Rare Rides: A Pristine 1996 Oldsmobile LSS Guarantees Sports Luxury Enjoyment

Corey Lewis
by Corey Lewis

An oft-overlooked offering in Oldsmobile’s product catalog, the LSS was available for a few short years as the Rocket brand headed toward closure. Comfort and sporty driving appeal awaited its customers then, and still awaits you today.

Come along as we learn about this very beige supercharged sedan.

The Oldsmobile Eighty Eight entered its 10th and final generation for the 1992 model year, and was the more affordable (and slightly smaller) full-size alternative to the Ninety Eight flagship. In 1992 Oldsmobile also offered one final year of a traditional large car, the rear-drive Custom Cruiser wagon.

Eighty Eight was one of the last Oldsmobile products to adopt a more aerodynamic corporate styling theme. Though it looked very different to the outgoing model, it remained on the H-body platform it used since 1986. In modern Nineties fashion, the only body style was a sedan; the coupe faded away in 1991. All Eighty Eights were powered by the potent Buick 3800 V6,with four different versions used throughout production. Two naturally aspirated engines, the L27 and L36, filled some engine bays, while others used the Series I and Series II supercharged L67 engine. Likewise, all transmissions were four-speed automatics, but three different versions of the 4T60 were used depending on specification.

A year of change occurred with Eighty Eight for 1996, as the model range expanded in trims. At introduction only the Royale was available, and LSS stood as an add-on package. In ’96 Royale vanished, replaced with the base Eighty Eight, the Eighty Eight LS, and the LSS, or Luxury Sports Sedan (brochure here).

With the introduction of the flagship Aurora in 1995, Oldsmobile had two “sporty” sedans on offer for 1996: Aurora and LSS. The gawky Ninety Eight Touring vanished after 1994, and the model itself was finished in 1996. Traditional Ninety Eight buyers were offered a carrot by Oldsmobile (more detail on that in a moment).

Because the Aurora already existed, it donated some of its parts and ideas to the LSS. The LSS had Aurora wheels, and its seat design was also inspired by Aurora. Fitting its upscale mission, the LSS had fog lamps, a console shifter, and offered electronic climate control. It also used the supercharged 3800, where prior to 1996 it was still an optional extra on the Royale with LSS package. GPS was also available in the vaporware Guidestar system.

1996 was the last year of the traditional Rocket logo for Oldsmobile products, as in ’97 all adopted the modern logo — except one. As a consolation offering to would-be Ninety Eight buyers in 1997, the Regency trim appeared on the Eighty Eight. With lots of standard power features and leather seats, it used the front fenders, traditional looking front clip, and Rocket logo from the old Ninety Eight. This trim was fazed out after the ’98 model year. The Eighty Eight and LSS continued on through 1999 alongside the Aurora. For 2000 Oldsmobile had no large sedans at all, as the second-gen Aurora did not arrive until model year 2001. And you know the rest.

Today’s Rare Ride is for sale at a small dealer in the casket town of Batesville, Indiana. In pristine condition, it’s priced at an optimistic $6,900.

[Images: seller]

Corey Lewis
Corey Lewis

Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Started writing articles for TTAC in late 2016, when my first posts were QOTDs. From there I started a few new series like Rare Rides, Buy/Drive/Burn, Abandoned History, and most recently Rare Rides Icons. Operating from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio, a relative auto journalist dead zone. Many of my articles are prompted by something I'll see on social media that sparks my interest and causes me to research. Finding articles and information from the early days of the internet and beyond that covers the little details lost to time: trim packages, color and wheel choices, interior fabrics. Beyond those, I'm fascinated by automotive industry experiments, both failures and successes. Lately I've taken an interest in AI, and generating "what if" type images for car models long dead. Reincarnating a modern Toyota Paseo, Lincoln Mark IX, or Isuzu Trooper through a text prompt is fun. Fun to post them on Twitter too, and watch people overreact. To that end, the social media I use most is Twitter, @CoreyLewis86. I also contribute pieces for Forbes Wheels and Forbes Home.

More by Corey Lewis

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 42 comments
  • ToolGuy ToolGuy on Sep 04, 2020

    Engine bay picture: I like the accessibility of those coils, and the serpentine belt. I seem to be replacing (proactively) a lot of serpentine belts/tensioners/pulleys lately. [The 'kits' from Gates which include the belt and the tensioner and the idler pulley are excellent.] Clearance on some vehicles is... a lot worse than pictured here. Hop over to Amazon and get yourself a "Ratcheting Serpentine Belt Tool" (like the Lisle 59000) if you are even thinking about replacing a belt/tensioner/pulley where the clearance is tight.

  • Gearhead77 Gearhead77 on Sep 08, 2020

    I drove a number of these (non-LSS) 88's and their GM platform mates working for Enterprise in the day. The Olds had the cleanest styling inside and out and was between the Pontiac and the Buick for ride/handling. I didn't mind driving an Olds compared to the more floaty Lesabre.

  • Dave Holzman My '08 Civic (stick, 159k on the clock) is my favorite car that I've ever owned. If I had to choose between the current Civic and Corolla, I'd test drive 'em (with stick), and see how they felt. But I'd be approaching this choice partial to the Civic. I would not want any sort of automatic transmission, or the turbo engine.
  • Merc190 I would say Civic Si all the way if it still revved to 8300 rpm with no turbo. But nowadays I would pick the Corolla because I think they have a more clear idea on their respective models identity and mission. I also believe Toyota has a higher standard for quality.
  • Dave Holzman I think we're mixing up a few things here. I won't swear to it, but I'd be damned surprised if they were putting fire retardant in the seats of any cars from the '50s, or even the '60s. I can't quite conjure up the new car smell of the '57 Chevy my parents bought on October 17th of that year... but I could do so--vividly--until the last five years or so. I loved that scent, and when I smelled it, I could see the snow on Hollis Street in Cambridge Mass, as one or the other parent got ready to drive me to nursery school, and I could remember staring up at the sky on Christmas Eve, 1957, wondering if I might see Santa Claus flying overhead in his sleigh. No, I don't think the fire retardant on the foam in the seats of 21st (and maybe late 20th) century cars has anything to do with new car smell. (That doesn't mean new car small lacked toxicity--it probably had some.)
  • ToolGuy Is this a website or a podcast with homework? You want me to answer the QOTD before I listen to the podcast? Last time I worked on one of our vehicles (2010 RAV4 2.5L L4) was this past week -- replaced the right front passenger window regulator (only problem turned out to be two loose screws, but went ahead and installed the new part), replaced a bulb in the dash, finally ordered new upper dash finishers (non-OEM) because I cracked one of them ~2 years ago.Looked at the mileage (157K) and scratched my head and proactively ordered plugs, coils, PCV valve, air filter and a spare oil filter, plus a new oil filter housing (for the weirdo cartridge-type filter). Those might go in tomorrow. Is this interesting to you? It ain't that interesting to me. 😉The more intriguing part to me, is I have noticed some 'blowby' (but is it) when the oil filler cap is removed which I don't think was there before. But of course I'm old and forgetful. Is it worth doing a compression test? Leakdown test? Perhaps if a guy were already replacing the plugs...
  • Crown No surprise there. The toxic chemical stew of outgassing.
Next