Renault Keeps Ghosn as Chairman and CEO As Probe Reveals No Wrongdoing

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Two automakers, two investigations, and two very different outcomes for one man.

Renault’s board of directors met in France today, deciding that CEO and chairman Carlos Ghosn should stay on in his current role in the wake of an internal investigation that members say showed no signs of criminality. Meanwhile, Ghosn sits in a Tokyo jail, indicted on charges of financial misconduct at Renault’s alliance partner, Nissan.

Away from the Paris streets, it seems everything’s hunky dory in France.

While the Renault probe turned up no illegality in regards to Ghosn’s finances on the French side of alliance, Nissan’s internal investigation turned up enough evidence to prompt the former Nissan chairman’s arrest. The Japanese automaker’s board voted to drop Ghosn after that country’s authorities nabbed Ghosn in Tokyo on Nov. 19.

In a media release, Renault stated:

As part of the agenda, Claude Baland, Senior Advisor in charge of Ethics and Compliance, and Eric Le Grand Chief Ethics and Compliance Officer, presented to the Board of Directors of Groupe Renault the current status of the review concerning the compensation of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Renault for the years 2015-2018 which was undertaken on November 23, 2018. Their preliminary conclusion is that the compensation of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Renault and the conditions under which such compensation was approved were in compliance with applicable law as well as the recommendations of the AFEP-MEDEF.

Japan, as well as Nissan, accuses Ghosn and board member John Kelly (since dropped from its ranks) of under-reporting Ghosn’s income by nearly $80 million between 2010 and 2017. The Japanese indictment, handed down earlier this week, pertains to the 2010-2014 period. Ghosn denies he hid income in statements to Japan’s finance ministry; rather, through his lawyer he claims the compensation was deferred income, to be paid out after his departure. It wasn’t necessary to reveal this income at the time, he claims, though Japan will have the last word on that.

Just yesterday, it was revealed that Nisan received approval to hand over the results of its investigation to Renault. The board has still not had an opportunity to question Ghosn.

“We believe we need to wait on what Carlos Ghosn has to say about this one-sided investigation,” a person familiar with the board meeting told the Wall Street Journal.

In its statement, Renault said, “The Board of Directors requested that Renault’s lawyers continue their review and assessment of the information provided, in liaison with Nissan’s lawyers, and promptly provide the Board with a new update on the situation.”

In addition to reviewing the Nissan dossier, Renault will continue probing financial reports going further back in time. For now, the relationship between the two intertwined automakers remains strained.

[Image: Nissan]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 13 comments
  • Ravenchris Ravenchris on Dec 13, 2018

    I hope Mr. Ghosn beats the rap.

  • Erikstrawn Erikstrawn on Dec 17, 2018

    Ghosn is guilty, he knew he was hiding his pay. Nissan is guilty, they turned a blind eye because he was successful. Now Renault's about to seize control of the whole corporate structure and this is a desperate gambit by Nissan to remain independent. The Japanese government has a dog in the fight because if Ghosn goes free it legitimizes corporate sovereignty over national sovereignty. As much as I like what Ghosn did for Nissan, he needs to face the music for violating Japanese law, if that part is proven. The Nissan board also needs to face jail time for their complicity. Renault needs to go ahead and absorb Nissan and Mitsubishi. France and Japan need to defend their sovereignty through regulation and rule of law, even if the companies stocks go down for a bit.

  • El scotto They should be supping with a very, very long spoon.
  • El scotto [list=1][*]Please make an EV that's not butt-ugly. Not Jaguar gorgeous but Buick handsome will do.[/*][*] For all the golf cart dudes: A Tesla S in Plaid mode will be the fastest ride you'll ever take.[/*][*]We have actual EV owners posting on here. Just calmly stated facts and real world experience. This always seems to bring out those who would argue math.[/*][/list=1]For some people an EV will never do, too far out in the country, taking trips where an EV will need recharged, etc. If you own a home and can charge overnight an EV makes perfect sense. You're refueling while you're sleeping.My condo association is allowing owners to install chargers. You have to pay all of the owners of the parking spaces the new electric service will cross. Suggested fee is 100$ and the one getting a charger pays all the legal and filing fees. I held out for a bottle of 30 year old single malt.Perhaps high end apartments will feature reserved parking spaces with chargers in the future. Until then non home owners are relying on public charge and one of my neighbors is in IT and he charges at work. It's call a perk.I don't see company owned delivery vehicles that are EV's. The USPS and the smiley boxes should be the 1st to do this. Nor are any of our mega car dealerships doing this and but of course advertising this fact.I think a great many of the EV haters haven't came to the self-actualization that no one really cares what you drive. I can respect and appreciate what you drive but if I was pushed to answer, no I really don't care what you drive. Before everyone goes into umbrage over my last sentence, I still like cars. Especially yours.I have heated tiles in my bathroom and my kitchen. The two places you're most likely to be barefoot. An EV may fall into to the one less thing to mess with for many people.Macallan for those who were wondering.
  • EBFlex The way things look in the next 5-10 years no. There are no breakthroughs in battery technology coming, the charging infrastructure is essentially nonexistent, and the price of entry is still way too high.As soon as an EV can meet the bar set by ICE in range, refueling times, and price it will take off.
  • Jalop1991 Way to bury the lead. "Toyota to offer two EVs in the states"!
  • Jalop1991 I'm sorry, Dave. I'm afraid I can't do that.
Next