3 Views
S60 Concept: The Car That Won't Save Volvo
by
Robert Farago
(IC: employee)
Published: January 11th, 2009
Share
Robert Farago
More by Robert Farago
Published January 11th, 2009 10:58 AM
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- 28-Cars-Later I thought Skeletor banned Tiktok?
- Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Next step is coercion.
- Kwik_Shift_Pro4X And now to see the long term consequences for such convenience. 🧐
- 28-Cars-Later Well, I can live in the mansion.
- Lorenzo Why are all these devices being invented, that take the driving out of driving? Is it because there are too many people with driver's licenses who should be taking taxi's and public transportation?
Comments
Join the conversation
@Jimal I think it is overly sentimental to say that Volvo sold its soul when it went to FWD. The 240 was indeed a safe car. The solid steel cage around the passenger compartment saved many lives. But its only other safety feature was three-point seatbelts (first used by Volvo in 1959). The FWD Volvos incorporated now ubiquitous modern safety features into one package: ABS, front and side airbags, a whiplash protection system, seat belt pre-tensioners, etc. When Volvo REALLY sold its soul to Ford in 1999, it sold more cars than ever before -- about 3.5 million in nine years. 2004 was an all-time high for Volvo with 460,000 cars sold. They have never sold less than 400,000 a year under Ford (until 2008). In comparison, Volvo sold 2.8 million 240s -- between 1975 and 1993 (18 years). Numbers don't tell the whole story, of course. We all have expectations for what a car should or shouldn't be, and what its value is to us. But I don't see where Volvo has betrayed its identity by moving upmarket. Volvos are the best they have ever been in every way. My V50 T5 makes my old 240 seem like a Model T. And it is every bit a Volvo to me -- a much better, safer one.