As Taycan Awaits EPA Figures, Porsche's U.S. Boss Offers a Hint

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

The one thing we don’t know about Porsche’s sexy and prohibitively expensive Taycan EV happens to be one of the most important aspects of any electric car: its range. While many of you (read: almost certainly all of you) have no use for the Taycan and couldn’t afford one without a Brinks holdup, the newly revealed model is nonetheless making waves.

Mostly among argumentative nerds, mind you, but bear with us.

Call it pettiness, call it schadenfreude, call it whatever you like, but it’s quite enjoyable watching an established and storied automaker attempt to beat Tesla at its own game. The Fremont, California-based automaker had it coming after years of pencil-snapping pronouncements by its larger-than-life CEO. And maybe there’s some satisfaction to be had on the part of Tesla for creating a segment other rivals want to carve a slice out of.

But about that range…

Hot on the heels of the big reveal, Bloomberg caught up with Porsche Cars North America CEO Klaus Zellmer for a very hard-hitting interview in New York City. While a concurrent unveiling in Germany floated the possibility of a 280-mile range on Europe’s WLTP cycle, which would translate into a slightly lower EPA figure, the nattily-dressed Zellmer suggested American Taycan buyers could expect a less Bolt-like driving radius.

The executive said his team drove a Taycan from the model’s Niagara Falls, Ontario launch site to NYC, stopping to charge up after 240 miles of driving. At that point, some 45 miles of range remained on the vehicle’s display, Zellmer said.

Judging by a couple of short clips of the Taycan en route, it seems the blue Turbo S model stopped for juice in Binghamton, NY after travelling the I-90 and I-81 corridors. Except for the last handful of miles, that’s a flat stretch of roadway with annoyingly low speed limits. There wouldn’t be many opportunities to recoup a bit of charge from braking and coasting. If a Taycan Turbo S driver can expect that kind of mileage on the highway, Porsche might not need to worry all that much about the Model S’s significantly advanced range (370 miles in Long Range spec, 345 miles in Performance) — though the Model S’s lower price, plus the range difference, means Advantage Tesla in the event anyone cross-shops these two models.

As the most powerful Taycans of the range, the Turbo and Turbo S command the loftiest prices while eating up the most power from their high-output (670 and 750 hp, respectively) dual-motor powertrains. A lesser Taycan with a single motor and longer range would push the Taycan and Model S much closer together in terms of price and driving distance, but such a model remains hazy for now. Naturally, Porsche wants to enter the segment with a splash (and earn the most revenue while doing it), hence starting off with its top-trim models.

[Image: Porsche]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 41 comments
  • IBx1 IBx1 on Sep 09, 2019

    Christ, line 2 of the article and you're calling us all poor. That's a great look, insulting your audience. Have fun with whatever you drive, journalist.

    • Art Vandelay Art Vandelay on Sep 09, 2019

      Yep. I could swing one and I know other posters here could as well. Not that I would because it seems to be a lot to pay for less capability than the Competition.

  • Art Vandelay Art Vandelay on Sep 09, 2019

    You know, I am not the biggest Musk fan by any stretch and sometimes I feel Tesla would be better off without him at the helm, However, It is nice to see the rest of the world playing catch up to a US Automotive company for a change. Hate on about how the company is run and all that, but frankly if you want an EV by most objective standards there isn't a better one to buy than a Tesla. Furthermore, as I have recently shopped them if you live in the Southeast Tesla is the only one that won't look at you like you have a second you know what growing out of your forehead when you ask about an EV. I was fairly harsh on Tesla up until recently even after enjoying test drives. But between seeing manufacturer after manufacturer bring out "Tesla Killers" only to miss the mark and seeing several friends now enjoy very positive ownership experiences as well as seeing that even our old Leaf was perfectly livable 95 percent of the time I have been converted. Anyway, it reminds me of every GM that came out in the late 90's to early 2000's. "This is the car that is finally as good as the Japanese" only to hear it again at the models replacement. Good on Tesla. Perhaps Toyota will rebadge them soon.

    • SCE to AUX SCE to AUX on Sep 09, 2019

      Well said. I've balked twice at buying a Model 3, but I've been thrilled with my Ioniq EV. My pause on the Model 3 (Fall of 2018) was due to: 1. Obvious quality issues, even on the showroom car. 2. Corporate instability. 3. Price. 4. Badge snobbery. (e.g.: some friends had eyebrows raised at them for buying a used M-B SUV, so they traded it for a more-expensive Toyota minivan and nobody said a word. I'm reluctant to have to explain the "T" to people.) 5. Center display. 6. Egress. I had trouble getting out, doe to something odd with the steering wheel and brake pedal. I could figure it out eventually.

  • MaintenanceCosts Poorly packaged, oddly proportioned small CUV with an unrefined hybrid powertrain and a luxury-market price? Who wouldn't want it?
  • MaintenanceCosts Who knows whether it rides or handles acceptably or whether it chews up a set of tires in 5000 miles, but we definitely know it has a "mature stance."Sounds like JUST the kind of previous owner you'd want…
  • 28-Cars-Later Nissan will be very fortunate to not be in the Japanese equivalent of Chapter 11 reorganization over the next 36 months, "getting rolling" is a luxury (also, I see what you did there).
  • MaintenanceCosts RAM! RAM! RAM! ...... the child in the crosswalk that you can't see over the hood of this factory-lifted beast.
  • 3-On-The-Tree Yes all the Older Land Cruiser’s and samurai’s have gone up here as well. I’ve taken both vehicle ps on some pretty rough roads exploring old mine shafts etc. I bought mine right before I deployed back in 08 and got it for $4000 and also bought another that is non running for parts, got a complete engine, drive train. The mice love it unfortunately.
Next