By on July 1, 2008

061201_ford_hmed_11ahmedium.jpgThere's no way to sugarcoat it: Ford's June sales sucked. Ford dealers moved 28 percent less metal– 167K vehicles– than last June. Compared with the first half of 2007, FoMoCo's sales fell a full 14 percent. In all fairness, the numbers are the first which don't include Jaguar and Land Rover (sold off to Tata motors). But based on recent months' sales, the two brands would have only added about another 4k sales. So it still sucks. Retail sales for cars were up three percent; cars and crossovers made up 59 percent of retail sales for the first half of the year. Fleet sales were down 11 percent for June. Ford mouthpiece Jim Farley explained "the rapid rise in gasoline prices, and the resulting shift toward fuel efficient vehicles, has been challenging." But fear not! "In addition to adjusting our capacity and production plans to produce more cars and crossovers, we are introducing several new vehicles with class-leading fuel economy." Hope springs eternal, but will it be this spring?

Click here for full Ford Press Release 

12 Comments on “Ford June Sales Plummet 28%...”


  • avatar
    TEXN3

    I guess it’s gotta get worse before it gets better…right? How much worse can it get though?

    Glancing quickly through the press release numbers, there are a few vehicles that are being halted or have already and that results in a -100% change, does that greatly affect the total percentage from 07 to 08?

    The rate of increase for the Focus is starting to steadily slowdown a bit. Is this is a sign that people who wanted one got one or that people aren’t buying as many cars (regardless of size and efficiency) right now.

  • avatar
    KatiePuckrik

    Oh dear. Chances are the majority of that sales drop is from the lack of sales of pick ups and SUV’s (i.e their cash cows) and since Ford are bearing much (if any) profit on their cars, this means two things:

    1. Ford are still hameorraging market share.

    and

    2. Their profits are still going to be dismal.

    However, if they can sustain themselves until next year, I reckon they should be able to reverse this with cars which bear a profit.

  • avatar
    poweredByHonda

    ok.. I’ll admit I’m biased here…

    American Honda sales up 13.8% on a Daily Sales Rate for month of June 2008, as compared to June 2007 (for both Acura and Honda divisions)

  • avatar
    hitman1970

    poweredByHonda,

    Biased? Couldn’t be. ;)

    This is the first salvo in the domestic sales suck-fest this month.

    Good grief. I hope I have the option of buying from an domestic auto company come 2012.

  • avatar
    RobertSD

    But the key is even if they are only making, say, $300 on a Focus, if every car just made $300, Ford would be profitable, which is better than they have been in the past.

    Focus has seen nearly a $3500 change in net margin in a year. That’s what content and lower manufacturing costs get you. If you slowly work through your line and do that, you become profitable.

    This will still reflect negatively on Ford’s profits, but it doesn’t guarantee long-term losses. The difference here is that instead of giving away the F-150, they stopped production. That’s $11000 on raw material they aren’t dumping on the lot with $4000 of invested labor and transport and prep just to sell it for $12000. And that change what makes a company profitable.

    What I am most worried about is how much of Ford’s poor performance was related to GM’s 0% financing giveaway. If it was too direct, it means that people still aren’t cross-shopping with the key Japanese brands – and that is a far grimmer long-term issue than actually mix of sales. However, it is of note, that other than the “employee pricing” on the F-150, I didn’t see any large sales at all at Ford. Even at Toyota, I was seeing some hefty sales – and I live in Toyota-land.

    And that’s the key – stopping the hemorraging at some point soon (relative to the market) and making sure that Ford is *considered* if not purchased in most transactions. This is just one month… Ford’s real challenges, honestly, are still about 12 months ahead.

  • avatar
    KatiePuckrik

    Holy hell! Toyota down by 21%!

  • avatar
    Brendan

    I would suspect that the gas spike has less to do with this than the ongoing (and going and going) housing meltdown. There is no clear scenario for a meaningful recovery in housing, and that screws the economy as a whole. Even if the slump housing prices ends, there is still way too much capital tied up in home markets that have permanently popped.

    In a lot of ways it’s like the car industry; trucks are not unlike deep suburban developments: energy intensive, low cost/high margin, and extremely sensitive to commodity prices.

    It’s grim.

  • avatar
    26theone

    Gas was ~2.90 a gallon during June 07. Around 4.10 one year later.

  • avatar
    ttacgreg

    Meanwhile I just saw a story on another website where Toyota, the 2.8 & others in some sort manufacturer’s association is bitching to the government how the newly implemented fuel efficiency standards are too burdensome for the. WAAAA! you Feds just colluded with us to beat back California’s even more demanding standards. Now we are gonna complain some more!
    Got news for you manufacturers, looks like the “free market” just moved the bar on you pretty much overnight, far faster than the government ever would.
    Not so long ago I heard Auto journalists dissing Honda for the Ridgeline being too small, and now even its sales have dumped for Honda. I guess now its too big!

  • avatar
    Geotpf

    Pickup sales are being hit with a double whammy-gas prices are insanely high and housing starts are insanely low. Pickup sales have always been tied very closely to housing starts. So, ttacgreg, the Ridgeline was down merely because it’s a pickup. The Ranger was down 33.8%, even though it’s the smallest pickup for sale in the US.

  • avatar
    limmin

    Those new CAFE standards are a consummate disgrace. They will be the final nail in the car industry’s coffin.

    I hope that entire CAFE legislation is gutted and eviscerated like a grizzly chowing down on a salmon. Give the industry 10 years to hit 30mpg or so. 35mpg is absolutely unreasonable.

    We don’t need CAFE to get more fuel efficient cars. The market, as usual, took care of it.

  • avatar
    adam0331

    Those new CAFE standards are a consummate disgrace. They will be the final nail in the car industry’s coffin.

    I hardly doubt CAFE standards will spell the end for the auto industry. They might spell the end for the likes of the Detroit 2.8, but I have little doubt that Honda & Toyota will find a way to comply.

    Unfortunately CAFE will become an excuse for the downfall of Detroit, even though the market is demanding over 35mpg right now. If the revised CAFE standards were implemented 10+ years ago I highly doubt we’d be looking at the 2.8′s sales off 25+ percent.


Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

You can also login using Facebook Connect. Connect with Facebook

Subscribe without commenting

Recent Comments

  • Re: Review: 2013 Nissan Altima

    icemilkcoffee - Yup. Typical of both Nissan and Ford. Their products look good in the showroom. Not so good in your driveway, and downright nasty in your garage.
  • Re: Review: 2013 Nissan Altima

    Educator(of teachers)Dan - Right NOW while 2012s are still on the lots I would buy a V6 model because it is a screaming deal. One of the reasons Altimas are so popular in my...
  • Re: Volkswagen Chattanooga: German Unions Damn UAW Drive With Faint Support

    Pch101 - “Because IG Metall wants it for themselves.” I wouldn’t assume that. If VW’s US operations were to...
  • Re: Renault Revives The Berlinette, Maybe

    fabriced28 - No offense meant, but your description of Alpine is quite off the mark. As already pointed out by another commenter, it is especially not Renault’s...
  • Re: Review: 2013 Nissan Altima

    EChid - Yeah, it’s amazing how few reviews of the Sonata (with the exception of TTAC’s) seem to point towards in generally more noisy interior and unrefined ride....
  • Re: Beater Edition: Rent, Lease, Sell or Keep

    Sinistermisterman - Sell it as is, or kill it. It’s not worth the time, effort or aggravation to do anything else with it. Even if the engine is toast, at...
  • Re: Review: 2013 Nissan Altima

    Michael Karesh - They seem to expect many people interested in the V6 to buy the Maxima instead. But the Maxima is about $4,000 more. My initial thought on hearing that the V6...
  • Re: Review: 2013 Nissan Altima

    -Cole- - Great review Mike!
  • Re: Volkswagen Chattanooga: German Unions Damn UAW Drive With Faint Support

    mikey - @highdesertcat….I agree with some of what you say. Lets be clear. GM: The US treasury owns 32 percent? in the form of...
  • Re: Review: 2013 Nissan Altima

    Banger - Oh, and to your point about the high cost to fix the CVTs: That’s because, by my understanding, there’s not a lot the dealer service departments can do to...

 

Staff