European Auto Lobby Demands More EV Charging Stations for Hundredth Time

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky
european auto lobby demands more ev charging stations for hundredth time

The European Automobile Manufacturers’ Association (ACEA) is demanding the EU install more electric vehicle charging stations in a letter co-signed with Transport & Environment (T&E) and the European Consumer Organization (BEUC). This marks the hundredth time (rough estimate) an auto lobbying entity has tried to pressure the government into spending a fortune to drastically alter the European infrastructure to support the planned glut of EVs.

But it might be a fair request. Regulatory actions have effectively forced the industry into a corner and it now seems giddy at the prospect of an electrified world. The only real downside is that the charging infrastructure and power grids aren’t ready. ACEA estimates that the EU will need to build one million public charging points by 2024, with hopes of seeing three million installed before 2030.

Let’s see how feasible that is before it’s tried in our neck of the woods.

Automakers are convinced they’ll need a robust grid to mainstream EVs inside of Europe and have been working on supplying charging networks of their own. But the latest counts have the total number of public charging stations inside of the EU just shy of 250,000 units. Completing another 750,000 in four years would be a monumental undertaking, though allegedly worth it from the perspective of the ACEA. The group claimed that setting lofty targets would result in the creation of countless construction jobs and allow the European Union to adhere to its climate goals.

“European automakers are driving the transition to e-mobility and are literally outperforming each other in launching new electric vehicles. But the success of this huge effort is seriously threatened by the delayed installation of charging infrastructure in the EU,” wrote ACEA President and BMW CEO Oliver Zipse. “The EU Commission quickly needs to take action and set binding targets for the ramp-up of charging infrastructure in the member states. Otherwise, even the current reduction targets in fighting climate change are at risk. In addition to public charging infrastructure, we also need to put a stronger focus on workplace and home charging.”

Unwilling to risk a scenario where most people continue to prefer liquid-fueled alternatives, the ACEA (which represents the largest automakers operating in Europe) really wants the EU to solidify its commitments here while also chucking on a few hydrogen stations for good measure. It’s also undoubtedly hoping that it will also foot a sizable portion of the bill.

Fortunately for them, practically all member states have issued some kind of promise toward installing more stations or further subsidizing the assembly and sale of EVs. For example, German has vowed to have a million charging points within its borders by 2030, plans to spend $4.8 billion on home charging solutions, and doubled incentives for electric cars over the summer. But it’s not abundantly clear that its electrical grid could handle an EV dominant landscape in the current format.

Energy prices have gotten brutally high in Germany ever since it started trying to tamp down coal and nuclear power for greener, albeit less reliable sources, like wind and solar. All manner of remedies have been proposed, including a few that had to be recalled. Last month, Germany’s Economics Minister Peter Altmaier presented a draft law that would allow electric utilities to temporarily suspend power for charging electric cars “when there is once again too little electricity available.”

As you might imagine, cutting off people’s electricity wasn’t an incredibly popular idea. Despite being just one example of the trouble the EU will have to contend with, it showcases the general issue in advancing these types of policies. It’s hard to give consumers what they want and still adhere to the kind of social engineering necessary for a carbon-neutral lifestyle. But people aren’t going to rush out and buy EVs if there’s no way of charging them — whether that’s due to a lack of charging points or because the electric company might randomly shut down the tap.

[Image: nrqemi/Shutterstock]

Join the conversation
3 of 18 comments
  • Redgolf Redgolf on Feb 12, 2021

    "I’m doing so little driving right now (working from home) that I can’t justify purchasing any car at this time" I hear you, I'm on a 10K mile/year lease, month 14 with only 7K miles driven, at this rate I will have under 20K miles by lease end, I will be forced to buy it out right or someone will get a great low mileage deal when turned in! I do want an EV though.

  • Gasser Gasser on Feb 12, 2021

    I live in Los Angeles now, and have lived in NYC. MOST people there live in apartments and there are definitely not enough, if ANY, assigned parking for each car. People spend hours looking for a spot, and when they find one they are loathe to move. Also, on any given day, there are lines at regular gas stations for fuel. Now add to this: long charging times. What happens now? I just can’t see a solution to millions of cars needing electric charging and no place to charge. As it is, people park at charging spots LONG after they are charged, just because they are busy or there are no other spots open. All of these issues clump together, but I just don’t see how there is a solution with current technology.

    • Master Baiter Master Baiter on Feb 12, 2021

      I tend to agree. The best governments and the environmental zealots who are pushing EVs should hope for is some limited penetration, like 20-30% of EVs relative to ICE vehicles over the next 30 years or so.

  • Art Vandelay Best? PCH from Ventura to somewhere near Lompoc. Most Famous? Route Irish
  • GT Ross The black wheel fad cannot die soon enough for me.
  • Brett Woods My 4-Runner had a manual with the 4-cylinder. It was acceptable but not really fun. I have thought before that auto with a six cylinder would have been smoother, more comfortable, and need less maintenance. Ditto my 4 banger manual Japanese pick-up. Nowhere near as nice as a GM with auto and six cylinders that I tried a bit later. Drove with a U.S. buddy who got one of the first C8s. He said he didn't even consider a manual. There was an article about how fewer than ten percent of buyers optioned a manual in the U.S. when they were available. Visited my English cousin who lived in a hilly suburb and she had a manual Range Rover and said she never even considered an automatic. That's culture for you.  Miata, Boxster, Mustang, Corvette and Camaro; I only want manual but I can see both sides of the argument for a Mustang, Camaro or Challenger. Once you get past a certain size and weight, cruising with automatic is a better dynamic. A dual clutch automatic is smoother, faster, probably more reliable, and still allows you to select and hold a gear. When you get these vehicles with a high performance envelope, dual-clutch automatic is what brings home the numbers. 
  • ToolGuy 2019 had better comments than 2023 😉
  • Inside Looking Out In June 1973, Leonid Brezhnev arrived in Washington for his second summit meeting with President Richard Nixon. Knowing of the Soviet leader’s fondness for luxury automobiles, Nixon gave him a shiny Lincoln Continental. Brezhnev was delighted with the present and insisted on taking a spin around Camp David, speeding through turns while the president nervously asked him to slow down.