2019 Toyota Sienna: Bringing All-wheel Drive to More of the Masses

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

As the Ford Aerostar and Toyota Previa fade from our collective memory, one could be forgiven for thinking minivans were always a front-drive proposition. As for winter-beating all-wheel drive, a laundry list of crossovers and SUV fill that buying space, poaching sales from the once-hot minivan segment.

Still, one model continues offering four-wheel traction for buyers who aren’t scared of being seen in a traditionally uncool minivan. That model, the Toyota Sienna, enters 2019 with more AWD availability. As an underdog in the segment, it seems Toyota wants to sell its offering as the more family-friendly SUV alternative.

First noticed on order guides by CarsDirect but now live on Toyota’s consumer website, the 2019 Sienna isn’t relegating the AWD option solely to the top-spec XLE trim level. Now, buyers of mid-range SE and SE Premium models can fling snow from their rear rubber, too.

While the base LE ($32,160 after destination) remains front-drive-only, the trickle-down AWD option means getting into a grippier Sienna is significantly cheaper than last year. An AWD SE stickers for $39,815 after destination, compared to $38,310 for a front-drive model. Moving up to an SE Premium AWD means forking over $45,910.

Choosing AWD means swapping the front-drive model’s 19-inch wheels for 18-inch hoops, providing more rim protection during those inescapable off-road minivan excursions. You’ll also forgo the eight-passenger interior for a seven-person layout, though backseat passengers might find the perforated leather captain’s chairs more to their liking, anyway. Standard goodies include an Entune 3.0 Audio Plus system with Apple CarPlay and Amazon Alexa, navigation, and Toyota’s app suite.

With Chrysler’s Pacifica and Honda’s Odyssey offering fresher sheetmetal, the Sienna’s sales year hasn’t been a good one. July sales sank 39.1 percent in the U.S., with volume over the first seven months of 2018 dropping 21.6 percent. With 52,761 units sold by the end of July, the Sienna’s volume is 44.2 percent lower than at the end of July, 2006 — the Sienna’s best sales year.

As for the Sienna’s rivals, Odyssey sales rose 3.8 percent, year to date, with Pacifica volume up 6 percent. The minivan segment’s perpetual best-seller, Dodge’s ancient Grand Caravan, saw its pool of buyers increase 8 percent this year.

[Images: Toyota]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 61 comments
  • Dukeisduke Dukeisduke on Aug 16, 2018

    "top-spec XLE trim level" - what happened to the Limited? Limiteds are practically Lexus-like, with gathered leather, wood (okay, it's fake) trim, and items like a memory seat.

  • I_like_stuff I_like_stuff on Aug 17, 2018

    My family had a Sienna. The reason we had a Sienna and not an Odyssey was because Honda didn't provide an AWD option. My wife who made the ultimate decision on which minivan to buy liked the Honda better. But AWD won out, given snow/ice is a daily occurence for us 3-4 months a year. It has always baffled me how Honda ceded that entire market to Toyota. We kept that Sienna for just under 100K miles with absolutely no issues. And talk about holding its value!! MSRP was $37K, we sold it private party 6 years later for $16,500. That was impressive. The one downside were the run flat tires. They lasted 20-25K miles and cost a fortune to replace. I hate those things - run flats - with the passion of 1000 burning suns.

  • V8fairy Bought a 1981 Cadillac Fleetwood Brougham in 1995 with some of the proceeds of selling the house I'd bought with my first ex. I still have it today, so that makes it 31 years. Was my daily for ten years or so. It has become a classic. Also have a 2001 Holden Commodore V8 wagon I bought about 12 years ago which is my current daily driver (although I cycle most of my short trips under 20 km or so). That is now well on its way to classic status so I'm keeping it
  • SCE to AUX Yes, of course it mattered, but it had the greater effect on lower-priced EVs.I used it twice (2012 and 2019) on leased EVs priced at $38k and $30k respectively. I would not have bought them otherwise. The buyout on the 19 was advantageous and the car is/was excellent, so I still have it. Since they were leases, the $7500 came off at purchase - not on my taxes. I have no idea if I would have qualified that way.However, today the EV market is much different - more choice, better vehicles, better values, better charging, and pricing undistorted by the Federal government.EV prices have come way down in the last 6 months, but the reasons are varied.[list=1][*]Some turds won't sell because they're terrible EVs (Charger Daytona EV, ID Buzz)[/*][*]Some EVs are overpriced to begin with (all electric trucks, all BMWs)[/*][*]Some mfrs are trying to maintain market share (Tesla, Hyundai)[/*][*]Some EVs are actually getting cheaper to build (Rivian R2, Model Y)[/*][/list=1]I still want my next car to be electric, and it will be nice to shop without the wacky subsidy rules that 46 put into place. The prior rule was simpler, and had expired for Tesla and GM by the time 46 reinstated a complex version. If the old rule had stayed in place, Hyundai and Ford would also have eventually become exempt, and very few subsidies would have been provided anymore.
  • Slavuta rooting for both teams
  • Lou_BC The Chinese are looking at building a plant in Canada. The can set up shop there.
  • Slavuta Not as bad as replacing a small block
Next