LA Red Light Ticket Cameras Have Quotas. No, Really.

Robert Farago
by Robert Farago
The Newspaper does it again, exposing the hidden cash grab behind the blogger’s bugaboo: red light cameras. “In 2000 the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Agency signed a $3,497,960 contract with a Dallas-based firm, now known as Affiliated Computer Services (ACS), to issue pricey photo citations at seventeen railroad crossings. The county further ordered the company to keep a steady flow of tickets, or face corrective action… The contract sets as the baseline that the company must issue 25 tickets for every 100 alleged violations recorded by the machine. These recordings include any number of situations where either no real offense took place, or the driver cannot be positively identified — as required under California law. Nonetheless, if the total number of citations mailed falls under 25 per 100, the corrective steps must be taken to boost the number of citations mailed. In effect, this provides a direct incentive to the contractor to issue tickets regardless of whether the machine properly captured a true violation. There is no penalty under state law for a contractor to guess, for example, a license plate number when the image is unreadable.” As I don’t want to be responsible for mass blood boiling, I won’t tell you about the memo from a Roseville police chief telling his pencil pushers how to hide the hypocrisy. Suffice it to say, the safety argument doesn’t seem to be anyone’s primary concern in all this.
Robert Farago
Robert Farago

More by Robert Farago

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 27 comments
  • R H R H on Sep 10, 2008

    hansbos> As a motorcyclist (90% summer driving)/cager (10% summer driver), I'd like to see traffic enforcement against bicyclists. I have almost killed 5-6 bicyclists in 4 months (and I'm a VERY light driver.....car, 3-4k miles per year, motorcycle ~ 2k) because they ignore all traffic signs & regulations. This includes, but is not limited too: 1) Running stop signs. 2) Running red lights. 3) Riding on the wrong side of the street. 4) Listening to headphones/not paying attention. I almost hit one guy who was listening to his ipod while driving on the wrong side of the street running a red light! I stopped & he never saw me.. Waiting for the bus the other day, I counted how many bicyclists slowed down (not stopped) for the stop sign at my bus stop and it was 1 in 6. Just because it's their fault when I hit & kill them won't make me feel any better when it actually happens.

  • Hriehl1 Hriehl1 on Sep 10, 2008

    I think they should use the dunking technigue used in the 1600s to identify witches in Salem MA... Dunk 'em in water... if they drown, they're innocent, if they live they're guilty. How have we lost so much control of our society?

  • V8fairy Not scared, but I would be reluctant to put my trust in it. The technology is just not quite there yet
  • V8fairy Headlights that switch on/off with the ignition - similar to the requirement that Sweden has- lights must run any time the car is on.Definitely knobs and buttons, touchscreens should only be for navigation and phone mirroring and configuration of non essential items like stereo balance/ fade etc>Bagpipes for following too close.A following distance warning system - I'd be happy to see made mandatory. And bagpipes would be a good choice for this, so hard to put up with!ABS probably should be a mandatory requirementI personally would like to have blind spot monitoring, although should absolutely NOT be mandatory. Is there a blind spot monitoring kit that could be rerofitted to a 1980 Cadillac?
  • IBx1 A manual transmission
  • Bd2 All these inane posts (often referencing Hyundai, Kia) the past week are by "Anal" who has been using my handle, so just ignore them...
  • 3-On-The-Tree I was disappointed that when I bought my 2002 Suzuki GSX1300R that the Europeans put a mandatory speed limiter on it from 197mph down to 186mph for the 2002 year U.S models.
Next