Why Did Honda Pair With GM on EVs?
Last month, we wrote up the news that Honda will be working on a battery-electric vehicle called the Prologue — not to be mixed up with the Prelude — and the company would work with General Motors, using GM’s Ultium battery packs.
Why would Honda, known especially for engine development, pair with GM?
To refresh your memory, the Prologue is a battery-electric vehicle set for launch in 2024, one of two that will be using GM’s Ultium battery pack and “ skateboard-style” platform. The other BEV will be an Acura.
Honda says that partnering with GM will help it shift to EVs sooner than it could on its own.
“Leveraging strategic partners to achieve scale and mitigate initial investment requirements” would help Honda get an EV to market sooner than if it did it on its own, Dave Gardner, American Honda’s executive vice president of national operations, said during a media background briefing earlier this year. “Our zero-emission focus has begun.”
That’s not too far off what Chris Martin, a PR spokesperson for Honda, told us.
“Honda and General Motors have a long history of cooperative agreements including powertrain sharing, fuel cell joint ventures and common investment in Cruise, the automated vehicle startup,” Martin said. “Thus, as we evaluated potential strategic relationships for North America, those past and existing relationships along with our evaluation of Ultium technology led us to agree to co-develop these two BEVs for the North American market. This partnership will help unlock economies of scale for both companies and accelerate Honda’s electrification roadmap in North America with our first volume BEVs.”
Translation: Ultium will help Honda get the two vehicles to market sooner and at a lower development cost.
Still, I had to ask why Honda would partner with anyone at all, given its past successes in developing powertrains — and its past efforts when it comes to electrification (Insight, Clarity). Partnering has its advantages, sure, but Honda’s past would suggest it doesn’t need to pair up.
“You may recall in April 2021, our global CEO, [Toshihiro] Mibe-san announced key targets for sales of electrified vehicles in North America, with a plan to make battery-electric and fuel cell electric vehicles to represent 100 percent of its vehicle sales by 2040, progressing from sales of 40 percent by 2030 and 80 percent by 2035,” Martin said. “In addition to reiterating the co-development of two vehicles with GM, Honda also announced plans to launch a series of new EV models based on a new e:Architecture, with development led by Honda, beginning from the second half of the decade. So, you will see Honda-developed electric vehicles as part of our lineup in the latter half of this decade.”
Cutting through the PR speak once again: “We’re partnering now in order to get a couple of BEVs to market quickly and at a low cost, but we also have plans to develop models without pairing up. It will just take longer for them to reach market.”
Honda is targeting 100 percent EV sales by 2040.
I also asked if Honda had other plans for pairing up with GM or other automakers, and got a version of the “we don’t talk about future products” that every journalist covering this industry is familiar with. In this case, Martin said Honda was open to partnerships but would not speculate further about possible pairings.
So that’s the story, straight from the automaker’s mouth, so to speak — it’s not that Honda believes itself incapable of building an EV in-house, but it can save some money and time by working with GM. It also allows Honda to move cautiously when it comes to EV development — if the market continues to be slow to adopt BEVs, Honda won’t be on the hook for the entire cost burden.
We wouldn’t be shocked to see more of these partnerships come about as some automakers find it better to partner with those who are a bit further ahead on EV development than to be completely on the hook for the full development costs of cars that the market may initially shun.
[Image: Honda]
Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.
More by Tim Healey
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- Tassos Ask me if I care for the idiotic vehicles less than 10% of whose owners use as INTENDED.
- Brandon The 2024 Mercedes-Benz E 350 4Matic looks like a compelling addition to the luxury sedan market. From the drive notes, it’s clear that Mercedes-Benz has maintained its commitment to blending performance with comfort. The handling and acceleration seem impressive, reflecting Mercedes’ signature blend of power and smoothness.
- Jmanb52 In this case clearly a driver responsbile for the accident. Lawyer just trying to add confusion to jude and or jury to think about it. I was on a jury once for an auto accident and one of the attorneys tried a few stunts to shift blame. Same thing is happening here. The companies pushing autonamous want to deal with fleet markets like the autonamous taxi companies rather than individual consumers. In my opinion I think they belvie that would be more predictable sales. Car gets to xyz milage time to replace. In my opinion they could never sell a full autonamous car to an individual because of a back and forth legal battles between owner and maker when there is a crash. They need to foget about all these take over driver aids. It is just causing more issues than it could prevent.
- Jmanb52 Short answer is NO! It has been a tread for manufactures to basicaly glue a tablet to an area of the dash and call it an infotament system. However there is not one of us on here that doesn't ahve a smart phone or tablet. With the android auto, and the Apple Carplay and bluetooth that conencts car spekers and mic to our headset, do we even need an Infotament system or just bluetooth connection to use hands free mic and spearkers or wired connection to USB port for connection to spearkers / mic and charge the phone. So maybe the QOTD should be do manufactures even need to provide an infotanement system or should they just provide an in dash holder for a tablet or smartphone?
- Jmanb52 In the past year I did some more research on EVs. I already knew for years they were heavier than a ICE car of the same model / class. Like the F150 lightning can be 1000 LBS heavier than its ICE counterpart. In the last year I read more on the size of breaks, tires and other items that take more resrouces to create and polute more in their wear. This was another nail in my corporate EV caufin. I already didn't have much care for them due to my height (over 6 feet) and they all have a bad desgin, over dependency on gimics, over computerized driving experience. If I ever did get one it would be a low range in town only type vehicle that I would convert an older car. There is no manufacture making EVs that is worth a penny of my money.
Comments
Join the conversation
EV development is very expensive!! Better to pad your bets taping a competitor’s technology than putting all your eggs in one basket.
Contour/mystique: if you can get 4banger zetec w manual trans great car. Reliable, good handling n great simple interior layout.