Refreshed 2022 Hyundai Kona Adds Length, Power, N Line

Tim Healey
by Tim Healey

Another day, another Zoom presentation to learn about some new hotness.

Today it’s the 2022 Hyundai Kona, which we teased last year, with a side of Santa Fe.

As we noted, the Kona now gets an N Line trim so that the brand can argue that its subcompact crossover can be considered truly “sporty” (we’ll be the judge of the merits of said argument once we drive it), and there are new duds.

Other changes include what Hyundai classifies as improvements in performance, efficiency, handling, and connectivity.

Styling-wise, the Kona gets a new grille without changing the look of the headlights, and the crossover also gains 1.6 inches in length. There are new air inlets that are meant to improve airflow integrated into the corners of the front bumper. New taillights and a new rear fascia adorn the Kona’s backside, and there are new wheel designs.

Electric Konas get a new front fascia, new headlight and DRL design, and sculpted fender vents along with a new rear fascia and new wheel designs that are meant to increase airflow. The Kona EV gets new taillamps, as well.

Interior updates include USB ports for the rear seat, improved cargo room, more second-row legroom, and a console that is no longer connected to the instrument panel. The gauge cluster is now digital. For EV models, the center-stack and center-cluster display screens are now both 10.25 inches and a new center-console design allows for wireless charging of phones.

Then there’s the N Line. N Line models will be distinguished from their counterparts by different front- and rear-end designs, body-color cladding, dual-exhaust tips, and a unique to N Line 18-inch wheel design. Inside, N Lines will be known by their black seats with red stitching, black headliner, metal pedals, and N logos.

Engine choices remain a 2.0-liter four-cylinder making 147 horsepower and 132 lb-ft of torque and a 1.6-liter turbocharged four-cylinder. The latter gains 20 horsepower, up to 195, and still puts out 195 lb-ft of torque. The 2.0-liter now gets the “intelligent variable” transmission, with 1.6 remains paired with a seven-speed, dual-clutch automatic that Hyundai says is retuned. The 1.6 will be the mill for Limited and N Line trims.

Meanwhile, Kona EVs are powered by a 150 kW/201-horsepower permanent magnet synchronous electric motor that gets its juice from a 64 kWh lithium-ion battery that’s liquid-cooled and runs at 356 volts. Torque output is 291 lb-ft and the estimated MPGe is 132 city, 108 highway, and 120 combined.

Standard is an onboard level II charging system, with up to a 7.2 kW rate of charge. Range is estimated at 258 miles. If the driver locates a level III fast charger, the Kona EV can get from 10 to 80 percent charge in about 47 minutes. It can also go from 10 percent to 100 percent on level II in nine hours and 15 minutes, and upper trims will offer a battery warmer.

Just like the EV, the gas-powered Kona gets 10.25-inch screens for the digital gauge cluster and infotainment system. A whole slew of features can be controlled via voice recognition and wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are available, as is the use of one’s phone as a key.

The by-now-familiar driver-assist systems are available, with new or notable ones including a highway-driving assist system that helps with lane centering and vehicle spacing, along with adjusting the speed based on the limit. A system that helps avoid collisions with bicyclists and rear-cross-traffic collision-avoidance assist are new, as well.

Hyundai’s Blue Link telematics system remains available, as well, with some new features. It can help monitor the status of EV models.

As for the Santa Fe, our last writeup lacked some specs that Hyundai has since unveiled, the most important being new engines – either a 2.5-liter naturally aspirated four or a 2.5-liter turbo-four. Both mate to eight-speed automatics, though the latter pairs with a dual-clutch. There will also be a hybrid powertrain pairing a 1.6-liter turbocharged four-cylinder with an electric motor. That one will use a six-speed automatic and have all-wheel drive standard.

A plug-in hybrid is planned.

[Images: Hyundai]

Tim Healey
Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 17 comments
  • W Conrad I'm not afraid of them, but they aren't needed for everyone or everywhere. Long haul and highway driving sure, but in the city, nope.
  • Jalop1991 In a manner similar to PHEV being the correct answer, I declare RPVs to be the correct answer here.We're doing it with certain aircraft; why not with cars on the ground, using hardware and tools like Telsa's "FSD" or GM's "SuperCruise" as the base?Take the local Uber driver out of the car, and put him in a professional centralized environment from where he drives me around. The system and the individual car can have awareness as well as gates, but he's responsible for the driving.Put the tech into my car, and let me buy it as needed. I need someone else to drive me home; hit the button and voila, I've hired a driver for the moment. I don't want to drive 11 hours to my vacation spot; hire the remote pilot for that. When I get there, I have my car and he's still at his normal location, piloting cars for other people.The system would allow for driver rest period, like what's required for truckers, so I might end up with multiple people driving me to the coast. I don't care. And they don't have to be physically with me, therefore they can be way cheaper.Charge taxi-type per-mile rates. For long drives, offer per-trip rates. Offer subscriptions, including miles/hours. Whatever.(And for grins, dress the remote pilots all as Johnnie.)Start this out with big rigs. Take the trucker away from the long haul driving, and let him be there for emergencies and the short haul parts of the trip.And in a manner similar to PHEVs being discredited, I fully expect to be razzed for this brilliant idea (not unlike how Alan Kay wasn't recognized until many many years later for his Dynabook vision).
  • B-BodyBuick84 Not afraid of AV's as I highly doubt they will ever be %100 viable for our roads. Stop-and-go downtown city or rush hour highway traffic? I can see that, but otherwise there's simply too many variables. Bad weather conditions, faded road lines or markings, reflective surfaces with glare, etc. There's also the issue of cultural norms. About a decade ago there was actually an online test called 'The Morality Machine' one could do online where you were in control of an AV and choose what action to take when a crash was inevitable. I think something like 2.5 million people across the world participated? For example, do you hit and most likely kill the elderly couple strolling across the crosswalk or crash the vehicle into a cement barrier and almost certainly cause the death of the vehicle occupants? What if it's a parent and child? In N. America 98% of people choose to hit the elderly couple and save themselves while in Asia, the exact opposite happened where 98% choose to hit the parent and child. Why? Cultural differences. Asia puts a lot of emphasis on respecting their elderly while N. America has a culture of 'save/ protect the children'. Are these AV's going to respect that culture? Is a VW Jetta or Buick Envision AV going to have different programming depending on whether it's sold in Canada or Taiwan? how's that going to effect legislation and legal battles when a crash inevitibly does happen? These are the true barriers to mass AV adoption, and in the 10 years since that test came out, there has been zero answers or progress on this matter. So no, I'm not afraid of AV's simply because with the exception of a few specific situations, most avenues are going to prove to be a dead-end for automakers.
  • Mike Bradley Autonomous cars were developed in Silicon Valley. For new products there, the standard business plan is to put a barely-functioning product on the market right away and wait for the early-adopter customers to find the flaws. That's exactly what's happened. Detroit's plan is pretty much the opposite, but Detroit isn't developing this product. That's why dealers, for instance, haven't been trained in the cars.
  • Dartman https://apnews.com/article/artificial-intelligence-fighter-jets-air-force-6a1100c96a73ca9b7f41cbd6a2753fdaAutonomous/Ai is here now. The question is implementation and acceptance.
Next