Toyota Confronting Widespread Factory Stalls in Asia

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Toyota Motor Corp is currently having to contend with idle factories in Asia, reducing the automaker’s estimated output by over 47,000 units this month. Shockingly, it’s not alleged to have anything to do with the semiconductor shortage that’s been wreaking havoc on Western markets.

With chip production having been localized primarily in China and Taiwan, Asian suppliers have had better access to them. But Eastern markets have still been subjected to other routine plant closures due to supply chain restrictions stemming from the pandemic. Existing protocols in China, combined with renewed restrictions in Japan, have created a situation impacting numerous automakers with Toyota announcing this week that it probably won’t reach its goal of manufacturing 9 million cars this year — though it made sure to include the ongoing semiconductor issue as relevant.

After removing the brunt of its COVID-19 restrictions in October, Japan reintroduced some earlier this month in an effort to mitigate rising infection rates of the Omicron variant. Meanwhile, China has continued mandating aggressive testing protocols and harsh restrictions that have caused widespread concerns about global supply chains for 2022. Single infections frequently result in work stoppages and port closures inside the country that have had major ramifications. The Wall Street Journal covered the issue today, expressing fears that Chinese citizens have been running out of food in regions with the worst border restrictions while addressing the broader implications of exported goods being perpetually delayed.

The situation has forced facilities essential for Toyota’s operations in China to remain closed for over a week. This had a ripple effect on the surrounding region, resulting in additional closures in Japan. However, Bloomberg reported that Japan’s own restrictions also played a contributing factor while the company itself was less specific in citing that several important suppliers were having difficulties. All told, Toyota confirmed that over 20 assembly lines split up between 11 plants will need to be idled this month.

From Bloomberg:

A shift on a second production line is also being halted at Toyota’s Tsutsumi plant Thursday. That’s on top of another shift on a different line at the central Japan plant that’s been halted from Wednesday, causing a cut to output of around 1,500 vehicles. Toyota’s popular Camry sedan is among the models manufactured at the factory in Aichi Prefecture.

The factory suspensions are the latest of several setbacks the world’s top-selling automaker has faced as the highly contagious omicron coronavirus variant takes hold in Asia. Toyota also idled operations in Tianjin, China, as the local government carried out mass testing due to a virus flareup in the port city near Beijing.

Toyota said this week it is unlikely to reach its goal of making 9 million cars this fiscal year due to persistent chip shortages plaguing the auto industry. The company’s shares then slumped 5 [percent] Wednesday, their biggest loss since December 2018. They rebounded 1.9 [percent] as of 1:49 p.m. Thursday in Tokyo.

The automaker won’t be alone, however. Other Japanese brands have similarly attributed reduced output to a combination of COVID-19 restrictions and an insufficient number of semiconductors. On Thursday, Honda Motor Co. said its Suzuka plant in the Mie Prefecture would be operating at around 90 percent capacity through next month. Nissan likewise experienced widespread factory issues over the summer. But recently told Bloomberg that it’s in a much better position going into 2022, with CEO Makoto Uchida explaining that the situation still remains fluid.

“We expect the market to recover but the COVID situation is uncertain and we need to be prepared and continue to monitor,” he said.

[Image: Toyota]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 7 comments
  • ToolGuy ToolGuy on Jan 20, 2022

    "Toyota said this week it is unlikely to reach its goal of making 9 million cars this fiscal year" Setting a volume target just to set a volume target is stupid. Is Toyota stupid now? (That would make them Big and Stupid - not a good combination.)

  • Schmitt trigger Schmitt trigger on Jan 21, 2022

    “ They’re simply more agile than other mfrs,” Having worked for many years in the design and manufacturing of electronic modules for automotive applications, I can attest that legacy auto makers are as agile as fish out of the water. Even the most minute change requires an immense amount of paperwork and recertification. This is a direct cause of the requirements first outlined by the big-3 as QS-9000, whose approach is very much prevention driven (*). This prevents unauthorized changes, which if implemented without a thorough analysis and traceability, may have a detrimental future effect. I am not saying that this is wrong, quite the contrary, it is a fundamental cornerstone in the quality improvements that we have seen. Modern automobiles with their extreme complexity could not be built. But rules and regulations, no matter how benign their initial intent, take a perverse turn for the worst. The end result is that while these regulations have prevented many failures, they also prevent agility and in many instances, outright innovation. (*) I know that QS-9000 has been superseded by ISO/TS16949, which in my humble opinion, tightens the leash further.

  • MaintenanceCosts I wish more vehicles in our market would be at or under 70" wide. Narrowness makes everything easier in the city.
  • El scotto They should be supping with a very, very long spoon.
  • El scotto [list=1][*]Please make an EV that's not butt-ugly. Not Jaguar gorgeous but Buick handsome will do.[/*][*] For all the golf cart dudes: A Tesla S in Plaid mode will be the fastest ride you'll ever take.[/*][*]We have actual EV owners posting on here. Just calmly stated facts and real world experience. This always seems to bring out those who would argue math.[/*][/list=1]For some people an EV will never do, too far out in the country, taking trips where an EV will need recharged, etc. If you own a home and can charge overnight an EV makes perfect sense. You're refueling while you're sleeping.My condo association is allowing owners to install chargers. You have to pay all of the owners of the parking spaces the new electric service will cross. Suggested fee is 100$ and the one getting a charger pays all the legal and filing fees. I held out for a bottle of 30 year old single malt.Perhaps high end apartments will feature reserved parking spaces with chargers in the future. Until then non home owners are relying on public charge and one of my neighbors is in IT and he charges at work. It's call a perk.I don't see company owned delivery vehicles that are EV's. The USPS and the smiley boxes should be the 1st to do this. Nor are any of our mega car dealerships doing this and but of course advertising this fact.I think a great many of the EV haters haven't came to the self-actualization that no one really cares what you drive. I can respect and appreciate what you drive but if I was pushed to answer, no I really don't care what you drive. Before everyone goes into umbrage over my last sentence, I still like cars. Especially yours.I have heated tiles in my bathroom and my kitchen. The two places you're most likely to be barefoot. An EV may fall into to the one less thing to mess with for many people.Macallan for those who were wondering.
  • EBFlex The way things look in the next 5-10 years no. There are no breakthroughs in battery technology coming, the charging infrastructure is essentially nonexistent, and the price of entry is still way too high.As soon as an EV can meet the bar set by ICE in range, refueling times, and price it will take off.
  • Jalop1991 Way to bury the lead. "Toyota to offer two EVs in the states"!
Next