coincided with the sport compact/car enthusiast demand in the 80's and 90's doesn't mean that the mothership has jumped the shark in the new millennium. The shark swims this way, Honda keeps skiing that way. This lady's not for turning, and all that. Honda's products still exemplify the core qualities as they ever have: offering advanced engines, offering maximum machine in an minimalistic package, offering environmentally conscientious products.

  • Theflyersfan If this saves (or delays) an expensive carbon brushing off of the valves down the road, I'll take a case. I understand that can be a very expensive bit of scheduled maintenance.
  • Zipper69 A Mini should have 2 doors and 4 cylinders and tires the size of dinner plates.All else is puffery.
  • Theflyersfan Just in time for the weekend!!! Usual suspects A: All EVs are evil golf carts, spewing nothing but virtue signaling about saving the earth, all the while hacking the limbs off of small kids in Africa, money losing pits of despair that no buyer would ever need and anyone that buys one is a raging moron with no brains and the automakers who make them want to go bankrupt.(Source: all of the comments on every EV article here posted over the years)Usual suspects B: All EVs are powered by unicorns and lollypops with no pollution, drive like dreams, all drivers don't mind stopping for hours on end, eating trays of fast food at every rest stop waiting for charges, save the world by using no gas and batteries are friendly to everyone, bugs included. Everyone should torch their ICE cars now and buy a Tesla or Bolt post haste.(Source: all of the comments on every EV article here posted over the years)Or those in the middle: Maybe one of these days, when the charging infrastructure is better, or there are more options that don't cost as much, one will be considered as part of a rational decision based on driving needs, purchasing costs environmental impact, total cost of ownership, and ease of charging.(Source: many on this site who don't jump on TTAC the split second an EV article appears and lives to trash everyone who is a fan of EVs.)
  • The Oracle Some commenters have since passed away when this series got started.
  • The Oracle Honda is generally conservative yet persistent, this will work in one form or fashion.
Next