Tesla's 'Self-driving' Suite Grows More Expensive, Subscription Model Likely

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

On Monday, Tesla CEO Elon Musk announced that his company’s full self-driving (FSD) suite stands to become more expensive starting in July. Intended to serve as the prerequisite hardware for truly autonomous functionality once the software is ready, it’s proven a pricey way to get into brand’s more advance driver assistance features. Of course, the company sells it as a way to buy into complete vehicular autonomy — something that has yet to be realized anywhere in the industry — and has so far failed to deliver on that front.

Luckily for Tesla, the company remains on the bleeding edge of available automotive technologies while continuing to improve the basic fit and finish of its products. As no one else is delivering self-driving vehicles, the Californian EV manufacturer can get away with making certain claims about FSD — like how it’s inching closer to figuring out how to navigate a car through an urban environment.

Musk actually signaled that new features would be coming to the suite earlier this year, noting incoming price increases through 2020. Starting July 1st, FSD becomes an $8,000 option (tacking on a grand to the current price) and may eventually become a subscription model.

If your ears just perked up, that’s probably because you’re not a fan of subscription models either. While they work wonderfully for podcasts and streaming services, automakers dabble with them as a way to make customers pay endlessly for features as vehicles shift into being perpetually connected to the internet. In April, Teslarati chronicled a discussion with Musk and EV hacker/enthusiast Greentheonly after he had discovered Tesla’s source code now includes a subscription plan for FSD.

To its benefit, Tesla’s code suggests FSD subscriptions will be pay-as-you-go — allowing customers to pay for the privilege of enabling or disabling features on the fly. But it also raises questions about how older vehicles that already bought into FSD will be handled. Tesla has already proven itself capable and willing to remove enhanced Autopilot features and performance upgrades once cars enter the secondhand market. We also cannot say with any certainty that the next batch of updates will make the driving assistance suite more appetizing.

With Tesla hinting that legitimate self-driving will come by the end of this year, most watchers assume a major update is on the way to help legitimatize the price increase. Today, the $7,000 upgrade adds navigate on Autopilot, automatic lane change, auto park, a summon option, and traffic light and stop sign control. “Autosteer on city streets” is slated to arrive after the fee goes up.

[Image: JL IMAGES/Shutterstock]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 17 comments
  • Jkross22 Jkross22 on May 20, 2020

    Tesla is a reminder/warning of how dangerous cults can be. Musk's behavior and the company's attitude on FSD is reprehensible. GM ignition switch reprehensible.

  • Master Baiter Master Baiter on May 20, 2020

    I wouldn't be surprised if they required a subscription to open your glove box.

    • See 1 previous
    • ToolGuy ToolGuy on May 21, 2020

      Sat in a brand-new Cadillac inside the showroom several months ago - the glovebox is opened using a capacitive 'touch' switch. My mind reeled going through all the possible failure modes [through the seasons and various use cases and over time]. Also set off a piercing alarm (again, inside the showroom) when I opened the hood - I suppose that isn't done these days. [Can only imagine the scowl that Melody Lee would have shot in my general direction.] The glove compartment in my daily driver has a latch and a keyed lock. I like it even better now.

  • Calrson Fan Jeff - Agree with what you said. I think currently an EV pick-up could work in a commercial/fleet application. As someone on this site stated, w/current tech. battery vehicles just do not scale well. EBFlex - No one wanted to hate the Cyber Truck more than me but I can't ignore all the new technology and innovative thinking that went into it. There is a lot I like about it. GM, Ford & Ram should incorporate some it's design cues into their ICE trucks.
  • Michael S6 Very confusing if the move is permanent or temporary.
  • Jrhurren Worked in Detroit 18 years, live 20 minutes away. Ren Cen is a gem, but a very terrible design inside. I’m surprised GM stuck it out as long as they did there.
  • Carson D I thought that this was going to be a comparison of BFGoodrich's different truck tires.
  • Tassos Jong-iL North Korea is saving pokemon cards and amibos to buy GM in 10 years, we hope.
Next