Tata Motors. Profile of an Indian Car Company in Trouble

John Horner
by John Horner

India’s Tata has gone from darling to dumpling in just a year. The high profile Nano People’s Car project still hasn’t gone into production, and the $2.3b purchase of Jaguar and Land Rover now seems spectacularly ill-timed. Business Week recently covered the story with these great opening notes: “What a difference a year makes.” India is in the throes of its own economic crisis; thanks to high inflation, high interest rates, tight credit markets, excessive corporate debt and a suddenly spending averse middle class. Pretty much like most places in the world, but a little different.

The Nano project crashed into a virtual brick wall last year when local protests caused Tata to abandon the nearly completed Nano production facility; after investing $350m . . . and before building any saleable cars.

Meanwhile, Tata’s big dog status in India’s commercial vehicle market (over 60 percent share) became a liability when that market plunged precipitously (40 percent!). India faces its first manufacturing and services exports decline in modern history.

Government spending, however, is being ramped up to soften the blow to Tata. Ergo: “On Wednesday, the company bagged a $450 million, 12-year contract to build and maintain buses for the city of New Delhi, which is in the midst of upgrading its infrastructure.”

Sounding familiar yet?

While all that is going on at home, the expensive short term bridge loans used last year to temporarily finance the Jaguar/Land-Rover purchase are coming due with no real prospects for replacing them. Although the UK has announced loans to keep the British auto industry afloat, it isn’t clear if Tata will be able to get its mitts on any of that money to pay down those bridge loans.

The usual unnamed sources at Tata are said to have said: “Of course, we plan to apply for as much help as we can get under that program, but the indication we’ve gotten from the [government officials] there is that the loans are intended to help keep production lines running, not directly pay off accumulated debt.”

The rapid expansion of Tata on the backs of a booming home market, executive enthusiasm and easy credit markets has put the company in dire stress. But, hey, Tata can take some small comfort that it is in better shape than outsourcing titan Satyam Computer Services, which has seen three executives (so far) carted off to jail in a billion dollar accounting scandal.

Compared to that, Tata is in good shape. Rut row.

John Horner
John Horner

More by John Horner

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 24 comments
  • Kurt. Kurt. on Feb 03, 2009
    Geo. Levecque asked "why should the UK Taxpayer pay for them to make Cars?" Because those cars are STILL built in the UK, with (some say) UK workers. If Tata has to close those plants, the UK will be paying anyway with unemployment and lost wages in their communities. I could be way off base here but aren't the Rover engines built in Germany? Maybe the Germans will fess up some cash too? Time to go a beggin'...
  • Jack Baruth Jack Baruth on Feb 03, 2009

    I admire Mr. Tata for his determination to put his people on wheels, but the Nano and its inevitable competition would have amounted to a climatological apocalypse. Assuming you believe in AGW, that is. It would be better, from a resource consumption standpoint, to simply wave a magic wand and turn every new car on sale in the United States into an Escalade ESV.

  • Redapple2 jeffbut they dont want to ... their pick up is 4th behind ford/ram, Toyota. GM has the Best engineers in the world. More truck profit than the other 3. Silverado + Sierra+ Tahoe + Yukon sales = 2x ford total @ $15,000 profit per. Tons o $ to invest in the BEST truck. No. They make crap. Garbage. Evil gm Vampire
  • Rishabh Ive actually seen the one unit you mentioned, driving around in gurugram once. And thats why i got curious to know more about how many they sold. Seems like i saw the only one!
  • Amy I owned this exact car from 16 until 19 (1990 to 1993) I miss this car immensely and am on the search to own it again, although it looks like my search may be in vane. It was affectionatly dubbed, " The Dragon Wagon," and hauled many a teenager around the city of Charlotte, NC. For me, it was dependable and trustworthy. I was able to do much of the maintenance myself until I was struck by lightning and a month later the battery exploded. My parents did have the entire electrical system redone and he was back to new. I hope to find one in the near future and make it my every day driver. I'm a dreamer.
  • Jeff Overall I prefer the 59 GM cars to the 58s because of less chrome but I have a new appreciation of the 58 Cadillac Eldorados after reading this series. I use to not like the 58 Eldorados but I now don't mind them. Overall I prefer the 55-57s GMs over most of the 58-60s GMs. For the most part I like the 61 GMs. Chryslers I like the 57 and 58s. Fords I liked the 55 thru 57s but the 58s and 59s not as much with the exception of Mercury which I for the most part like all those. As the 60s progressed the tail fins started to go away and the amount of chrome was reduced. More understated.
  • Theflyersfan Nissan could have the best auto lineup of any carmaker (they don't), but until they improve one major issue, the best cars out there won't matter. That is the dealership experience. Year after year in multiple customer service surveys from groups like JD Power and CR, Nissan frequency scrapes the bottom. Personally, I really like the never seen new Z, but after having several truly awful Nissan dealer experiences, my shadow will never darken a Nissan showroom. I'm painting with broad strokes here, but maybe it is so ingrained in their culture to try to take advantage of people who might not be savvy enough in the buying experience that they by default treat everyone like idiots and saps. All of this has to be frustrating to Nissan HQ as they are improving their lineup but their dealers drag them down.
Next