Pandemic Discounts: One Buick Tops Them All

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Not sure about you, but these past few weeks has seen yours truly think more about remdesivir and potatoes (at alternating times) than the Buick brand. I’d put the ratio somewhere close to 99:1, though you could add an extra digit to that first number and probably still be bang-on.

Yes, it’s a brand that’s not top of mind, earning itself more headlines for ditching cars than for adding crossovers. And yet, when our lockdowns end the the virus is vanquished and the open road cries out its alluring siren song, cushy, long-legged cruising machines might be the first thing to cross your mind. It seems Buick has just the thing for you, but you’ll have to act fast — and search long and hard.

According to JATO Dynamics, the best open cash offer for any vehicle sold in the U.S. on Tuesday happened to be a vehicle that ceased production 13 months ago. We’re talking about the full-sized Buick LaCrosse — a stretch-your-legs comfort cruisers that looked great in its final iteration, but fell victim to a buying public that had no use for such things.

As of April 28th, the best open cash offer for cars can be found on the 2019 @Buick LaCrosse Preferred FWD (23.85% discount), which can be found throughout the entire United States. pic.twitter.com/8gUwfx61rw

— JATODynamics_NA (@JATODynamics_NA) April 29, 2020

Buick’s consumer website no longer even lists the 2019 LaCrosse, which could also be had in a very short-lived Avenir variant. It’s gone, just like the Eurotripping Cascada drop-top and, soon, the Regal line. This year marks the last go-round for that historic nameplate. Come 2021, Buick will be an all-crossover brand.

It’ll still boast more models than Chrysler, at least.

Being a weirdo who loves large domestic sedans, my time behind the wheel of an ’18 LaCrosse was a week well spent, with the big boat proving surprisingly thrifty on a road trip. The car’s lane-holding system also ranked above average in its ability to keep the thing between the lines, the front seat was cavernous, and the handling? Positively nautical. That’s a big strike for many, I guess.

GM’s Detroit-Hamtramck assembly plant punted the LaCrosse back in March 2019 as it shed product ahead of expected closure. That mothballing didn’t come to pass, but GM’s cull of its Detroit-built big passenger cars is now complete. The Chevrolet Impala bit the dust in late February, not long after the Cadillac CT6 full-sizer similarly departed both the plant and the market. The Chevy Volt proved an early victim of Mary Barra’s cost-cutting axe.

Now, D-Ham awaits its new life as an electric vehicle hub.

As for those juicy LaCrosse offers, one wonders how many exist on lots around the country. Cars.com shows only nine 2019 LaCrosses. Indeed, Buick sold just 138 of them in the U.S. in the first three months of the year, with 463 sold in the final quarter of 2019.

[Image: General Motors]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 19 comments
  • Jeff S Jeff S on Apr 30, 2020

    There are so few new Lacrosses and Regals left. There is 1 2019 Buick Lacrosse Avenir within 150 miles of where I live and no Regals. Good cars but new ones are very scarce. Glad I bought my neighbor's 2012 Lacrosse. Not really any current production Buick models I am interested in and few GMs. It will be a long time before I buy another vehicle and I possibly will not buy another new one.

  • Buickman Buickman on Apr 30, 2020

    my 2017 Lacrosse is easily the nicest vehicle I have driven. 80,000 miles of delight.

  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh A prelude is a bad idea. There is already Acura with all the weird sport trims. This will not make back it's R&D money.
  • Analoggrotto I don't see a red car here, how blazing stupid are you people?
  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
Next