Renault Chairman Still Carries a Torch for FCA Merger

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky
renault chairman still carries a torch for fca merger

While the proposed merger between Renault and Fiat Chrysler Automobiles was stymied after the French government refused to sign off on the deal without support from Renault’s Japanese partners, Chairman Jean-Dominique Senard has indicated he’s still keen on the idea.

Nissan’s reluctance to endorse the arrangement last June may have queered the deal, but things are evolving. The Japanese automaker has strived to reduce Renault’s influence in the automotive alliance, especially since the November arrest of Carlos Ghosn. Unfortunately for Nissan, ex-CEO Hiroto Saikawa was also caught up in the financial scandal — forcing him to resign. The Japanese automaker is now seeking a permanent replacement while CFO Yasuhiro Yamauchi runs things in the interim.

While it’s unlikely to make Japanese shareholders supportive of French involvement, it does provide an opportunity for Nissan to find a new chief executive who’s a bit more sympathetic to Renault’s desires.

“[If a FCA merger proposal] were to come back under conditions that are acceptable for all, I would be delighted,” Senard told French officials on Tuesday. The chairman also confirmed that no such deal is being discussed, according to Bloomberg.

While Fiat Chrysler remains pretty quiet on the issue, it’s widely known that it’s seeking to partner with another automaker. The current situation may make Renault less palatable but that doesn’t necessarily have to be true in the future. Hiroshige Seko, the economy and trade minister of Japan, and Bruno Le Maire, France’s finance minister, have already indicated that it’s in the countries’ best interests to restore the alliance — emphasizing fairness. Earlier this month, the pair announced a cooperative agreement for the countries to work together on advanced automotive technologies.

“The two ministers reaffirmed their strong support for the Nissan-Renault alliance and discussed the two companies’ discussions to strengthen the alliance’s competitiveness,” explained the joint statement.

Renault may press Nissan’s next leader to endorse the previously proposed merger with FCA. The hard part will be ensuring that Saikawa’s replacement is inclined to listen. The CEO search has been going on since July, with the final decision expected to take place in October. With Senard already on the six-member nominating committee, there’s an opportunity to get someone that’s sympathetic to Renault’s goals.

This will not be CEO’s primary concern, however. Nissan needs to turn its financial situation around immediately — and this issue will take precedence over ensuring the automaker’s autonomy within the alliance or doing partner members any favors. The Japanese firm also wants to equalize the cross-shareholdings that favor the French side of the alliance while minimizing the involvement of the French government. Nissan currently holds a 15-percent stake in Renault with no voting rights, while Renault has 43 percent of the Japanese company, with votes.

Takaki Nakanishi, president of the Tokyo-based Nakanishi Research Institute, expressed fears that Nissan’s next CEO could face insurmountable obstacles due to being stretched in so many different directions. “I have doubts about whether the nominating committee can carry out its function properly,” he said.

[Image: Renault]

Join the conversation
2 of 4 comments
  • Steve203 Steve203 on Sep 26, 2019

    Another honcho intent on empire building. FCA would bring precious little to Nissan/Renault.

  • Ect Ect on Sep 26, 2019

    I seem to recall that the French government was seeking guarantees that operations in France would be fully maintained, and other assurances that there would be no negative impact on France, which FCA and Renault regarded as excessive. I do not recall that the French government had any concern for Nissan's views on anything. I could be mistaken, of course. Speaking of mistaken, "(he) has strived" is simply not part of the English language. One can say "he strove" or "he has striven".

  • Nrd515 Usually for me it's been Arby's for pretty much forever, except when the one near my house dosed me with food poisoning twice in about a year. Both times were horrible, but the second time was just so terrible it's up near the top of my medical horror stories, and I have a few of those. Obviously, I never went to that one again. I'm still pissed at Arby's for dropping Potato Cakes, and Culver's is truly better anyway. It will be Arby's fish for my "cheat day", when I eat what I want. No tartar sauce and no lettuce on mine, please. And if I get a fish and a French Dip & Swiss? Keep the Swiss, and the dip, too salty. Just the meat and the bread for me, thanks. The odds are about 25% that they will screw one or both of them up and I will have to drive through again to get replacement sandwiches. Culver's seems to get my order right many times in a row, but if I hurry and don't check my order, that's when it's screwed up and garbage to me. My best friend lives on Starbucks coffee. I don't understand coffee's appeal at all. Both my sister and I hate anything it's in. It's like green peppers, they ruin everything they touch. About the only things I hate more than coffee are most condiments, ranked from most hated to..who cares..[list=1][*]Tartar sauce. Just thinking about it makes me smell it in my head. A nod to Ranch here too. Disgusting. [/*][*]Mayo. JEEEEZUS! WTF?[/*][*]Ketchup. Sweet puke tasting sludge. On my fries? Salt. [/*][*]Mustard. Yikes. Brown, yellow, whatever, it's just awful.[/*][*]Pickles. Just ruin it from the pickle juice. No. [/*][*]Horsey, Secret, whatever sauce. Gross. [/*][*]American Cheese. American Sleeze. Any cheese, I don't want it.[/*][*]Shredded lettuce. I don't hate it, but it's warm and what's the point?[/*][*]Raw onion. Totally OK, but not something I really want. Grilled onions is a whole nother thing, I WANT those on a burger.[/*][*]Any of that "juice" that Subway and other sandwich places want to put on. NO, HELL NO! Actually, move this up to #5. [/*][/list=1]
  • SPPPP It seems like a really nice car that's just still trying to find its customer.
  • MRF 95 T-Bird I owned an 87 Thunderbird aka the second generation aero bird. It was a fine driving comfortable and very reliable car. Quite underrated compared to the GM G-body mid sized coupes since unlike them they had rack and pinion steering and struts on all four wheels plus fuel injection which GM was a bit late to the game on their mid and full sized cars. When I sold it I considered a Mark VII LSC which like many had its trouble prone air suspension deleted and replaced with coils and struts. Instead I went for a MN-12 Thunderbird.
  • SCE to AUX Somebody got the bill of material mixed up and never caught it.Maybe the stud was for a different version (like the 4xe) which might use a different fuel tank.
  • Inside Looking Out Scandinavian design costs only $600? I mean the furniture.