J.D. Power Claims Vehicles Are Becoming Less Reliable

j d power claims vehicles are becoming less reliable

J.D. Power has released its U.S. Initial Quality Study for 2022 and the prognosis could be better. Automobiles are reportedly becoming less reliable and more expensive. While there are certainly valid reasons for this — ongoing supply chain problems, companies transitioning to novel electric powertrains, and remote working environments making it hard to collaborate on engineering — the bottom line is that the whole industry is blowing it.

The study sampled the opinions of 84,165 car buyers (including lessors) between February and May of 2022 to get a sense of how they were finding their new ride. J.D. Power determined that problems rose to a record high for the period, up 11 percent from 2021. That boiled down to an average of 180 problems per every 100 vehicles sampled within the first 90 days of ownership and is the most the outlet has encountered within 36 years.

Breaking things down by manufacturer, Buick took top honors with just 139 reported issues per 100 vehicles. It was followed by Dodge, Chevrolet, Genesis, Kia, and Lexus — all of whom managed under 160 problems per 100 cars.

However, it’s the automakers at the bottom that are the most impressive. Porsche, Infiniti, Jaguar, Alfa Romeo, Mitsubishi, Volkswagen, Audi, Maserati, and Volvo all averaged at least 200 issues per 100 units — with Chrysler at the very bottom with a score of 265. Polestar and Tesla also averaged some fairly heinous numbers at 226 and 328, respectively. But those two were “not officially ranked” by J.D. Power because they did not meet the study award criteria for sample size.

Truth be told, the sample size probably has a lot to do with some of the big disparities seen between years. I was frankly surprised to see General Motors performing this well after having driven around in some of their recent products. But then I remembered what it’s like to motor in some of the other brands and that U.S. product recalls are already on pace to set a record for 2022.

That said, we usually take the Initial Quality Study with an extra-large grain of salt and are hardly alone in that practice. It’s often a better tool for taking the industry’s temperature as a whole than deciding which individual brands/vehicles will actually be problem-free.

This year, J.D. Power determined that initial quality improved on just nine of the 33 brands surveyed. Buick, Chevrolet, GMC, Cadillac, BMW, Mercedes-Benz, Acura, Land Rover, and Audi were the only marques to move up. But I would still argue that the latter half of that list still doesn’t have much reason to celebrate. It’s a lackluster year for just about everyone building cars, with GM being the only brand J.D. Power’s data saw fit to offer any real praise.

So what gives? Well, like last year, the outlet believes that it’s the modern tech going into cars causing a lot of the problems — specifically infotainment systems. This syncs with the claims made in 2021, where a shockingly high percentage of issues were tied to vehicles’ multimedia interface, and also matches the kind of reporting we’re seeing from the latest recall campaigns.

“Automakers continue to launch vehicles that are more and more technologically complex in an era in which there have been many shortages of critical components to support them,” said David Amodeo, director of global automotive at J.D. Power, before adding that the global semiconductor chip shortage is undoubtedly playing a role here.

Companies have effectively been building unfinished vehicles in an effort to keep dealers supplied and asked that stores install the absent chips or some other minor component before sale. But it’s looking like that’s not always happening before the vehicle ends up being adopted. While not a good look for dealers, the industry scapegoating them for effectively failing to deliver a completed automobile isn’t going to fly here. Your author sympathizes with the sad state of the economy and ongoing supply chain hardships. But it’s time to start solving those problems if there’s any hope of 2023 being any better.

Amodeo suggested that improved communication for when missing features or absent components will become available would help with customer satisfaction. But a more apt solution might be for the industry to — and get ready to be blown away with this crazy theory — actually finish the damn cars before putting them on the delivery truck and to stop running with cheap, failure-prone touchscreens.

[Image: Muanpare Wanpen/Shutterstock]

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 56 comments
  • David C. Holzman David C. Holzman on Jul 06, 2022

    Bring back knobs and buttons--dump infotainment.

  • Hifi Hifi 7 days ago

    This is one of JDP's most worthless surveys, but it always gets so much coverage. Until they are able to distinguish between paint defects, fuel economy expectations, number of cup holders, and complete engine failure, the results mean nothing.

  • DenverMike When was it ever a mystery? The Fairmont maybe, but only the 4-door "Futura" trim, that was distinctively upscale. The Citation and Volare didn't have competing trims, nor was there a base stripper Maxima at the time, if ever, crank windows, vinyl seats, 2-doors, etc. So it wasn't a "massacre", not even in spirit, just different market segments. It could be that the Maxima was intended to compete with those, but everything coming from Japan at the time had to take it up a notch, if not two.Thanks to the Japanese "voluntary" trade restriction, everything had extra options, if not hard loaded. The restriction limited how many vehicles were shipped, not what they retailed at. So Japanese automakers naturally raised the "price" (or stakes) without raising MSRP. What the dealers charged (gouged) was a different story.Realistically, the Maxima was going up against entry luxury sedans (except Cimarron lol), especially Euro/German, same as the Cressida. It definitely worked in Japanese automaker's favor, not to mention inspiring Lexus, Acura and Infiniti.
  • Ronnie Schreiber Hydrocarbon based fuels have become unreliable? More expensive at the moment but I haven't seen any lines gathering around gas stations lately, have you? I'm old enough to remember actual gasoline shortages in 1973 and 1979 (of course, since then there have been many recoverable oil deposits discovered around the world plus the introduction of fracking). Consumers Power is still supplying me with natural gas. I recently went camping and had no problem buying propane.Texas had grid problems last winter because they replaced fossil fueled power plants with wind and solar, which didn't work in the cold weather. That's the definition of unreliable.I'm an "all of the above" guy when it comes to energy: fossil fuels, hydro, wind (where it makes sense), nuclear (including funding for fusion research), and possibly solar.Environmental activists, it seems to me, have no interest in energy diversity. Based on what's happened in Sri Lanka and the push against agriculture in Europe and Canada, I think it's safe to say that some folks want most of us to live like medieval peasants to save the planet for their own private jets.
  • Car65688392 thankyou for the information
  • Car65688392 Thankyou for your valuable information
  • MaintenanceCosts There's no mystery anymore about how the Japanese took over the prestige spot in the US mass market (especially on the west coast) when you realize that this thing was up against the likes of the Fairmont, Citation, and Volaré. A massacre.
Next