Rare Rides: The 1969 De Tomaso Mangusta - Building a Brand

Corey Lewis
by Corey Lewis

Rare Rides has covered a few De Tomaso vehicles in past, but today’s Italian classic predates all those presented thus far. From 1970, it’s the second car ever offered by its parent brand, and the first model which was produced in a mass quantity of over 100 vehicles.

Let’s learn about the Mangusta.

The Mangusta was successor to De Tomaso’s very limited production introductory model, the Vallelunga. Produced from 1964 to 1968, just 53 examples exited the factory in Turin. Part of the reason so few cars were produced was that De Tomaso didn’t want to make his own cars. After the Vallelunga was designed by Fissore, De Tomaso planned to sell it on to a third party for production. However, nobody took the bait, so he farmed out production to Ghia instead. And a new car brand was formed.

De Tomaso’s second product entry was a bit more intentional. Given the company’s ongoing relationship, De Tomaso hired Ghia to design the Mangusta. Penning its shape was the legendary Giorgetto Giugiaro. The new car was a long time in development, as a completed prototype was shown in 1965 at the Turin Motor Show and displayed as the Sport 5000. De Tomaso was so interested in Ghia and its work that he purchased the company in 1967; right around the time the Mangusta entered production. Surely the move was an economical one, ending the contract work between the two firms.

As might be expected, the donor chassis for the Mangusta came from the Vallelunga. The steel platform saw extensive reinforcements , as the Mangusta was larger, heavier, and much more powerful than its predecessor. The production Mangusta was a unique design amongst its competitors, given it featured very unusual gullwing doors for the hood. The rest of the body’s design was more typical of a Seventies Italian super car.

Power was familiar enough: European examples used Ford’s HiPo 289 (4.7L) V8, while American ones suffered with a larger 302 (4.9L) engine from the Mustang. The difference in power was considerable, as Europeans had 306 horses underfoot while Americans made do with 230. Unfortunately, later versions for all nations employed the 302.

In use as a car, the Mangusta was a pretty flawed ride. Its weight distribution was poor, 32/68 front/rear, which made for some interesting handling. The unbalanced weight combined with a compromised chassis. Though De Tomaso reworked the chassis for Mangusta use, nothing could hide its original lightweight sports car intentions (the Mangusta weighed a whopping 1,300 pounds more than the Vallelunga).

Still, Mangusta stayed in production through 1971, and a full 401 examples made their way out of Turin. By then, De Tomaso was ready with a prime time successor. It was the coupe the company is now known for: Pantera.

Today’s Rare Ride is glorious in metallic light green. For sale in Germany, it asks $354,000.

[Images: seller]

Corey Lewis
Corey Lewis

Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Started writing articles for TTAC in late 2016, when my first posts were QOTDs. From there I started a few new series like Rare Rides, Buy/Drive/Burn, Abandoned History, and most recently Rare Rides Icons. Operating from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio, a relative auto journalist dead zone. Many of my articles are prompted by something I'll see on social media that sparks my interest and causes me to research. Finding articles and information from the early days of the internet and beyond that covers the little details lost to time: trim packages, color and wheel choices, interior fabrics. Beyond those, I'm fascinated by automotive industry experiments, both failures and successes. Lately I've taken an interest in AI, and generating "what if" type images for car models long dead. Reincarnating a modern Toyota Paseo, Lincoln Mark IX, or Isuzu Trooper through a text prompt is fun. Fun to post them on Twitter too, and watch people overreact. To that end, the social media I use most is Twitter, @CoreyLewis86. I also contribute pieces for Forbes Wheels and Forbes Home.

More by Corey Lewis

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 24 comments
  • Dukeisduke Dukeisduke on May 19, 2020

    I've long been a fan of the Mangusta. Chasing Classic Cars (Season 15, Episode 9) recently featured the restoration of a '69 Mangusta for Dave Robinson, the drummer for The Cars. Robinson had bought the car 20 years earlier, snapping it up from a buyer that had planned to heavily modify the car for some kind of racing. He had never driven the car (had only heard it run once, when he bought it), and had kept it in storage. The bodyshell was in remarkably good shape, with very little rust, and very little prior bodywork done on it.

  • Eng_alvarado90 Eng_alvarado90 on May 19, 2020

    Yesterday my in-laws gave me an old book titled "Automobile Quarterly's World of Cars" , dated 1971. A red De Tomaso Mangusta is one of the 200 cars featured on that book (which also featured Studebakers, Packard, RR, Cord, Chevy, Chrysler among others). A 0-60 of 5.9 seconds with the 289 and 155 mph top speed sounds great for the time, but the American version with the 302 only did 7 seconds flat and 120 mph top speed. A 5 spd ZF transmission was the best you could get back then. It sounds like a real sports car to me

  • MaintenanceCosts Nobody here seems to acknowledge that there are multiple use cases for cars.Some people spend all their time driving all over the country and need every mile and minute of time savings. ICE cars are better for them right now.Some people only drive locally and fly when they travel. For them, there's probably a range number that works, and they don't really need more. For the uses for which we use our EV, that would be around 150 miles. The other thing about a low range requirement is it can make 120V charging viable. If you don't drive more than an average of about 40 miles/day, you can probably get enough electrons through a wall outlet. We spent over two years charging our Bolt only through 120V, while our house was getting rebuilt, and never had an issue.Those are extremes. There are all sorts of use cases in between, which probably represent the majority of drivers. For some users, what's needed is more range. But I think for most users, what's needed is better charging. Retrofit apartment garages like Tim's with 240V outlets at every spot. Install more L3 chargers in supermarket parking lots and alongside gas stations. Make chargers that work like Tesla Superchargers as ubiquitous as gas stations, and EV charging will not be an issue for most users.
  • MaintenanceCosts I don't have an opinion on whether any one plant unionizing is the right answer, but the employees sure need to have the right to organize. Unions or the credible threat of unionization are the only thing, history has proven, that can keep employers honest. Without it, we've seen over and over, the employers have complete power over the workers and feel free to exploit the workers however they see fit. (And don't tell me "oh, the workers can just leave" - in an oligopolistic industry, working conditions quickly converge, and there's not another employer right around the corner.)
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh [h3]Wake me up when it is a 1989 635Csi with a M88/3[/h3]
  • BrandX "I can charge using the 240V outlets, sure, but it’s slow."No it's not. That's what all home chargers use - 240V.
  • Jalop1991 does the odometer represent itself in an analog fashion? Will the numbers roll slowly and stop wherever, or do they just blink to the next number like any old boring modern car?
Next