Tesla Adding Track Mode to Model S Plaid

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

While it’s possible to catch a glimpse of a Tesla Model S staging at the local dragstrip, they don’t make many appearances at track days. EVs that weren’t designed specifically for racing circuits typically become undone after a few laps of sustained abuse, with Tesla’s first sedan being no different. Early examples of the Model S even failed to get around the Nürburgring when pushed to the limit, with touring car driver Robb Holland sharing videos of the model forcing itself into limp mode as components began overheating during a test run in 2014. Holland praised the car for its sublime road manners, though concluded it was ill-suited for serious racing.

Things are a little different today. Tesla now holds the fastest single lap of any EV to grace the Nordschleife and sells the Model 3 Performance with a dedicated track mode it plans on extending to Model S Plaid vehicles via an over-the-air (OTA) update. But can some fresh code and a little time really do what’s required to make the sedan a valid track vehicle when the preexisting hardware remains unchanged?

The big get with Tesla’s track mode is the ability to tweak or (allegedly) defeat the sedan’s fairly invasive stability control system. Handy during the daily commute, stability control ultimately limits what the car could do on a pristine racetrack. On the Model 3, this results in putting regenerative braking into overdrive and using it to assist with torque vectoring. Though the driver is never really free from getting assistance since the automaker’s vehicle dynamics controller is constantly monitoring things to decide how best to divert power to improve rotation.

However, the biggest gripe among those attempting to race the Model S typically stems from the heat management program erring on the side of caution. This too has been addressed with track mode by offering the same pre-cooling system that’s on the Model 3. Here, Tesla lowers the operating temperature of the battery pack in preparation for the onslaught of heat it’s about to be subjected to. It does the same whenever the car has pulled off the track or is enjoying a cooldown lap. The manufacturer claims the system allows for operation of the powertrain beyond typical thermal limits and increases refrigerant system capacity by overclocking the AC compressor into higher speed ranges.

The rest is about what you’d expect from any track mode. Dampers default to their setting and the infotainment system swaps to displaying all the relevant temperature readings, with a lap timer and G-meter thrown in for good measure.

Unfortunately, I’ve still not seen many Model 3 Performances make more than a handful of laps on any course before it begins issuing warnings about the brakes or battery overheating. But overheating is a common concern among people tracking their street cars and it’s probably not fair to directly compare a Tesla luxury product to something that’s been equipped with an external oil cooler and some tow hooks.

Tesla said this is all about keeping the fastest EV lap time at the Nürburgring and prepping the Model S for a 200-mph top speed that’s supposed to come by way of future OTA updates. I’m inclined to believe this will require a few hardware updates to be accomplished safely, however. As nice as the Model S is to take on the freeway, its steering needs to be sharpened before the company decides to transform it into a four-door hypercar. It’s also going to need better tires and brakes — the latter of which Tesla plans on offering by way of a carbon-ceramic brake kit for $20,000 available later this year. Though they’ll technically cost more than that since you’ll also have to purchase the 21-inch wheels in which to house your fancy stoppers.

With the ability to breeze past 60 mph in the low two-second range, nobody paying attention is going to claim the Model S Plaid isn’t an extremely fast car. But it seems to do all its best work in a straight line and I’m not sure why the manufacturer is so obsessed with competing with Porsche on the Nürburgring. These planned updates will undoubtedly make it more capable from a performance perspective, I just have doubts that it’ll make for a better luxury sedan or set the Model S to replace the Mazda MX-5 as the default track day automobile.

[Image: Virrage Images/Shutterstock]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

Consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulations. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, he has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed about the automotive sector by national broadcasts, participated in a few amateur rallying events, and driven more rental cars than anyone ever should. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and learned to drive by twelve. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer and motorcycles.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
10 of 22 comments
  • Dal20402 Dal20402 on Jan 11, 2022

    The super-fast Teslas just don't seem relevant to daily life. I've test-driven both my friend's Model 3 Performance and a demo dual-motor Model 3 Long Range Plus (the car now sold as just plain Long Range). In default settings, the Long Range Plus was the nicer car to drive, because the Performance's throttle was a hair trigger. The Long Range Plus was more than quick enough for any street driving situation. The Performance trim seems to me like a way to get bragging rights while making your car worse, unless you take it to a drag strip. Of course all this is even more extreme when you compare the regular and Plaid versions of the Model S.

    • See 3 previous
    • Dal20402 Dal20402 on Jan 12, 2022

      @FreedMike Part of the reason I sold my G8 GXP—which is slower at legal speeds than even a non-Performance/Plaid Tesla—was that I never had an opportunity to exercise it, so I was just living with an unrefined interior and crap fuel economy for little benefit.

  • Kcflyer Kcflyer on Jan 12, 2022

    the reviews I watched of the Plaid all said it was badly under braked. Hopefully this is being addressed.

    • See 3 previous
    • Kcflyer Kcflyer on Jan 12, 2022

      @MrIcky The guys definitely seemed worried by those brakes on such an incredibly fast and heavy car.

  • FormerFF 2025 is not shaping up to be a good year for the Save the Manuals folks.
  • Arthur Dailey $42k USD??????? For a Camry? What is the world coming to? This vehicle still has a front end/air dam/lack of road clearance that would make it too difficult to drive in heavy snow conditions. It certainly won't be going off road. So what is the AWD for? If a buyer insists on an AWD Toyota, I would suggest a Corolla Cross instead of this.
  • Slavuta "U.S. government has so far had a heavy hand in its efforts to improve data privacy and security." -- let me translate this one: effort to ensure that only US gov can take personal data
  • Slavuta Let me translate: When we win, capitalism is great, lets open all the markets. When we lose - close markets immediately, subsidize us. In other words, give us corporate socialism.
  • Guy 90's name, does Cavalier count it was around before,during and after the 90's. A Corsica SUV with a Beretta SUV "coupe" counterpart? On the aside if they keep the Durango name they have to keep it in Detroit per the UAW. Change the name and its not a next gen Durango anymore.
Next