GM's 90-Day Progress Report

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

90 days out of bankruptcy, GM is taking a moment to explain just how well the turnaround thing is going. Or, to use the PR-present tense, how GM “Accelerates its Focus on Customers, Cars and Culture.” CEO Fritz Henderson explains in the report press release (PDF):

Over the past ninety days since we created the new GM, we’ve already launched a number of new, fuel-efficient, highly successful cars and crossovers; introduced a new marketing campaign that highlights our best-in-class fuel economy, quality, warranty and safety performance; sworn in a new Board of Directors; and overhauled our management. We are taking aggressive actions and moving quickly to transform our culture into one that is truly customer focused

Everything you need to know about this exercise in corporate affirmations (I’m good enough, I’m smart enough, and doggone it, people like me!) can be found in the slide (above) titled “Concerns” from the report’s accompanying presentation (PDF). Nothing about the crisis surrounding Daewoo. Nothing about a steady erosion in sales that no marketing effort has been able to turn around. Nothing about binge-and-purge inventory “management.” Nothing about the near-impossibility of showing a profit by the planned IPO. In short, GM glossed over its issues like a 12 year old with her first stick of Lip Smackers.

Little encapsulates GM’s “we’re still changing but everything’s fine” line as well as the departure of Mark LaNeve. Hated by many dealers, and the architect of years of dismal sales results, LaNeve is a perfect symbol of old GM (but hey, what senior exec at New GM isn’t?). And on the one hand, GM is using his departure as an opportunity to say things like “we are taking aggressive actions and moving quickly to transform our culture into one that is truly customer focused.” In fact, Henderson went as far as to say “I do think there is a benefit to bringing in outsider. I think we would benefit from fresh perspective.” But Henderson also refused to use the opportunity to draw a line in the sand on sales results, preferring to let his euphemism that “Mark’s going to join another company to pursue an interest outside the auto industry,” dangle ominously. At least it would have been ominous, had LaNeve not overseen eight years of weak results before being allowed to “pursue other opportunities” post-bankruptcy.

The rest of the report is full of cheery optimism, that seems more based in turn of phrase and cognitive dissonance than reality. Under the heading “Improved Sales Performance,” The General notes “the company’s U.S. market share was 19.5 percent in the third quarter, consistent with the first half of the year. U.S. market share in 2008 was 22.1 percent.” How is that “improved” in any way? The dealer wind-down portion says nothing of ongoing meetings between dealers, GM, Chrysler and congress which have the potential to restore lost franchises, and undo GM’s dealer cull. Sales of the Hummer and Opel brands are noted as “ progressing,” despite one rejection of the Hummer deal by China, and threats of EU intervention in the Opel transaction (not to mention potential negative effects of the Opel sale, should it go through).

And this optimism isn’t going away. In preparation for its IPO, and “as a newly created entity, GM is continuing to implement “fresh-start” reporting, which encompasses the determination of the fair value of its assets and liabilities, by March 31, 2010.” And then comes the IPO. GM has proved that it can ignore looming problems literally for decades, so why not a few months? There’s always time to worry about things after investors re-prop-up the company.

Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 18 comments
  • Mach1 Mach1 on Oct 08, 2009

    GM announced yesterday that they still have 10,000 too many heads on the staff that need to go by year end, Anyone think this won;t be disruptive?

  • Anonymous Anonymous on Oct 08, 2009

    "Bunter1 : October 7th, 2009 at 4:20 pm Autosavant-I have seen two road tests with mpg on the NuNox (Edmunds and CR). Can’t vouch for Edmunds method but they did say that they expected better (21 mpg, they usually get closer to the EPA est. apparently). CR uses a consistent method with multiple drivers and they got lower mpg (21 mpg)" I saw the same CR test yesterday, your 21 is average ,not highway. CR did get 30 highway, which is quite good, if not exactly 32. They probably were doing 55 .. or less than 65 anyway.

  • Amy I owned this exact car from 16 until 19 (1990 to 1993) I miss this car immensely and am on the search to own it again, although it looks like my search may be in vane. It was affectionatly dubbed, " The Dragon Wagon," and hauled many a teenager around the city of Charlotte, NC. For me, it was dependable and trustworthy. I was able to do much of the maintenance myself until I was struck by lightning and a month later the battery exploded. My parents did have the entire electrical system redone and he was back to new. I hope to find one in the near future and make it my every day driver. I'm a dreamer.
  • Jeff Overall I prefer the 59 GM cars to the 58s because of less chrome but I have a new appreciation of the 58 Cadillac Eldorados after reading this series. I use to not like the 58 Eldorados but I now don't mind them. Overall I prefer the 55-57s GMs over most of the 58-60s GMs. For the most part I like the 61 GMs. Chryslers I like the 57 and 58s. Fords I liked the 55 thru 57s but the 58s and 59s not as much with the exception of Mercury which I for the most part like all those. As the 60s progressed the tail fins started to go away and the amount of chrome was reduced. More understated.
  • Theflyersfan Nissan could have the best auto lineup of any carmaker (they don't), but until they improve one major issue, the best cars out there won't matter. That is the dealership experience. Year after year in multiple customer service surveys from groups like JD Power and CR, Nissan frequency scrapes the bottom. Personally, I really like the never seen new Z, but after having several truly awful Nissan dealer experiences, my shadow will never darken a Nissan showroom. I'm painting with broad strokes here, but maybe it is so ingrained in their culture to try to take advantage of people who might not be savvy enough in the buying experience that they by default treat everyone like idiots and saps. All of this has to be frustrating to Nissan HQ as they are improving their lineup but their dealers drag them down.
  • SPPPP I am actually a pretty big Alfa fan ... and that is why I hate this car.
  • SCE to AUX They're spending billions on this venture, so I hope so.Investing during a lull in the EV market seems like a smart move - "buy low, sell high" and all that.Key for Honda will be achieving high efficiency in its EVs, something not everybody can do.
Next