Renault Chairman Opens Up About FCA Merger Failure

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

It was downright amazing how fast the proposed merger between Fiat Chrysler Automobiles and the Renault-Nissan-Mitsubishi Alliance collapsed. Considering the auto group’s messy state, there may have been no alternative. While Nissan’s unwillingness to support the merger is often cited as a chief reason in FCA’s backing out, it seems the Italian-American company was similarly spooked by internal strife within the alliance.

Renault Chairman Jean-Dominique Senard addressed the matter on Wednesday during the automaker’s annual meeting in Paris. He told shareholders that the French government’s inability to act was what ultimately led to Fiat Chrysler backing out of the deal, while openly lamenting the missed opportunity.

“This project remains, in my head, absolutely remarkable and exceptional,” Senard said. “Frankly, I am saddened.”

According to Bloomberg, Renault’s chairman placed much of the blame on the French government. France wanted Nissan on board and asked Renault to postpone voting on the merger, but FCA turned tail and ran. Senard mentioned it was Finance Minister Bruno Le Maire who first suggested that Renault approach FCA earlier in the year, adding that he was, ironically, one of the people that insisted the deal wait on Nissan — which does not enjoy voting rights due to its minority stake in Renault.

“It was the first time there was a chance to create a European champion at a time when people keep complaining that it doesn’t exist,” he said. “This was a perfect example for France, for Renault and Europe to prove that we can do something together.”

From Bloomberg:

French Finance Minister Bruno Le Maire told franceinfo radio he was not responsible for derailing the merger deal’s collapse. “It remains in interesting opportunity. But I have always been very clear: that it should be in the context of a strategy to reinforce the [Renault-Nissan] alliance,” he said.

Le Maire said he would meet Senard but added he would tell him that strengthening the Renault-Nissan alliance was the priority. “As long as the French state is the main shareholder, its responsibility to the company, its employees, its factories and research centers is to fulfill its role with other shareholders in defining a strategy.”

The deal collapsed after Nissan said it would abstain at a Renault board meeting to vote on the merger proposal, prompting Le Maire to request the Renault board to postpone the vote for five days. “We simply asked for five extra days. Five additional days seems entirely reasonable to me,” Le Maire said. “Fiat withdrew its offer, as it was entitled to do. But believe me, the state will never react under pressure.”

During Wednesday’s meeting, Senard was also pressured about Renault’s decision to block corporate governance changes at Nissan. He denied that the decision was in response to the failed merger and claimed the proposed modifications wouldn’t provide Renault CEO Thierry Bollore the same representation on Nissan’s committees as Nissan-nominated directors have on committees of the French company’s board. “We’re not asking for more than this. It’s not a reason to start a war,” Senard said.

He also acknowledged that the fallout stemming from Carlos Ghosn’s arrest has been a major hurdle for both companies. Senard, who has been charged with repairing the fractured alliance in Ghosn’s stead, said the matter “left the alliance more damaged than what was initially apparent.”

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 16 comments
  • Michael S6 Michael S6 on Jun 15, 2019

    Renault needs Nissan much more than FCA so it makes no sense for it to try to form another alliance. The only possible rational for this fiasco is that Renault attempted to force Nissan to complete the merger. Otherwise why wouldn't it consult with Nissan about the FCA merger beforehand. Now Renault is conveniently blaming the French goverement for it's "failure to merge" after Nissan said no go .

  • Jeff S Jeff S on Jun 16, 2019

    This merger would have been bad for both FCA and Renault. Both dodged a bullet.

  • Redapple2 I think I ve been in 100 plants. ~ 20 in Mexico. ~10 Europe. Balance usa. About 1/2 nonunion. I supervised UAW skilled trades guys at GM Powertrain for 6 years. I know the answer.PS- you do know GM products - sales weighted - average about 40% USA-Canada Content.
  • Jrhurren Unions and ownership need to work towards the common good together. Shawn Fain is a clown who would love to drive the companies out of business (or offshored) just to claim victory.
  • Redapple2 Tadge will be replaced with a girl. Even thought -today- only 13% of engineer -newly granted BS are female. So, a Tadge level job takes ~~ 25 yrs of experience, I d look at % in 2000. I d bet it was lower. Not higher. 10%. (You cannot believe what % of top jobs at gm are women. @ 10%. Jeez.)
  • Redapple2 .....styling has moved into [s]exotic car territory[/s] tortured over done origami land.  There; I fixed it. C 7 is best looking.
  • TheEndlessEnigma Of course they should unionize. US based automotive production component production and auto assembly plants with unionized memberships produce the highest quality products in the automotive sector. Just look at the high quality products produced by GM, Ford and Chrysler!
Next