As Mazda's CX-3 Sheds Trims in the U.S., UK Buyers Can Expect a Disappearance

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

The smallest Mazda crossover, which happened to be too small for a friend of this writer, enters the new decade with a greatly reduced presence. Not just in America, but overseas, too.

While the U.S.-market CX-3 subcompact stands to lose all but one trim in a carefully calculated move by Mazda brass, a different plan is afoot on the other side of the Atlantic.

As reported by CarsDirect last month, 2020 CX-3 selection will amount to just the base Sport model, with the better-outfitted Touring and Grand Touring trims relegated to the wastebasket. This was done to put more room between the model and Mazda’s upcoming CX-30 crossover, which splits the size difference between the CX-3 and compact CX-5.

Hardly a strong seller, the new CX-3 reportedly starts at $21,685 after destination. That’s less than $1,300 below the CX-30’s starting price.

In the UK, Autocar reports that the CX-3 will vanish from the Mazda lineup for a period of time. While that market also receives the tweener CX-30, a brand spokesperson claimed the CX-3’s removal is merely temporary. In that market, like other EU countries, automakers are grappling with vastly stringent emissions regulations that go into effect in 2020; Mazda recently announced it will reduce the number of 2.0-liter MX-5 models sold in the UK to meet its fleetwide emissions limits.

It is believed Britain’s CX-3 will reappear only when it receives a new mild-hybrid 1.5-liter engine borrowed from its platform mate, the Mazda 2. With emissions in check, the CX-3 can then return to the lineup without threatening Mazda’s environmental standing. Of course, the model will still face newfound competition from its larger sibling.

In the U.S., the CX-3 sold 5,000 fewer units than the 6 sedan through November, with year-to-date volume down 5.9 percent. Overall, Mazda sales fell 8.2 percent in 2019.

[Image: Chris Tonn/TTAC]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 10 comments
  • Tankinbeans Tankinbeans on Jan 04, 2020

    Is this where being small enough to experiment with your offerings comes into play? I don't particularly dislike this little bigger, but have never driven one and wonder if it's a bit too hefty for the 2.0 litre engine they've given it. I'm no speed demon and find the 2.5NA in the CX-5 to be perfectly adequate for my daily trundling about to work and on errands, but this thing looks a bit heavy. I suppose it's no worse than the original CX-5 with the 2.0 litre.

  • Tstiles Tstiles on Apr 26, 2020

    Owned a 2017 CX-3 Grand Touring for almost 3 years. Yes, it was small, very very small actually, but plenty of fun to drive. Decent power for the relatively small motor; small size of the vehicle (

  • MaintenanceCosts Poorly packaged, oddly proportioned small CUV with an unrefined hybrid powertrain and a luxury-market price? Who wouldn't want it?
  • MaintenanceCosts Who knows whether it rides or handles acceptably or whether it chews up a set of tires in 5000 miles, but we definitely know it has a "mature stance."Sounds like JUST the kind of previous owner you'd want…
  • 28-Cars-Later Nissan will be very fortunate to not be in the Japanese equivalent of Chapter 11 reorganization over the next 36 months, "getting rolling" is a luxury (also, I see what you did there).
  • MaintenanceCosts RAM! RAM! RAM! ...... the child in the crosswalk that you can't see over the hood of this factory-lifted beast.
  • 3-On-The-Tree Yes all the Older Land Cruiser’s and samurai’s have gone up here as well. I’ve taken both vehicle ps on some pretty rough roads exploring old mine shafts etc. I bought mine right before I deployed back in 08 and got it for $4000 and also bought another that is non running for parts, got a complete engine, drive train. The mice love it unfortunately.
Next