Hot Tip: Chevrolet Addresses Bolt EV Fires, Readies Recall

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Chevrolet has issued a statement to owners of Bolt EVs that could be subject to surprise fires while charging, offering more tips on how to avoid burning down their homes while it preps another recall. General Motors and supplier LG Chem have identified “two rare manufacturing defects” that they believe are causing the fires and are suggesting avoid charging their vehicles in an extremely specific manner until after the secondary recall has been conducted.

While the initial recall just involved a software update, which often feels more like a way for automakers to buy time than a real solution, the new one will actually replace some hardware. Chevrolet is still recommending customers take their vehicles in for diagnostics and the original software fix. But it also plans on replacing defective battery modules and recommending actions to minimize the fire risk posed by Chevy Bolts from the 2017-2019 model years.

Parking your vehicle outdoors and away from other flammable objects remains sound advice. We would also suggest not storing anything of value inside the car while charging and watching that thing like a paranoid hawk until after a mechanical fix has been completed. However, Chevrolet had some additional, highly specific ways of reducing the likelihood of being the person in your neighborhood whose EV exploded.

If you own a 2019 Chevrolet Bolt, GM is recommending using the Target Charge Level mode and not surpassing 90 percent of the vehicle’s maximum charging limitations. While that’s likewise true for the other impacted models, it manufacturer suggests using Hilltop Reserve mode. Both settings are designed to keep vehicles from overcharging when you don’t need to and ultimately extend the life of the battery. But I bet nobody anticipated using them for this.

But here’s the kicker. In addition to never charging the vehicle past 90 percent, Chevrolet would also like customers to ensure Bolt batteries aren’t depleted below 70 miles of remaining range and attempt to recharge the EV after every use. It sounds like GM wants to keep these cars from spending any more time plugged in than absolutely necessary. Some EV batteries, especially those furnished by LG Chem, have been suspected of coming undone while charging for a few years now and this ( along with the Hyundai Kona EV recall) has really pushed the matter in front of the public.

While pretty much every lithium-ion battery is capable of hazardous thermal runaway when overcharged or overheated, they’re supposed to possess fail-safe circuitry that shuts everything down when the voltage is out of whack. But these systems are useless if manufactured or designed incorrectly, occasionally resulting in extremely difficult to stop and sometimes explosive vehicle fires. We’re not exactly sure of what went wrong with the Bolt, though the circumstances seem highly similar to the uptick in charging-related fires we’ve seen over the last few years.

Fortunately, EVs aren’t supposed to catch fire with a frequency greater than internal combustion cars. But the brunt of the supportive data comes from outlets hoping to sell you an electric car, making some claims suspect. For example, Tesla has asserted that gasoline-powered cars are about 11 times more likely to catch fire than one of its models. There might be some truth to that, specifically when Tesla fires seem to be preceded by high-speed crashes that could turn any automobile to ashes. But we doubt other manufacturers are willing to make similar claims and there have been some studies that undermine the premise that EVs are less fire-prone.

In 2012, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) accidentally burned up a Chevrolet Volt during crash testing. It then ordered a trio of batteries to wail on, getting two of the three to catch fire. While this seemed damning, there’s not much to compare it against. The NHTSA typically preps gasoline-powered models without fuel during crash assessments and focuses on things like how flammable the interior materials are in smaller-scale tests. Frankly, we need more comprehensive research before anything can be proven. Electric and hybrid cars are still relatively new and there’s not been enough time spent examining the long-term implications of battery charging or how much abuse they can take before thermal runaway becomes an issue.

[Image: General Motors]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 16 comments
  • Mcs Mcs on Jul 24, 2021

    @MattPosky: Great article!

  • Akear Akear on Jul 24, 2021

    This is yet another reason not to buy the Bolt. Then again not many people are buying them anyway.

  • CaddyDaddy Start with a good vehicle (avoid anything FCA / European and most GM, they are all Junk). Buy from a private party which allows you to know the former owner. Have the vehicle checked out by a reputable mechanic. Go into the situation with the upper hand of the trade in value of the car. Have the ability to pay on the spot or at you bank immediately with cash or ability to draw on a loan. Millions of cars are out there, the one you are looking at is not a limited commodity. Dealers are a government protected monopoly that only add an unnecessary cost to those too intellectually lazy to do research for a good used car.
  • Redapple2 I gave up on Honda. My 09 Accord Vs my 03. The 09s- V 6 had a slight shudder when deactivating cylinders. And the 09 did not have the 03 's electro luminescent gages. And the 09 had the most uncomfortable seats. My brother bought his 3rd and last Honda CRV. Brutal seats after 25 minutes. NOW, We are forever Toyota, Lexus, Subaru people now despite HAVING ACCESS TO gm EMPLOYEE DISCOUNT. Despite having access to the gm employee discount. Man, that is a massive statement. Wow that s bad - Under no circumstances will I have that govna crap.
  • Redapple2 Front tag obscured. Rear tag - clear and sharp. Huh?
  • Redapple2 I can state what NOT to buy. HK. High theft. Insurance. Unrefined NVH. Rapidly degrading interiors. HK? No way !
  • Luke42 Serious answer:Now that I DD an EV, buying an EV to replace my wife’s Honda Civic is in the queue. My wife likes her Honda, she likes Apple CarPlay, and she can’t stand Elon Musk - so Tesla starts the competition with two demerit-points and Honda starts the competition with one merit-point.The Honda Prologue looked like a great candidate until Honda announced that the partnership with GM was a one-off thing and that their future EVs would be designed in-house.Now I’m more inclined toward the Blazer EV, the vehicle on which the Prologue is based. The Blazer EV and the Ultium platform won’t be orphaned by GM any time soon. But then I have to convince my wife she would like it better than her Honda Civic, and that’s a heavy lift because she doesn’t have any reason to be dissatisfied with her current car (I take care of all of the ICE-hassles for her).Since my wife’s Honda Civic is holding up well, since she likes the car, and since I take care of most of the drawbacks of drawbacks of ICE ownership for her, there’s no urgency to replace this vehicle.Honestly, if a paid-off Honda Civic is my wife’s automotive hill to die on, that’s a pretty good place to be - even though I personally have to continue dealing the hassles and expenses of ICE ownership on her behalf.My plan is simply to wait-and-see what Honda does next. Maybe they’ll introduce the perfect EV for her one day, and I’ll just go buy it.
Next