How Many Chevrolet Corvette C8 Stingrays is General Motors Going to Sell? A Lot, At First

Timothy Cain
by Timothy Cain

In accordance with all that is true in the U.S. sports car market, General Motors is about to sell 2020 Chevrolet Corvette C8 Stingrays by the truckload before settling in to a few years of significantly less volume.

Even casual industry observers understand that trend. Between the hype, the early adoption fervor, and the performance leaps generally represented by a new species of sportus caricus, shoppers tend to turn en masse to the newest, flashiest, boldest two-door. That pattern is amplified by vehicles with legendary status.

Fortunately, the legends aren’t as inherently prone to suffering from dramatic, post-hype declines in demand (See: FR-S, Scion.) History tells us General Motors’ 66-year-old sports car will surge some 40 percent in 2020 and then continue rising in 2021 before dipping somewhat in 2022.

The Corvette average buyer age is a whole ‘nuther story.

One thing is certain: when it comes to publicizing expectations, GM doesn’t want to play ball. “We’re not discussing sales or production projections for the 2020 Corvette Stingray at this time,” Chevrolet spokesperson Kevin Kelly told TTAC last week. Kelly’s at this time phrase gave us cause for hope, so we asked again two minutes later, to no avail.

Looking back at the three most recent launches of new Corvettes therefore becomes a primary means of discovering what might happen with the C8.

During the first year of the C5, for example, sales rose 28 percent compared to the final year for the C4 before rising a further 29 percent in 1999.

The C6’s launch didn’t incite quite as much passion. To be fair, the C6 didn’t possess the same level of all-newness that the C5 (or the C8, for that matter) made so obvious. The ’04 launch spiked volume, but in its first full year of 2005, sales actually declined before rising modestly in 2006. (In fact, that ’06 total of 36,518 U.S. Corvette sales is the highest since the C4’s early 80s heyday.)

Venture only as far back as the C7’s launch and the demand deluge that came with the arrival of a new ‘Vette was easy to spot. U.S. sales in 2014 doubled 2013’s output before dipping in 2015.

With history in mind, can Chevrolet instantly return the Corvette to that annual 35,000/units that seems so otherworldly for a high-dollar sports car? Here are three key factors working against the C8.

  • The C7’s decline has been more precipitous than the decline of its predecessors. Sales dropped in 2015, 2016, 2017, and 2018; falling 46 percent during that period. (2019 sales are down again.)
  • Though arguably more of a performance bargain than ever before, the C8’s sub-$60K sticker is still higher than ever before.
  • The typical Corvette buyer is aging out of the sports car market. The car’s average buyer is 61 years old; 60 percent of buyers are over 55. You can’t blame the expense of the car for that fact — the average Porsche 911 buyer is nearly a decade younger.

Yet it’s worth our while to strip away history and numbers. After all, GM threw decades of history into the dustbin just by creating the C8: a mid-engined car with a predictably-Xeroxed mid-engined silhouette and no manual transmission. The Corvette C8’s potential in a shrinking sports car market may well have no relation to the launch of any Corvette replacement in history. Here are three key factors working in the C8’s favor.

  • The C8 is likely to shift the performance paradigm in an altogether different manner. Think of the Nissan GT-R in 2008.
  • While clearly not shaped like a Corvette in the traditional sense, the new Corvette’s name recognition and vast dealer network work wonders when compared with, say, oh I don’t know, the rather more costly Alfa Romeo 4C Spider.
  • GM is ready to build Corvettes. The Bowling Green, Kentucky, workforce has grown by 400 to 1,300 people. GM has also invested $900 million in Bowling Green since 2011. This isn’t one of those situations where an automaker is caught off guard by early demand for a previously unknown sports car.

There’s also the possibility that the gradual decline in interest for the existing Corvette has less to do with the shrinking sports car market and more to do with the ascendant buzz around the potential of a forthcoming mid-engined Corvette. In other words, the C7’s low U.S. sales totals could bode well for the C8. Don’t forget, too, that the new car’s potential for global demand (including right-hand drive) could limit U.S. capacity.

As a result, it’s entirely possible that GM will sell 30,000 Corvettes in the U.S. in 2020; not quite double the monthly output the C7 is currently producing. Given the conditions of the market and the age of the typical Corvette buyer, however, the Corvette’s rate of decline over the next half-decade is likely to be even sharper with the C8 than it was with the C7.

Timothy Cain is a contributing analyst at The Truth About Cars and Driving.ca and the founder and former editor of GoodCarBadCar.net. Follow on Twitter @timcaincars and Instagram.

[Images: General Motors]

Timothy Cain
Timothy Cain

More by Timothy Cain

Comments
Join the conversation
9 of 61 comments
  • Cprescott Cprescott on Jul 29, 2019

    Once those fools who bought the $60k entry Corvette find out that their orders are pushed behind the most expensively optioned ones, Chevrolet will have a problem. And even if the cheapo models get built, GM dealers will slather on a Market Adjustment of at least $10k. This is how this company does business. You might find pockets of dealers who won't jack the price on this car to high heaven, but most will. And I'm assuming that the most expensive WON'T get market value adjustments. They likely will. In 18 months, dealers will beg, borrow, and steal people to buy this hideous thing.

    • See 6 previous
    • Hummer Hummer on Jul 29, 2019

      @Hummer It’s such an obvious easy answer to the daily drive to work, it’s light and nimble, great on fuel, cheap to insure, huge aftermarket, parts are cheaper than most parts on a Honda, just put some long lasting all seasons (possibly a symmetrical tire/wheel setup).

  • SuperCarEnthusiast SuperCarEnthusiast on Aug 08, 2019

    The day after it was release my three in town dealers said it was sold out for model year 2029 and 2021!

  • Philip I love seeing these stories regarding concepts that I have vague memories of from collector magazines, books, etc (usually by the esteemed Richard Langworth who I credit for most of my car history knowledge!!!). On a tangent here, I remember reading Lee Iacocca's autobiography in the late 1980s, and being impressed, though on a second reading, my older and self realized why Henry Ford II must have found him irritating. He took credit for and boasted about everything successful being his alone, and sidestepped anything that was unsuccessful. Although a very interesting about some of the history of the US car industry from the 1950s through the 1980s, one needs to remind oneself of the subjective recounting in this book. Iacocca mentioned Henry II's motto "Never complain; never explain" which is basically the M.O. of the Royal Family, so few heard his side of the story. I first began to question Iacocca's rationale when he calls himself "The Father of the Mustang". He even said how so many people have taken credit for the Mustang that he would hate to be seen in public with the mother. To me, much of the Mustang's success needs to be credited to the DESIGNER Joe Oros. If the car did not have that iconic appearance, it wouldn't have become an icon. Of course accounting (making it affordable), marketing (identifying and understanding the car's market) and engineering (building a car from a Falcon base to meet the cost and marketing goals) were also instrumental, as well as Iacocca's leadership....but truth be told, I don't give him much credit at all. If he did it all, it would have looked as dowdy as a 1980s K-car. He simply did not grasp car style and design like a Bill Mitchell or John Delorean at GM. Hell, in the same book he claims credit for the Brougham era four-door Thunderbird with landau bars (ugh) and putting a "Rolls-Royce grille" on the Continental Mark III. Interesting ideas, but made the cars look chintzy, old-fashioned and pretentious. Dean Martin found them cool as "Matt Helm" in the late 1960s, but he was already well into middle age by then. It's hard not to laugh at these cartoon vehicles.
  • Dwford The real crime is not bringing this EV to the US (along with the Jeep Avenger EV)
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Another Hyunkia'sis? 🙈
  • SCE to AUX "Hyundai told us that perhaps he or she is a performance enthusiast who is EV hesitant."I'm not so sure. If you're 'EV hesitant', you're not going to jump into a $66k performance car for your first EV experience, especially with its compromised range. Unless this car is purchased as a weekend toy, which perhaps Hyundai is describing.Quite the opposite, I think this car is for a 2nd-time EV buyer (like me*) who understands what they're getting into. Even the Model 3 Performance is a less overt track star.*But since I have no interest in owning a performance car, this one wouldn't be for me. A heavily-discounted standard Ioniq 5 (or 6) would be fine.Tim - When you say the car is longer and wider, is that achieved with cladding changes, or metal (like the Raptor)?
  • JMII I doubt Hyundai would spend the development costs without having some idea of a target buyer.As an occasional track rat myself I can't imagine such a buyer exists. Nearly $70k nets you a really good track toy especially on the used market. This seems like a bunch of gimmicks applied to a decent hot hatch EV that isn't going to impression anyone given its badge. Normally I'd cheer such a thing but it seems silly. Its almost like they made this just for fun. That is awesome and I appreciate it but given the small niche I gotta think the development time, money and effort should have been focused elsewhere. Something more mainstream? Or is this Hyundai's attempt at some kind of halo sports car?Also seems Hyundai never reviles sales targets so its hard to judge successful products in their line up. I wonder how brutal depreciation will be on these things. In two years at $40k this would a total hoot.So no active dampers on this model?
Next