By on May 22, 2020

Today’s Ferrari 400 took a more upscale approach than its contemporaries wearing the prancing horse badge. The engine was at the front instead of the middle, the seats numbered four instead of two, and the accommodations were more cocktail lounge than race car.

Let’s find out more about the vintage Ferrari many fans gloss over entirely.

To learn the history of the 400, one must start with the 365 GT4 2+2. Introduced in 1972, the new 365 GT4 was a modern replacement for the much more classically styled 365 GT 2+2. On sale since 1967, the older 365 was the company’s V12 -powered, four-place coupe offering. By the dawn of the Seventies its sweeping Pininfarina design found itself in need of replacement. So, Ferrari hired Pininfarina again… and everyone at the office picked up a ruler.

The formula of the new 365 stayed the same as before: V12 up front, four seats in the middle, and a good-sized grand touring trunk at the rear. Initially cars were offered with the 4.4-liter V12 from the prior 365. With Weber carbs, the engine promised 335 horses shifted through a five-speed manual.

Luxury came standard with the 365, as occupants nestled into leather recliners in the middle of an air conditioned room. Perhaps contrary to expectations, this high-line Ferrari was never officially brought to the American market. Enzo took one look at the changing regulatory environment and considered how those changes might translate into excessive fiddling with his most expensive model. Understandably, he passed.

The 365 GT4 remained in its initial form through 1976, when a lightly reworked model debuted with a new name. Reaching further into luxury territory, the new 400 arrived with more choice for the customer. Available in five-speed GT or new three-speed Automatic guises, the 400 carried a massaged and enlarged version of the engine from the 365, now with 4.8 liters displacement. According to Ferrari, the larger engine made no additional power.

Today, Ferrari seems a bit confused about what they were after with the 400. They say the 400 was the first Ferrari offered with an optional automatic to meet the demand of American customers. In the same blurb, they also state “…no USA market version was made.” Interesting.

The two 400s continued through 1979, at which point Bosch fuel injection was added (in keeping with the times). An i was appended to either model’s name, creating the GTi and Automatic i. Injection meant power dropped to 306 horses, a figure which improved to 311 in 1982 with revised camshafts and a new exhaust manifold. Accompanying the injection were revisions and modernization of the interior, all of which added around 300 pounds to the 400’s weight. Its heft reached 4,034 pounds when bone dry.

Ferrari updated the 400 once more in 1985, when a slightly larger displacement of 4.9 liters necessitated a name change to 412. The 412 continued through 1989 before its 17-year long tenure came to an end. The brand next offered a four-seat V12 in 1992, with the debut of the 456.

Today’s manual transmission 400 GTi hails from 1984. One of 422 examples produced, it asks $87,000.

[Images: seller]

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

17 Comments on “Rare Rides: The 1984 Ferrari 400 GTi – Luxurious Ruching for Four...”

  • avatar

    Love this car.

  • avatar

    I like it. It just has a “I’m listening to Italian jazz as drive at extra-legal speeds past vineyards” vibe to it.

    It seems like the four seater Ferraris don’t get the respect they deserve.

    • 0 avatar

      Maybe it’s the pop-up headlights that ruin the look of the car. They were limited at the time to round, sealed beam headlights, but the pop-ups were not a good look.

      • 0 avatar
        Arthur Dailey

        I agree with Richard Hammond, pop-up headlights always improve a car.

        So despite the reservations some have regarding this car, when new it cost less than an Aston-Martin Lagonda.

        And which would you rather have? Perhaps and idea for a Buy/Drive/Burn?

  • avatar
    cimarron typeR

    Beautiful car. Hey , it’s good enough for Tom Cruise to import grey market in “Rainman”

    Incidentally, I saw a beautiful blue in color 365 coupe in my brother in laws subdivision. It’s not exactly a millionaire’s suburb, but really nice. It turns out that it belonged to the private pilot of a successful businessman.He used to always mention to his boss how beautiful his Ferrari was . When said millionaire passed away he left it to this pilot.His kids were not thrilled but he was able to keep it. He told my bro in law the maintenance is ridiculous, but he loved the boss and the car too much to sell it.

  • avatar
    87 Morgan

    I love the look of this car, the photo of the engine gives me heartburn though.

    335 HP from a complicated v12? No thank you.

    This car screams for a junkyard LS swap. You would have the most reliable 80’s era Ferrari ever made.

    • 0 avatar

      You make it sound like Ferrari doesn’t know how to make reliable V12s. When this car was built, Ferrari had decades of experience making them.

    • 0 avatar

      That’s a horrible idea.

      Imagine taking a late 70s Corvette and swapping in a 2.0l turbocharged inline four.

      Now multiply that crime by a thousand.

      • 0 avatar

        I’ll be the contrarian – late 70s Vette C3 in some cases making only about 180 hp? Hmmmmmmmm modern 2.0T pumping out say 260 hp and roughly 300 lb ft of torque.

        Yes please. Situate the engine in the chassis so that you get 50/50 weight distribution and you’d probably have a canyon carving monster.

  • avatar

    Nah, I like Cadillac Eldorado Brom betta.

  • avatar

    I love a lot of older Ferraris, but no matter how much money I had, I feel like the school bus steering wheel angles would keep me away. Why? Whyyyy??

  • avatar

    The Bitter SC managed to copy the styling and was even very briefly officially offered for sale in the U.S. The SC was based on the Opel Senator and used the Opel inline 6. It was was a decent car, but no Ferrari V12.

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • JRED: Better yet, deploy once the tempo speeds past a certain point
  • 28-Cars-Later: *faint
  • Corey Lewis: The excessive holdout was the gawky D-body Imperial!
  • 28-Cars-Later: Well at least it got a fair amount of use and wasn’t wasted.
  • 28-Cars-Later: Damning with feint praise right there.

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber