U.S. Postal Service Decides to Snub Electric Vehicles
The United States Postal Service (USPS) has been under pressure from the White House to replace its aging fleet with all-electric vehicles. But it’s looking like mail carriers will continue doing their jobs in oddly shaped trucks that burn gasoline.
While the Biden administration’s green agenda calls for government fleets to begin transitioning to EVs, the USPS had already decided to purchase 165,000 examples of the Oshkosh Defense NGDV that’s dependent upon liquid fuel. Despite the contractor saying trucks could be converted into battery electric vehicles and/or hybrids, the vast majority will be wholly reliant on internal combustion. The USPS has decided that it’s just not cost-effective or practical to do anything else and no amount of pressure from the White House will be changing its mind.
Money on the other hand…
Postmaster General Louis DeJoy said the agency would consider adding more EVs to its fleet sometime in the future. However, this would be dependent upon the USPS receiving more money from the government – which is pretty much what it’s been saying since before it revealed the Oshkosh trucks in 2021.
“As we have reiterated throughout this process, our commitment to an electric fleet remains ambitious given the pressing vehicle and safety needs of our aging fleet as well as our fragile financial condition. As our financial position improves with the ongoing implementation of our 10-year plan, Delivering for America, we will continue to pursue the acquisition of additional BEV as additional funding – from either internal or congressional sources – becomes available,” DeJoy stated on Wednesday. “But the process needs to keep moving forward. The men and women of the U.S. Postal Service have waited long enough for safer, cleaner vehicles to fulfill on our universal service obligation to deliver to 161 million addresses in all climates and topographies six days per-week.”
One could definitely argue that there were better alternatives to the upcoming NGDV. Effectively a modern version of the Grumman LLV (Long Life Vehicle), the Oshkosh truck offers a familiar experience with better specifications. Those LLVs more than lived up to their namesake, so it’s not surprising to see the post office wanting to stick to what has worked before.
But its efficiency has been criticized by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), which bemoaned its 8.6 mpg as barely better than the old Grumman’s 8.2 mpg. While fleetwide economy will stack to make a real difference, the EPA expressed concerns that the USPS Environmental Impact Statements (EIS) pertaining to the truck were lackluster and should be redone. Though the agency’s current administrator, Michael S. Regan, is an acolyte for all-electric vehicles and seems to be in broad alignment with the Biden administration’s broader agenda to electrify U.S. fleets.
“We thank the federal agencies, including the EPA, for their input,” Mark Guilfoil, USPS’s vice president of supply management, stated this week. “After thorough review and study we determined that EPA’s request for a supplemental [environmental impact statement] and public hearing would not add value to the Postal Service’s already year-long review. It is also important to note that a supplemental EIS and public hearing are not legally required.”
The post office has claimed that loading up its fleet with EVs would be too costly in the short term. While it acknowledged that battery-equipped vehicles were supposed to yield lower operating costs over time, it wasn’t ready to test that theory if it meant spending more upfront. Unless Congress passes a law that would effectively force the USPS to buy up electrics or redirects a bunch of money, all-electric mail trucks will probably remain an uncommon sight in the United States for years to come.
Expect a bunch of lawsuits from environmental groups citing the EPA’s claim that the new (non-BEV) trucks could cause $900 million in climate damages. Though we shouldn’t forget that environmental social governance (ESG) scores, the commodification of carbon credits, and social pressure are often used as leverage to force organizations to act in a manner that’s in accordance with those in power.
Officially, the Postal Service is supposed to be an independent agency that makes decisions (mostly) for itself. Unofficially, the Biden administration wants it to buy electric vehicles from an approved list of mostly unproven manufacturers – including a former frontrunner (Workhorse) that is under investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission and Department of Justice over accusations of fraud.
Robscar on Feb 28, 2022
As I understand, the procurement process was started in 2015. At that time interested vendors were provided a set of specifications that were required to be met. Each vendor was required to produce a certain number of test vehicles for review and testing prior to the contract being awarded. The whole process is very time consuming. To change to an all-electric vehicle would put the process way behind schedule. The oldest LLV went into service in 1987. It's time to put those dogs to rest. I anticipate the USPS will adjust the contract to include a percentage of E-LLV replacements. Those could then be put to use in metro and urban areas, where the infrastructure may be easier to install at larger mail facilities. This would then allow USPS to move the newer ICE units out to the more rural locations where the VPO's (Vehicle Post Office) are smaller and may not yet justify the cost (some offices are very small, physically) of upgrading to EV use. USPS needs to get those old dogs of the street. Third and fourth generation reverse engineered parts sourced from the pacific rim nations makes it very difficult to keep them running safely and reliably.
Latest Car ReviewsRead more
Latest Product ReviewsRead more
- Snickel Fritz I just bought a '97 JX 4WD 4AT, and though it's not quite roadworthy yet I am already in awe of it's simplicity and apparent ruggedness. What I am equally in awe of, is the scarcity of not only parts but correct information regarding anything on this platform. I'm going to do my best to get this little donkey back on it's feet, but I wouldn't suggest this as a project vehicle for anyone who doesn't already have several... and a big impressive shop with a full suite of fabrication/machining/welding equipment, and friends with complimentary skillsets, and extra money, and... you get the idea. If you don't, I urge you to read up on the options for replacing anything on these rigs. I didn't read enough before buying, and I have zero of the above suggested prerequisites... so I'm an idiot, don't listen to me. Go buy all of 'em!
- Bryan Raab Davis I actually did use the P of D trope, but it was only gentle chiding, for I love old British cars of every sort.
- ScarecrowRepair The 1907 Panic had several causes of increased demand for money:[list][*]The semi-annual shift of money between farms and cities (to buy for planting and selling harvests)[/*][*]Britain and Germany borrowing for their naval arms race[/*][*]San Francisco reconstruction borrowing after the 1906 earthquake and fire[/*][/list]Two things made it worse:[list][*]Idiotic bans on branch banking, which prevented urban, rural, and other state branches from shifting funds to match demands. This same problem made the Great Depression far worse. Canada, which allowed branch banking, had no bank failures; the US had 9000 failures.[/*][*]Idiotic reserve requirements left over from the Civil War which prevented banks from loaning money; they eventually started honoring IOUs illegally and started the recovery.[/*][/list]Been a while since I read up on it, so I may have some of the details wrong. But it was an amazing clusterfart which could have been avoided or at least tamed sooner if states and the feds hadn't been so ham handed.
- FreedMike Maybe this explains all the “Idiots wrecking exotic cars” YouTube videos.
- FreedMike Good article! And I salute the author for not using the classic “Lucas - prince of darkness” trope, well earned as it may be. We all know the rap on BL cars, but on the flip side, they’re apparently pretty easy to work on (at least that’s the impression I’ve picked up). On the other hand, check the panel fits on the driver’s and passenger’s doors. Clearly, BL wasn’t much concerned with things like structural integrity when it chopped the roof off a car designed as a coupe.