Ram 1500 Airbag/Seat Belt Glitch Comes Hot on the Heels of the Old Ram's Driveshaft Drop Recall

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

It’s a bad week for owners of current- and older-gen Ram pickups, assuming they’re safety conscious and have busy summer schedules. Fiat Chrysler Automobiles launched two recalls this week targeting its full-size trucks; the latest being a voluntary callback of nearly 343,000 2019 and 2020 Ram 1500s over a software glitch that could disable airbags and seat belt pretensioners.

Then there’s the voluntary recall of old-gen Ram 1500s from the 2018 and 2019 model years (Ram “Classic” for 2019) that could drop their driveshaft while driving.

First, the airbags. According to documents sent to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Fiat Chrysler claims, “The flash memory of the Occupant Restraint Controller


(ORC) may become corrupted, disabling the vehicle’s air bags and seat belt pretensioners.”

ORCs with updated software came online within the last couple of months, so not that many 2020 Rams contain the potential glitch. The recalls covers 295,981 Ram 1500s sold in the United States.

“Once the vehicle is keyed-off, the ORC begins normal routines under its own power reserve. If the ORC powers down and interrupts a memory erase process, data corruption could occur,” FCA stated. “Memory cleanup does not occur every key-off, not all interruptions will cause corruption, reserve time will vary, and other factors make the occurrence highly variable.”

Recall notices should hit mailboxes around July 20th, with owners reimbursed for any expenses incurred by the fix. As of May 20th, there are no known incidents associated with the issue.

As for the old-gen Ram, which FCA keeps around because why not, a less-than-ideal weld is the culprit in the driveshaft recall. On 10,160 2018-2019 Ram 1500s, a weld between the driveshaft tube and tub yoke may fracture, leading the truck to grow a tail that scrapes along the roadway. It goes without saying that drivers may notice a sudden loss of power.

The driveshaft recall came after six warranty claims sparked an investigation, though FCA says it is not aware of any injuries or accidents stemming from the problem. Recall notices should arrive in mid-June.

[Images: Fiat Chrysler Automobiles]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 12 comments
  • Gasser Gasser on Jun 08, 2019

    In May I got a new CUV. I originally wanted a Honda CRV EX-L, but the problems with the 1.5T scared me off. The best part of Hondas used to be, no problems. The second best was the resale. I don’t foresee either advantage for the new CRV turbos.

  • Dukeisduke Dukeisduke on Jun 10, 2019

    I wonder who the driveshaft assembly supplier is? Dana-Spicer?

  • Theflyersfan I know given the body style they'll sell dozens, but for those of us who grew up wanting a nice Prelude Si with 4WS but our student budgets said no way, it'd be interesting to see if Honda can persuade GenX-ers to open their wallets for one. Civic Type-R powertrain in a coupe body style? Mild hybrid if they have to? The holy grail will still be if Honda gives the ultimate middle finger towards all things EV and hybrid, hides a few engineers in the basement away from spy cameras and leaks, comes up with a limited run of 9,000 rpm engines and gives us the last gasp of the S2000 once again. A send off to remind us of when once they screamed before everything sounds like a whirring appliance.
  • Jeff Nice concept car. One can only dream.
  • Funky D The problem is not exclusively the cost of the vehicle. The problem is that there are too few use cases for BEVs that couldn't be done by a plug-in hybrid, with the latter having the ability to do long-range trips without requiring lengthy recharging and being better able to function in really cold climates.In our particular case, a plug-in hybrid would run in all electric mode for the vast majority of the miles we would drive on a regular basis. It would also charge faster and the battery replacement should be less expensive than its BEV counterpart.So the answer for me is a polite, but firm NO.
  • 3SpeedAutomatic 2012 Ford Escape V6 FWD at 147k miles:Just went thru a heavy maintenance cycle: full brake job with rotors and drums, replace top & bottom radiator hoses, radiator flush, transmission flush, replace valve cover gaskets (still leaks oil, but not as bad as before), & fan belt. Also, #4 fuel injector locked up. About $4.5k spread over 19 months. Sole means of transportation, so don't mind spending the money for reliability. Was going to replace prior to the above maintenance cycle, but COVID screwed up the market ( $4k markup over sticker including $400 for nitrogen in the tires), so bit the bullet. Now serious about replacing, but waiting for used and/or new car prices to fall a bit more. Have my eye on a particular SUV. Last I checked, had a $2.5k discount with great interest rate (better than my CU) for financing. Will keep on driving Escape as long as A/C works. 🚗🚗🚗
  • Rna65689660 For such a flat surface, why not get smoke tint, Rtint or Rvynil. Starts at $8. I used to use a company called Lamin-x, but I think they are gone. Has held up great.
Next