QOTD: The Most Superb of All?

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

Yesterday was, in addition to being an excellent palindrome, a pretty big day for sports. With untold million being thrown around by companies vying for attentive eyeballs, our own Chris Tonn offered a roundup of the various and sundry Super Bowl cars ads, leaving us with one questions: what was your fave?

Hyundai seemed to score a touchdown with a good many on the internet with their Smaht Pahk ad, highlighting the Sonata’s ability to worm its own way in and out of a parking spot. It even spurred a MA cop shop to get in on the action.

Quick remindah, that even if your cahh is equipped with smaht pahk, an offisah will give you a ticket if you pahk.

❌ Within 10’ of a Fiah Hydrant

❌ Blocking a Fiah Lane

❌Handicap Pahking w/o placahd

❌ Pahking within 20’ of an Intahsection

❌ Intahfering w/ Snow Removal https://t.co/Wgr4If6CXc

— Braintree Police Department (@BraintreePolice) January 31, 2020

Your author enjoyed the Jeep ad, which latched on to the fact Super Bowl fell on Groundhog Day, dragging Bill Murray out of mothballs to go for (several) spins in the new Gladiator.

How about it? Which of this year’s Super Bowl ads — heck, let’s throw it open to past years, too — was your pick of the litter? Actually, if we’re permitted to go back in time, I’m absolutely selecting the Chrysler 200 ad from a few years ago. That was a great commercial, even if the car itself was somewhat wanting.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 20 comments
  • Gearhead77 Gearhead77 on Feb 04, 2020

    In a sea of meh commercials, Hyundai's "cah pahk" was pretty good, at least it was original. The Genesis ad was OK, I couldn't care less. But back in the day, they would have used "stuffy luxury vehicles" and compared them to "the game changer". Like "The LS400 has all the features of the 560SEC and was half the price" " Is "Always Sunny" that much of a thing that people will get the reference to the character? I've watched the show and I like it, but isn't this commercial about 5 years past its peak? (I know, ads trying to be "cool" is nothing new) For the first time in a long time, the game was better than the ads. And I'm not a football fan or sports fan. I can follow the game, but don't ask me who's the better QB or why they should have used Play Z over Play X in that situation. Don't care.

  • Daniel J Daniel J on Feb 04, 2020

    I for one couldn't stand the Hyundai commercial. Thought it was terrible. Didn't think any of it funny at all. I don't think making fun of the accent was special at all. It would be one thing if these actors really did have that thick of an accent. It might be half believable if Donny or Mark Wahlburg did the commercial. I mean, I wouldn't see actors from the south in some southern twang accent doing a Ford F150 commercial appealing at all. I did enjoy the gladiator commercial.

  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
  • Lou_BC "That’s expensive for a midsize pickup" All of the "offroad" midsize trucks fall in that 65k USD range. The ZR2 is probably the cheapest ( without Bison option).
  • Lou_BC There are a few in my town. They come out on sunny days. I'd rather spend $29k on a square body Chevy
  • Lou_BC I had a 2010 Ford F150 and 2010 Toyota Sienna. The F150 went through 3 sets of brakes and Sienna 2 sets. Similar mileage and 10 year span.4 sets tires on F150. Truck needed a set of rear shocks and front axle seals. The solenoid in the T-case was replaced under warranty. I replaced a "blend door motor" on heater. Sienna needed a water pump and heater blower both on warranty. One TSB then recall on spare tire cable. Has a limp mode due to an engine sensor failure. At 11 years old I had to replace clutch pack in rear diff F150. My ZR2 diesel at 55,000 km. Needs new tires. Duratrac's worn and chewed up. Needed front end alignment (1st time ever on any truck I've owned).Rear brakes worn out. Left pads were to metal. Chevy rear brakes don't like offroad. Weird "inside out" dents in a few spots rear fenders. Typically GM can't really build an offroad truck issue. They won't warranty. Has fender-well liners. Tore off one rear shock protector. Was cheaper to order from GM warehouse through parts supplier than through Chevy dealer. Lots of squeaks and rattles. Infotainment has crashed a few times. Seat heater modual was on recall. One of those post sale retrofit.Local dealer is horrific. If my son can't service or repair it, I'll drive 120 km to the next town. 1st and last Chevy. Love the drivetrain and suspension. Fit and finish mediocre. Dealer sucks.
Next